1 / 11

PASV Valve Technology Let Clinical Evidence Be Your Guide

PASV Valve Technology Let Clinical Evidence Be Your Guide. A P ressure A ctivated S afety V alve is Located in the Hub of our PASV PICCs or Stem of our PASV Ports. What Is PASV? How Does It Work?. PASV Requires 1.8 PSI to aspirate, Normal SVC Pressure 0.1 PSI.

petra-ingram
Download Presentation

PASV Valve Technology Let Clinical Evidence Be Your Guide

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PASV Valve TechnologyLet Clinical Evidence Be Your Guide

  2. A Pressure Activated Safety Valve is Located in the Hub of our PASV PICCs or Stem of our PASV Ports What Is PASV? How Does It Work? PASV Requires 1.8 PSI to aspirate, Normal SVC Pressure 0.1 PSI PASV Resists Blood Reflux, Reduces Occlusions, TPA & CR-BSIs & Is Heparin Free. PASV Has 10 Years of Success in 8 Clinical Trails.

  3. PASV Clinical Evidence Matrix

  4. PASV PICC vs. Groshong PICC Study Location: National University of Singapore Source: Journal of Vascular & Intervention Radiology, 2010 Prospective Randomized Trial of 392 PICC Placements PASV had 49% Less Phlebitis vs. Groshong PASV had 67% fewer Infections vs. Groshong Number of Phlebitis Number of Infections 67% Fewer Infections 49% Less Phlebitis

  5. PASV PICC vs. Groshong PICC Study Location: St. Joseph’s Hospital (Tampa Florida)Source: FPIC Conference 2006, INS National Conference 2006. • Prospective Surveillance of 3,705 PICC Placements • Converted to PASV with Inclusive Kit & Maximal Sterile Barrier • 71% Infection Reduction in ICU, 50% Infection Reduction in Non-ICU • 93% Reduction in TPA Usage PICC Infections Per Month PICC Placements vs. TPA Usage 2,357 1,348 599 70 PASV Not In Use PASV In Use 2005 2006 ICU Non-ICU PICC Lines Placed TPA Doses

  6. Retrospective Analysis of Over 12,500 PICC Placements PASV had 78% Fewer Occlusions vs. Non-Valved PICCs PASV had 24% Fewer Infections vs. Non-Valved PICCs PASV Lowered Costs on: TPA, CR-BSIs, PICC Exchanges PASV PICC vs. Non-Valved PICCs Study Location: Vanderbilt UniversitySource: Published in JAVA, 2005 % PICCs With Occlusions % PICCs With Infections 24% Fewer Infections 78% Fewer Occlusions

  7. Prospective Randomized Trial of 3 Needless Injection Caps with 9,634 Line Days PASV had 91% Fewer Occlusions vs. CLAVE and 75% Fewer Occlusions vs. CLC2000 PASV Protector vs. CLC2000 & CLAVE Study Location: WakeMed Raleigh, NCSource: Journal For The Association For Vascular Access, 2004 Occlusions Per 1,000 Catheter Days 3.4 1.2 0.3

  8. Prospective Randomized Trial with 539 Port Placements PASV Reduced Blood Withdrawal Failures By 48% PASV Reduced TPA Usage By 35% PASV Reduced RN Time Spent Managing Occlusions By 88% PASV Port vs. Bard Port (Non-Valved) Study Source: Baylor University Medical Center, 2003 RN Minutes On Occlusions % Withdrawal Failures % Of Ports Requiring TPA 48% Fewer Withdrawal Failures 88% Less RN Time On Occlusions 29% Fewer TPA Doses

  9. Retrospective Analysis of 1,212 PICCs PASV Reduced the Rate of Catheter Repair by 89% and Exchange by 68% PASV PICC vs. Groshong PICC Study Location: University of Washington Medical Center Source: Journal of Infusion Nursing , 2002 Number of Exchanges Number of Repairs 68% Fewer Exchanges 89% Fewer Repairs

  10. Prospective Randomized Trial with 100 PICC Placements PASV had 75% Fewer Infections vs. Groshong PASV had 29% Fewer Occlusions vs. Groshong PASV had 88% Fewer Catheter Fractures vs. Groshong PASV PICC vs. Groshong PICC Study Location: Harborview Medical CenterSource: Journal of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, 2001 Number of Infections Number of Occlusions Number of Fractures 88% Fewer Fractures 75% Fewer Infections 29% Fewer Occlusions

  11. Prospective Randomized Trial with 362 PICC Placements PASV had 58% Fewer Infections vs. Non-Valved PICC PASV had 62% Fewer Occlusions vs. Non-Valved PICC PASV PICC vs. Non-Valved PICC Study Location: Harborview Medical CenterSource: American Journal of Roentgenology , 1999 Number of Infections Number of Occlusions 58% Fewer Infections 62% Fewer Occlusions

More Related