230 likes | 242 Views
Learn the key patterns and strategies for building and implementing data warehouses, as well as how to leverage Microsoft's SQL technologies for an easier life. This talk covers hardware considerations, schema design hints, partitioning and indexing strategies, and data maintenance best practices.
E N D
Making Data Warehouse Easy Conor Cunningham – Principal Architect Thomas Kejser – Principal PM
Introduction We build and implement Data Warehouses (and the engines that run them) We also fix DWs that others build This talk covers the key patterns we use We will also show you how you can make your life easier with Microsoft’s SQL technologies
What World do you Live in? Hardware should be bought when I know the details I can’t wait for you to figure all that out Do it, NOW! I need to know my hardware CAPEX before I decide to invest
Sketch a Rough Model • Define Roughly on Business Problem • Decide on Dimensions • Dim columns can wait • Build Dimension/Fact Matrix
Estimate Storage ≈ 4B ≈ 8B ≈ 1/3 or sp_estimate_compression
Why Integer Keys are Cheaper Smaller row sizes More rows/page= more compression Faster to join Faster in column stores
Pick Standard HW Configuration • Small (GB to low TB) : Business Decision Appliance • Medium (up to 80TB): Fast Track • Large (100s of TB): PDW • Note: Elastic scale plus for lower sizes too! • Careful with sizes, some are listed pre-compression
Server Config / File Layout Follow FT Guidance! You probably don’t need to do anything else
Why does Fast Track/PDW Work? • Warehouses are I/O hungry • GB/sec • This is high (in a SAN terms) • We did the HW testing for you • Guidance on data layout
Implement Prototype Model • Design schema • Analyse data quality with DQS/Excel • Probably not what you expected to find! • Start with small data samples!
Schema Tool Discussion! SSMS with Schema Designer SQL Server Data Tools
Prototyping Hints Customer Type 1 Customer Type 2 Generate INTEGER keys out of strings keys with hash Focus on Type 1 Dimensions PowerPivot/Excel to show data fast Drive conversation with end users!
Prototype: What users will teach you • They will change/refocus their mind when they see the actual data • You have probably forgotten some dimension data • You may have misestimated data sizes
Schema Design Hints • Build Star Schema • Beginners may want to avoid snowflakes (most of our users just use star) • Implement a Date Table (use INT key in YYYYMMDD format) • Fact.MyDate BETWEEN 20000000 AND 20009999 • Fact.MyDate BETWEEN ‘2000-01-01’ and ‘2000-12-31’ • YEAR(Fact.MyDate ) = 2000 • Identity, Sequences • Usually you can validate PK/FK Constraints during load and avoid them in the model • Fact Table – fixed sized columns, declared NOT NULL (if possible) • For ColumnStore, data types need to be the basic ones…
Why Facts/Dimensions? • Optimizers have a tough job • Our QO generates star joins early in search • We look for the star join pattern to do this • 1 big table, dimensions joined to it… • Following this pattern will help you • Reduced compilation time • Better plan quality (average) • You can look at the plans and see whether the optimizer got the “right” shape • Wrong Plan your query is non-standard OR perhaps QO messed up!
Partition/Index the Model • Partition fact by load window • Fact cluster/heap? • Cluster fact on seek key • Cluster fact on date column (if cardinality > partitions) • Leave as heap • Column Store index on • All columns of fact • Columns of large dim • Cluster the Dim on Key
If(followedpattern) {expect …} • Star Join Shape • << get plan .bmp>> • Properties: • Usually all Hash Joins • Parallelism • Bitmaps • Join dimensions together, then scan Fact • Indexes on filtered Dim columns helpful if they are covering
The Approximate Plan • Hash Stream Aggregate Partial Aggregate Hash Join Batch Build Dim Seek Dim Scan Hash Join Batch Build Fact CSI Scan
Column Store Plan Shapes • For ColumnStore, it’s the same shape • Minor differences • Batch mode (Not Row Mode) • Parallelism works differently • Converts to row mode above the star join shape • If you don’t get a batch mode plan, performance is likely to be much slower (usually this implies a schema design issue or a plan costing issue) • Partitioning Sliding Window works well with ColumnStore (especially since the table must be is readonly)
Data Maintenance • Statistics • Add manually on Correlated Columns • Update fact statistics after ETL load • Leave Dim to auto update • Rebuilding indexes? • Probably not needed • If needed, make part of ETL load • Switch out old partitions and drop switch target • Automate this
Serve the Data • Self Service • Tabular / Dimensional Cubes • Excel / PowerPivot / PowerView • Fixed Reports • Reporting Services • PowerView • Don’t clean data in “serving engines” • Materialisepost-cleaned data as column in relational source
! ?