1 / 8

Expectations vs. Reality The Banshee

Expectations vs. Reality The Banshee. Flight Data. Motor – J800T, 1280ns Total Impulse, 1.9 sec burn time Apogee – 2754 feet @ 12.95 seconds Main – 697 feet @ 51.4 seconds Touchdown – 73.7 seconds. Other Example Altimeter Readings. Simulation vs. Reality. Diameter Discrepancy.

phong
Download Presentation

Expectations vs. Reality The Banshee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Expectations vs. Reality The Banshee

  2. Flight Data Motor – J800T, 1280ns Total Impulse, 1.9 sec burn time Apogee – 2754 feet @ 12.95 seconds Main – 697 feet @ 51.4 seconds Touchdown – 73.7 seconds

  3. Other Example Altimeter Readings

  4. Simulation vs. Reality

  5. Diameter Discrepancy • Public Missiles Phenolic Airframe Tubing Spec – 3.962” • Public Missiles Pre-Glassed Phenolic Airframe Tubing Spec – 3.995” • As used – PML Phenolic Airframe Tubing w/2 layers of Giant Leap “fiberglass sock” – measured at 4.25” (after flight) • Fin can also has an additional 2oz layer of fiberglass

  6. Lift Off Weight Discrepancy • Design 10.6 lbs • Weights defaulted from Rocksim • I Assumed 8z for paint and epoxy • Actual 17.7 lbs • Slightly underestimated several components • Considerably underestimated paint and epoxy • Fiberglassing not in original estimate, probably about 3 lbs • Aprox 1 lb of epoxy + foam • Easily 15 cans of primer and paint used…

  7. Peak Altitude Discrepancy • Initial Design – 5426 Feet • Lower weight • 4” diameter smooth profile • Wind estimated 8-14mph • .5” motor overhang • Constructed – 3147 Feet • Correct weight • 4” diameter smooth profile assumed • Wind estimated 8-14mph • .5” motor overhang • Post Op – 2754 feet actual, ran simulation again – result of 2817 feet • Correct weight • 4.25” diameter – turbulent transition from nose cone • Actual wind – upper end (14+mph) – more weather cocking • .5” motor RESESS – CG forward – more weather cocking • Launch rod tilted 5deg into the wind (est. from photos)

  8. Landing Velocity Discrepancy • 9’ home-made parabolic cupped design • Design from Rocket Team Vatsaas (http://vatsaas.org/rtv/) • Assumed cD of 1.5 (from their website) • Should have brought down 18 lb rocket at 19fps • Richard Nakka’s Experimental Rocketry website has a detailed dissertation on parachutes, suggesting a more reasonable cD of .6 • A cD of .6 on an 18 lb rocket results in 29fps, which matches my result

More Related