1 / 25

When is Price Discrimination Profitable?

When is Price Discrimination Profitable?. Eric T. Anderson Kellogg School of Management James Dana Kellogg School of Management. Motivation. Price Discrimination by a Monopolist Offer multiple products of differing qualities Distort quality sold to low value consumers

philana
Download Presentation

When is Price Discrimination Profitable?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. When is Price Discrimination Profitable? Eric T. AndersonKellogg School of Management James DanaKellogg School of Management

  2. Motivation • Price Discrimination by a Monopolist • Offer multiple products of differing qualities • Distort quality sold to low value consumers (Mussa and Rosen, 1978) • But, price discrimination is not always optimal, and certainly not always used • Stokey (1979) • Salant (1989)

  3. Research Agenda • Develop prescriptive tools to evaluate when price discrimination is profitable. • Applications • Advance Purchase Discounts • Screening using reduced flexibility • Intertemporal Price Discrimination • Screening using consumption delays • “Damaged” Goods • Screening using reduced features • Versioning Information Goods • Coupons

  4. Key Assumption: Quality is Constrained • Commonly Made Assumption • Explicit • Salant (1989) • Usually implicit and underemphasized • Coupons (Anderson and Song, 2004) • Intertemporal Price Discrimination (Stokey, 1978) • Damaged Goods (Deneckere and McAfee, 1996) • Versioning (Bhargava and Choudhary)

  5. Case 1: Two Types • Assumptions • Two consumer types, i  {H,L}, with mass ni • Utility: Vi(q) • Cost: c(q) • Unconstrained Quality • Constrained Quality • Upper Bound is q=1

  6. Three Options • Sell just one product to just the high value consumers • Set the price at high type’s willingness to pay • Sell just one product, but price it to sell to both the high and the low value consumers • Set the price at low type’s willingness to pay • Sell one product designed for the high types and second product designed for the low types. • Price the low type’s product at their willingness to pay • Price the high type’s product at their willingness to pay or where they are just indifferent between their product and the low type’s product, whichever is higher. • Lower the quality of the low type’s product to “screen” the high value consumers

  7. Unconstrained Quality c’(q) V’H(q) V’L(q) qL q*L q*H

  8. D c’(q) B V’H(q) A C V’L(q) q*L q*H Constrained Quality BnH > AnL CnL > DnH

  9. Result • Conditions for Price Discrimination • Rewrite these as • A necessary condition is

  10. D c’(q) B V’H(q) A C V’L(q) q*L q*H Constrained Quality

  11. Log Supermodularity A twice differentiable function F(q,q) is everywhere log supermodular if and only if or equivalently

  12. Case 1:Two Types, Two Products

  13. Results Claim 1

  14. Figure

  15. Case 2:Continuum of Types and Qualities

  16. Results Proposition: • IfV(q,q) – c(q)is log submodular then the firm sells a single quality • IfV(q,q) – c(q)is log supermodular then the firm sells multiple qualities

  17. Results • Corollary: IfV(q,q) =h(q)g(q) and c(q) > 0 then the firm sells multiple products if for allq, and the firm sells a single product if

  18. Applications • Intertemporal Price Discrimination • Damaged Goods • Coupons • Versioning Information Goods • Advance Purchase Discounts

  19. Intertemporal Price Discrimination • Stokey (1979), Salant (1989) • U(t,q) = qd t • Product Cost: k(t) = cd t • Transformation • q= d t • This gives us: V(q,q) – c(q) = qq – cq • Results • This is not log supermodular

  20. Intertemporal Price Discrimination • More general utility function – Stokey (1979) • U(t,q) = qg(t) Price discrimination is feasible if g(t)< 0 But is log submodular, if g (t)≤0 and c ≥ 0, so price discrimination never optimal.

  21. Intertemporal Price Discrimination • More general cost function: c(q) • The surplus function is log supermodular if and only if or marginal cost > average cost

  22. Damaged Goods • Model from Deneckere and McAfee (1996) • Continuum of types with unit demands • Two exogenous quality levels: qL and qH • V(qH,q) = q, V(qL,q) = l(q) • V(q,q) - c(q) is log supermodular if • With some additional transformations, we recover the necessary and sufficient condition of Deneckere and McAfee.

  23. Coupons • Model from Anderson and Song (2004) • Consumers uniformly distributed on • No Coupon Used: V(q,N) = a + qb • Coupon Used: V(q,C) = a + qb– H(q) • Product Cost: c Coupon Cost: l • V(q,q) – c(q), q{C,N} is log supermodular if

  24. Versioning Information Goods • Information Goods  No Marginal Cost • Literature • Shapiro and Varian (1998) • Varian (1995, 2001) • Bhargava and Choudhary (2001, 2004) • Versioning profitable only if

  25. When are Advance Purchase Discounts Profitable? James DanaKellogg School of Management

More Related