1 / 2

Effective Porosity - Petrophysics Courses & Training

PETROPHYSICS Pty Ltd report appendix extract. u201cThe detail of this porosity evaluation and the equality of numerous core to log comparisons suggest a high degree of certainty in the evaluated total porosity (por).

petro000
Download Presentation

Effective Porosity - Petrophysics Courses & Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effective Porosity - Petrophysics Courses & Training "The detail of the porosity evaluation and also the equality of numerous heart to log comparisons indicate a high level of certainty from the appraised total porosity (por). Core firms frequently use of the expression"effective porosity" to imply these exact same oven dried helium interconnected pores that makes a scenario where the exact same dimension has two distinct names. However'interconnected' isn't the mainstream petrophysical definition of'powerful' porosity along with also the confusion about overall vs. effective porosity is because of this longstanding inconsistency between heart businesses use of the expression"successful porosity" to imply interconnected pores blindsided by He participates from the lab mainstream petrophysicists (Shell, Archie, W&S, NMR literature, and this report) to imply (total porosity -- clay bound water) after Hill, Shirley and Klein's historical connection between laboratory measured Qv along with CBW volume. Hence the exact same dimension value is known as"complete" by mainstream petrophysicists and"successful" by several heart businesses. Herein lies the origin of the disorder. How do a bunch of these plausible, scientifically oriented folk get so confused? The term effective porosity can also be used loosely by other people in an instinctive common sense and generally qualitative manner, as shown below. Note additionally that non-NMR standard logs lack the basic information by which to ascertain a storage capability"powerful" porosity from stones comprising non-clay micro-pores like carbonates or walnut silts. Non-NMR log established determinations of"powerful" porosity in clay and so CBW complimentary micro-porous carbonates are mostly meaningless -- what application is supplying the data for storage capability? When studying a clean carbonates petrophysical report and also the word effective porosity is utilized ask yourself how that amount was quantified. This is the principal reason carbonates (reservoirs in which compaction and clays don't restrain storage capacity and permeability) have been regarded as hard to assess with traditional logs, since no log information is available to quantify storage capability -- the benefit of NMR from carbonates. This writer contrasts with mainstream petrophysics and utilizes"complete porosity" to equate to the fundamental volumetric mention of traditional, sexy oven dried heart to constant weight (c.100degC) porosities, like those plugs dried into 115degC. Reviewers should look for the center report for the important words"oven dried to constant weight" to find out whether the core reference dimension is complete porosity -- roughly 80 percent of heart investigation globally is. In circumstances of humidity drying (generally 60C 40RH) the test should nevertheless be calibrated to this center porosity but SCAL have to possess this exact same dimension as its foundation or the test becomes more"disintegrated petrophysics". Conventional heart, special logs and core have to be equivalent. Logs only carry the center dimensions along the nicely track, like freight trains. Under extremely rare cases (pers. The vital purpose for the petrophysicist here is that correct usage of the center reported grain density at the fixed stage fluid density process herein will still enable logs to replicate the center measured

  2. porosity's by virtue of the cores reduced grain density -- we still need a straight measured benchmark. The key issue is if logs are calibrated into a parameter that's directly measured and precise. Among many reasons for embracing total porosity is the association between shale quantity and Ro could be viewed. In effective porosity tests the analyst is refused this advice because the porosity parameter vanishes in shales, denying that the petrophysicist strong, instant advice for shaly sand tests. In case the petrophysicist wishes to understand tool answers -- which react to the total formation not pieces of it during the petrophysical investigations shale porosity should be hidden out of view and Sw should not be truncated at 1.00. If your users favor the makeup of effective porosity show it as soon as you've completed the test and understood what's actually occurring. For more information about petrophysics courses & training feel free to get in touch with us.

More Related