150 likes | 594 Views
Analysis On Laptop Using QFD —The case of SONY X138JC/P. MEMBERS:Tanglihua Sundan Shaoshasha. 1 INTRODUCTION. 2 CASE STUDY. CONTENTS. 3 CONCLUSION. 4 REFERENCES. 1.INTRODUCTION. How to improve it. VS. 2.CASE STUDY. * Summary sheet of customer investigation. perception. Enquired item.
E N D
Analysis On Laptop Using QFD —The case of SONY X138JC/P MEMBERS:Tanglihua Sundan Shaoshasha
1 INTRODUCTION 2 CASE STUDY CONTENTS 3 CONCLUSION 4 REFERENCES
1.INTRODUCTION How to improve it VS
2.CASE STUDY *Summary sheet of customer investigation perception Enquired item cognitive processing speed machine weight memory amount 5—have a great influence 4—have influence 3—have little influence
2.CASE STUDY *The congruent relationship between the indexes customers care and technique index basic frequency internal memory material size thickness hard disk
2.CASE STUDY * The parameter comparison between SONY and LENOVO
2.CASE STUDY * Key customer needs definded table
2.CASE STUDY FunctionsUsed *Technical Requirements Table *Quality Table Relevancy
2.CASE STUDY * Relationship Matrix
2.CASE STUDY *Correlation Matrix
* Frequency Internal memory Material Size Thickness Hard disk Key customer demand defined Technical requirements Comparative analysis Import-ance Improvement goal Customer demand Weight﹪ Else Improv-ement goal Standard increased rate Commodity characteri-stic point Enterp-rise Speed ⊙ ○ 5 4 3 5 1.67 ◎ 41.7 Weight ⊙ Δ ○ 5 3 5 5 1.00 ◎ 25.0 Capacity ⊙ 5 4 3 5 1.67 ○ 33.3 mportance(%)I 27.29 18.19 16.36 5.45 10.92 21.79 Key quality character setting Comparative analysis Opponent + = + - - + Technique analysis 5 1 3 1 4 2 Quality character design Desired value Setting 3.CONCLUSION House of quality
3.CONCLUSION *Key Quality Character Setting Thick-ness Hard- disk Size Frequency Memory Material ╳ √ ╳ √ √ √ , , , The amount of memory of SONY and LENOVO are equal; correspondingly we can take several steps to target a competitive advantage , , LENOVO performs better, however, the difficulty for improvement is relatively high. Therefore, it is better to develop the attributes later rather than now SONY has a patent for using light material and in contrast, LENOVO does not. As a result, SONY has an advantage. However, there are also some shortcomings, for instance: reliability. Therefore .we should learn from the other competitors in order to improve our products. , When it comes to the size, SONY has some advantages, whereas size is the attribute which is of the lowest technological difficulty. Hence in order to beat the competitors in the market, SONY should strive for continuous innovation in the technology field. The most important one is hard disk, there is much potential for improvement and therefore a lot of attention should be paid to it. The thickness of SONY is among the best in the opening market; however it is difficult for development. Consequently ir would better be delayed the technological improvement
4.REFERENCES • Sullivan LP (1986) Quality function deployment. Qual Prog19:39–50 • 2. Chan L-K, Wu M-L (2002) Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 143:463–497 • 3. Cohen L (1995) Quality function deployment: how to make QFDwork for you. Addison-Wesley, New York