1 / 14

Privity

Privity. As a general rule, only the parties to the contract can acquire rights and incur liabilities under it CASE: Beswick v Beswick [1968] CASE: Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988)

petula
Download Presentation

Privity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Privity • As a general rule, only the parties to the contract can acquire rights and incur liabilities under it CASE: Beswick v Beswick [1968] CASE: Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) • No right of action in contract exists against a person who is not a party to a contract (but a third party who knowingly and intentionally induces a breach of contract may commit a tort) CASE: Lumley v Gye [1843-60]

  2. Methods of Discharge Discharge Performance Agreement Frustration Operation Of law Breach Virtue of term Lapse of time

  3. Types of Performance • Types of Performance

  4. Discharge by Performance Two Types of Performance 1. Actual Performance The parties must carry out as closely as practicable the terms of the contract CASE: Shipton, Anderson & Co v Weil Brothers & Co [1912] CASE: Re Moore & Co Ltd and Landauer [1921]

  5. Discharge by Performance 2. Partial Performance Generally, payment does not automatically follow unless the contract is divisible (a matter of construction) CASE: Cutter v Powell (1795) although there are exceptions: • if there has been free and willing acceptance of partial performance by the party receiving the benefit • there has been substantial performance and the cost of rectification is small CASE: Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] • if one party is prevented from performing

  6. Discharge by Agreement • A contract created by agreement can be undone by agreement: • Mutual Discharge • where both parties abandon their original agreement while the contract is still executory • Release • where one party has performed their obligations and there is a unilateral discharge of the agreement • Waiver • where one party leads the other party to reasonably believe that strict performance will not be insisted upon

  7. Discharge by Agreement • A contract created by agreement can be undone by agreement (cont): • Substitution • where the parties wish to continue with a contractual relationship but on terms differing from those in the original agreement, a new agreement can be substituted • Accord and Satisfaction • where one party has performed their obligations and the defaulting party is relieved of their obligations by doing something different to that which they were bound to do under the original contract

  8. Discharge by Frustration • The doctrine of frustration offers exceptions to the doctrine of absolute liability. • To be operative, frustration can only arise where: • an unforeseen event outside the control of the parties has significantly changed the obligations of the parties; • neither party caused the supervening event; • neither party contemplated the supervening event; and • it would be unjust to hold the parties to their original contract. CASE: National Carriers v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd [1981]

  9. Discharge by Frustration • Cases involving this doctrine fall into 5 categories: • Physical impossibility because of destruction of the subject matter CASE: Taylor v Caldwell (1863) • Physical impossibility under a contract of personal services • Change in the law rendering performance impossible CASE: Horlock v Beal [1916]

  10. Discharge by Frustration • Impossibility due to non-occurrence of an event basic to the contract CASE: Krell v Henry [1903] CASE: Hearne Bay Steam Boat Co v Hutton [1903] • Where the particular state of affairs ceases to exist CASE: Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982)

  11. Discharge by Frustration • The effect of frustration is to discharge the contract but only as to the future CASE: Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjina v Fairburn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1943] • Victoria has modified the common law position: • Frustrated Contracts Act 1959 allows expenses incurred before frustration to be recovered

  12. Discharge by Frustration • The Effect of Frustration

  13. Discharge by Operation of Law This can happen via: • bankruptcy; • material alteration; • merger; • death if the contract is for personal services; and • discharge by lapse of time CASE: Ballas v Theophilos (No 2) (1957)

  14. Discharge by Breach • Where one party fails to perform their obligations as agreed, they are liable for breach of contract. • Breach may be: • Actual breach where a party fails to perform at the time required by the contract; or • Anticipatory breachwhere a party threatens not to perform prior to the time required by the contract CASE: Foran v Wright (1989) • The effect of breach depends on the importance of the term that is broken. • The remedies available to the injured party will depend on the nature of the breach.

More Related