210 likes | 416 Views
SPECIAL PROJECT (INTENSIVE SUPPORT PACKAGE) CARE IN CALDERSTONES . Calderstones Partnership NHS Foundation Trust is a regional provider for adults with a learning disability with complex needs who cannot be supported by other organisations. There are 218 beds around the main site, comprisin
E N D
1. Calderstones Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
2. SPECIAL PROJECT (INTENSIVE SUPPORT PACKAGE) CARE IN CALDERSTONES
3. Calderstones Partnership NHS Foundation Trust is a regional provider for adults with a
learning disability with complex needs who cannot be supported by other
organisations. There are 218 beds around the main site, comprising 36 medium
secure and 182 low secure and open beds in flats and peripheral houses.
Some service users have difficulty forming relationships with peers, sharing staff,
coping with changes in staff and peers, and with lack of structure in activities.
Individuals with autism, autistic spectrum disorder and brain injury fall into this
category. They benefit from a skilled, experienced stable staff team, consistent
approach and a programme of predictable activities.
I will present seven patients managed with intensive support packages (special
projects), detailing brief histories, diagnoses and costs of care.
I will then discuss the implications for community care and the challenge to
normalisation and inclusion.
4. PATIENT A
A 48 year old woman who transferred to
Calderstones in 2006 from a general adult
psychiatric ward on Section 3, detained under
severe mental impairment. She had been
admitted following an attack on a child in the
street, at a time when care staff reported they
could no longer manage her levels of violence.
5. Patient A DIAGNOSES
F71.1 - Moderate mental retardation
Bipolar Affective Disorder unclassified
Probably Autistic Spectrum Disorder
COST OF CURRENT CARE
8.5 staff - £233,883
6. PATIENT B
21 year old woman with moderate mental retardation
and pervasive developmental disorder. Transferred to
Calderstones in February 2006 on Section 3.
7. Patient B DIAGNOSES
F71.1 Moderate mental retardation
F84 Pervasive developmental disorder
COST OF CURRENT CARE
11 staff - £289,424
8. PATIENT C Transferred, aged 18 years, to Calderstones in 2006
on Section 3. Diagnosed with severe mental
retardation and Autistic Spectrum Disorder. Long
history of serious aggression (grabbing, biting,
scratching and hitting), damage to property, pica and
self injury including inserting material into his nose and
biting himself. At the time of admission he was doubly
incontinent. He would defecate and smear faeces
on himself, walls and on staff.
9. Patient C DIAGNOSES
F72.1 Severe mental retardation
F84 Pervasive developmental disorder
Diagnosed with
Chromosome 22 q level deletion
COST OF CURRENT CARE
13 staff - £338,862
10. PATIENT D
40 year old man transferred to Calderstones on
Section 3 from a high secure hospital in April 2006
11. DIAGNOSES
F71.1 Moderate mental retardation
F07.0 Organic personality disorder
COST OF CURRENT CARE
21.50 staff - £588,364
Patient D contd..
12. PATIENT E
Admitted to Calderstones at the age of 15 years - over one hundred services having refused admission. No child service felt that they could meet his needs. He had been placed outside his home district at the age of 13 years into the independent sector provision. Due to his difficult and violent behaviours he was admitted into the NHS. He was nursed on his own on an adult intensive care unit for over 5 months.
13. Patient E
PRIOR TO ADMISSION TO CALDERSTONES
He required a team of 23 staff covering a 24 hour period to provide physical restraint for the entire time he was awake, at a cost in excess of £1.25 million per annum.
DIAGNOSES
F70.1 Mild mental retardation
Tourettes syndrome
ADHD
Autism
COST OF CARE ON DISCHARGE FROM CALDERSTONES
16.50 staff- £449,460
14. PATIENT F 40 year old man with mild mental retardation, organic personality disorder secondary to head injury, recurrent depressive disorder and undifferentiated schizophrenia. Admitted to Calderstones informally in 2001 following a breakdown in a community placement for a special project care package to manage very high levels of physical aggression and damage to property. He threatened to self harm and had become head injured and paraplegic from jumping off a bridge in a suicide attempt aged 26 years. He was detained under Section 3 in January 2002.
15. Patient F DIAGNOSES
F70.1 - Mild mental retardation
F07.0 Organic personality disorder
Recurrent depressive disorder
Undifferentiated schizophrenia
COST OF CURRENT CARE
13 staff - £338,862
16. PATIENT G A 35 year old man moderate mental retardation and
pervasive developmental disorder, transferred to
Calderstones on Section 3 from a temporary placement
in the private sector. The community placement has
not been able to manage his level of physical
aggression and were concerned about his threats to kill
staff and stab them.
17. Patient G
DIAGNOSES
F71. 0 Moderate mental retardation
F84 Pervasive developmental disorder
COST OF CURRENT CARE
14 staff - £373,040
18. COSTINGS FOR INTENSIVE SUPPORT/SPECIAL PROJECT CARE
19. DISCUSSION
Individual intensive support package costs between 2 to 4 times that of other patients in
Calderstones. They are funded by the Secure Commissioning Team who set a budget of 2 million,
which is closely monitored.
Districts are going to have a dilemma to fund expensive individual care or to focus on more
general provision for service users.
High numbers of staff are involved which can be found from the large pool of skilled experienced
workers within the hospital institution. Individual community care packages run the risk of staff
burn out and need to use agency or bank staff to cover sickness and holidays.
They do not have access to large numbers of experienced skilled, trained staff.
The way forward for complex community care packages would be to design services to provide
for small numbers, for example 3 to 5 individual staffed flats within one site. One district could
potentially sell the resource to other districts ,or there could be joint funding.
20.
These facilities could be seen as a step in rehabilitation or, for some individuals, long term
providers.
All the patients presented lacked capacity to consent to the physical restraint that was needed
at times to manage physical aggression. They were in receipt of 24 hour supervision with
restriction of their liberty. It is debateable as to how these restrictions could best be legally
supported through the Mental Health Act, supervised community treatment order or
Guardianship, or through the Mental Capacity legislation.
In all cases there would be concerns about emergency admissions to general adult psychiatric
provisions, when a place of safety may be the intervention required.
Community care staff would need to be skilled and confident in using physical restraint
techniques in the least restrictive way. They would need knowledge and experience in managing
individuals with autism or head injury.
21.
The current emphasis on normalisation and inclusion does not encompass risk management
and mitigation. The patients presented all potentially place themselves and others at risk
through their behaviour. They are sensitive to overstimulation and each patient requires
their individual needs and risks to be recognised and managed.
Intensive support packages can be demonstrated to significantly reduce the harm to patients
and to others. Commissioners need to understand that it is not always possible to reduce these
risks and reduce costs of care.
Some of these packages may be needed for considerate periods of time to maximise the
quality of life of the service user and manage risks to the care providers.