180 likes | 190 Views
This article explores the spread of democracy in Latin America, the dangers it faced, and the current phase of democratic change. It examines the role of the United States and discusses prospects for consolidation. The article challenges American myths and offers recommendations for U.S. involvement in the region.
E N D
WHAT NOW? Democracy and U.S.-Latin American Relations
APPROACHING THE QUESTION • The Taming of Democracy • The Pink Tide: Making Democracy “Dangerous” Again • Looking Ahead: Prospects for Consolidation
READINGS • Smith, Democracy, Epilogue • Smith, “Latin America: Exploring Unexpected Opportunities”
QUESTIONS • What explains the spread of democracy in Latin America? • What kind of democracy? What quality? • What’s new about the current phase of democratic change? How does it compare to prior periods? • What role (if any) for the United States?
INITIATION OF DEMOCRACY • Era of oligarchic democracy (1900-1939) • Elite-led experiments in democracy: • Top-down mobilization, esp. of middle classes • Competition among elites • Co-optation of potential opposition • Weak ideological dimension: focus on politics, not economics
DANGERS OF DEMOCRACY The Onset of Mass Politics, 1940-77: • Popular mobilization • Specters of revolution • Grand policy schemes • Strong states Targets of Threat • Socioeconomic elite • Middle classes • Military • United States
THE TAMING OF DEMOCRACY • Making Democracy Safe, 1978-2000: • Transitional pacts • De-mobilization of labor and peasantry • Fear of extremism • Evaporation of political left • Ideological vacuum • Declining strength of state • Thus: spread and duration of electoral democracy
DANGERS REVIVED? • Democracy as Protest/The Pink Tide (1998- ): • Leftist ideological orientation • Concern with poverty, social justice • Rebuilding state strength • Resistance to Washington Consensus • Condemnation of USA/Bush administration: • Aspiration for “Bolivarian dream” • Q:What good is a democracy that isn’t dangerous?
LOOKING AHEAD I Interim Developments: • Presidential half-lives • 43% “democrats,” 30.5% “ambivalent,” 26.5% “nondemocratic” • Economic growth (≠ poverty reduction) • 9/11 and its aftermath The Problem of Consolidation: • Longevity? Of what? • Deepening • From illiberal to liberal democracy? Or not?
LOOKING AHEAD II • The greater the frustration within the population, • The greater the sympathy with anti-establishment movements, • The more extensive the general participation in elections, • The more clearly defined the partisan or ideological alternatives, and • The more effective the role of representative institutions…
The more divisive will be debates over policy content in Latin America, • The greater the likelihood of nationalistic and/or anti-establishment policies, • The greater the resistance to demands from the United States, and • The greater the probability of policy conflicts with Washington. • Thus: the greater the degree of democracy in Latin America, the greater the degree of inter-American tension and disagreement.
CHALLENGING AMERICAN MYTHS • The Cherished Assumption—freely elected leaders will support U.S. policy • The Western Hemisphere idea—the new world is distinct from old, will forge common front in international arena • Democracy rationale for “regime change”—free elections as protective shield • The hegemonic presumption—the United States can dictate political life in Latin America
U.S. VISIONS FOR LATIN AMERICA • Democratic—with tilt to right or center-right • Prosperous—with commitment to free-market policies and ties to United States • Unified—under U.S. leadership • Peaceful—in view of unanimity • Deferential—following U.S. lead in global arena
REALITY CHECK • Democracy = broad ideological spectrum, from “left” to “right” • Prosperity = mixed economies; rejection of Washington Consensus, FTAs, and FTAA • Ideology = diversity rather than unity • Outlooks = anti-U.S. attitudes strong and growing among large share of population • Alliances = rejection of U.S. leadership and rules of the game
ROLES FOR THE UNITED STATES? • Focus on politics—beyond the war on terror, beyond free trade; recognize exceptional nature of current opportunity • Adopt long-term view of national interest • Hands off! Do not intervene in elections or encourage overthrows of elected leaders • As opportunities arise, bolster institutions and “deepening” of democracy in Latin America • Re-examine The Cherished Assumption