690 likes | 851 Views
Perceptions About Raw Milk Consumption. Milk Consumption. Although milk is not universal, it is one of the most widely consumed foods that humans get from other animals [get map from harris chapter]
E N D
Milk Consumption • Although milk is not universal, it is one of the most widely consumed foods that humans get from other animals [get map from harris chapter] • Evolutionarily, milk is a complete and well balanced food for infants of the species that biological verity has been extended to a view that milk is “the ideal food for humans, particularly to sustain growth in children, fetal growth in pregnant women, and milk production during lactation” and that “nature’s most perfect food”
Milk Consumption • Historically, milk was drunk raw or preserved • Raw milk sours because of natural lactobacilli • Cultures that drank milk dealt with spoilage and long term storage in several ways • Consumed immediately or boiled for later use • Yoghurt, cheese, buttermilk, sour cream • Possibility of acquired immunity to zoonotic pathogens through care of farm animals • Pasteurization has two functions • Kills spoilage organisms that sour milk • Kills pathogens that can cause serious illness
Traditional View of Milk Practiced in Bangladesh Today • Dairying is practiced in Bangladesh as a part of local crop livestock farming systems, typically involving involving one or two animals and half an acre of land • The cows are mostly maintained as bull mothers and to produce a little surplus of milk (0.5–1.5 liters daily) for household consumption • Some fermented milk products, such as yogurt, cheese, buttermilk, and sour cream, are produced by traditional methods
Origin of Microbial Contaminants • At the point of milking, microorganisms in milk come from animal body surfaces, feed, air, water, and utensils and equipment used for milking and storage • The main causes of increased bacterial count during transportation of milk are contamination due to inadequately cleaned vehicles • There are also occasionally pathogens in the teats, e.g., Mycobacterium bovis (tuberculosis), M. johnei (paratuberculosis), S. aureus (mastitis)
Contamination of Raw Milk • The main causes of increased bacterial count during transportation of milk are contamination due to inadequately cleaned vehicles • Inclusion of milk from a single farm with high bacterial counts can have a significant event on the total colony count of tanker milk as well
Pasteurization • Pasteurization involves the heating of milk to a temperature of 71.7oC for a period of 15 seconds (or for a similar combination of temperature and time) • Most milk sold in developed countries is pasteurized • Farming families are typically exempt • A relatively small number of people defend their right to drink raw (unpasteurized) milk • Therefore, most European countries and more than half of the U.S. states allow the sale of raw milk even if the volume is very low
Pasteurization • Part of broader movement for public health and liberal welfare state • Pasteurization is incorporated into food regulations in UK, other European countries, Canada, U.S.
Current Federal Regulations and Policy in the United States • United States restricted the sale of raw milk products since the 1940s • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services banned the interstate shipment of raw milk in 1986
Current Federal Regulations and Policy in the United States - FDA and CDC • The health risks associated with the consumption of raw milk far outweigh any benefits derived from its consumption. • There are numerous documented outbreaks of milkborne disease involving Salmonella and Campylobacter , E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes , Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica infections directly linked to the consumption of unpasteurized milk in the past 20 years
Current Regulations in France • In France, the sale of raw milk destined for human consumption is authorized but strictly controlled by a ruling of the Ministry of Agriculture of 1985, which provides for different levels of restrictions. • unblemished record of no brucellosis and tuberculosis (annual tuberculin testing) • strict hygienic conditions regarding local equipment (accommodation, local storage of milk), animal husbandry, good practice, cooling of milk, and cleaning/disinfection of material • well maintained register of the health of individual consignments and identification of livestock
Current Regulations in France • Raw milk is a category of "foods that have not undergone decontamination treatment or are susceptible to recontamination after treatment“ • Listeria monocytogenes will be absent at the time of production, and not exceed 100 organisms per gram at the time of consumption
The Case For Untreated Milk by Dr. B. M. Pickard, The University of Leeds • “There is no doubt that heat-treatment [pasteurization] is detrimental to milk • Evidence shows that untreated milk has a higher nutritional value providing more available vitamins and minerals than pasteurized milk • It contains anti-infective agents which can both restrict the growth of contaminating bacteria in the milk and give the consumer protection • Not at least, it has a better flavor, with none of the deterioration in quality caused by heat treatment.”
Capital Press, the Pacific Northwest’s Premier Agricultural Newspaper, May, 2004 • “The increasing concentration of the dairy industry is leading to the demise of small family-owned dairy farms and the domestic dairy industry, said dairy farmers from around the nation who met with New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer • The dairy farmers, who came from throughout the Northeast and as far away as Wisconsin and California, called on Spitzer to take the national lead and begin investigating industry consolidation in New York for possible antitrust violations.”
The Association Fromages de Terroir, France • “At least 50 cheese varieties have disappeared in the past 30 years and many more are on their way out • EU regulations are strangling the production of cheeses made with unpasteurised milk • "Pasteurising makes for bland and mediocre cheese, but because of unfounded hysteria over bacteria such as listeria, which is not dangerous except to particular vulnerable groups, we are killing a fabulous product."
Weston A. Price Foundation Promotes Raw Milk • This bases its reputation on the teachings of Weston A. Price, a dentist working in Cleveland in the 1930s who claimed that raw milk is healthier. dentist who visited 14 cultures and studied the impacts of their traditional diets • The Weston A. Price Foundation is lead today by Nancy Fallon, a frequent speaker at organic conferences and other holistic health and alternative agriculture events
Weston A. Price Foundation Promotes Raw Milk • She says “Both raw and pasteurized milk harbor bacteria, but the bacteria in raw milk is the healthy bacteria of lactic-acid fermentation while the bacteria in pasteurized milk is the bacteria of spoilage.”
Weston A. Price Foundation Promotes Raw Milk • This is vehemently disagreed with by Dennis Avery who is a senior fellow for Hudson Institute in Indianapolis and the Director of the Center for Global Food Issues. He was formerly a senior policy analyst for the U.S. Department of State • He is opposed to any organic or natural food group because he feels there claims are not justified
California Court Ruling Against Alta Dena Dairy • The Superior Court found in 1989 that: • (a) "overwhelming evidence proved that Alta-Dena's raw (unpasteurized) milk frequently contains dangerous bacteria that can cause serious illness"; • (b) the company must stop its false advertising - selling and promoting raw milk as healthier
The National Health Council Against Health Fraud • "The evidence is clear. Milk is a wholesome food, but there is nothing to be gained from drinking it in its raw, natural form. (Raw milk) poses a serious health risk to significant segments of the population. Only pasteurized milk should be sold for general public consumption."
Public Health Veterinarian Coalition Committee • Recommends that only pasteurized milk/products be consumed or sold • Many human pathogens have been documented in raw milk (e.g., Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Listeria, Brucella, E. coli). • Consumption of raw milk products has been identified as an important risk factors for E. coli 0157:H7. • Pasteurization of milk/products prior to sale is not required in all states
Wisconsin Cow Leasing Program Ended in Illness • Since the sale of unpasteurized milk is illegal in Wisconsin, farmer Tim Wightman of Hayward sold shares in his cows, so the milk “belonged” to the share owners • Wisconsin organic dairy farm has been forced to end a complex “cow-boarding” scheme that enabled 250 “shareholders” to get otherwise-illegal raw milk—but not before 70 people were sickened by Campylobacter
Ontario Rules Against Cow Leasing Program • Ontario government to allow farmers to drink unpasteurized milk while claiming that it would endanger public health for consumers to do the same • Ontario Board decided against “lease-a-cow” program, where consumers paid them for an animal's feed and upkeep, and in return gained access to raw milk and milk products
Ontario Rules Against Cow Leasing Program • One farmer pleaded guilty to charges of selling unpasteurized milk • he was fined $3,500 and ordered to dismantle the dairy operation within 30 days • almost immediately, the insurance company cancelled the Schmidts' liability and fire insurance, and no other company would take them on. • caught in an impossible situation, they were forced to sell their herd
The Question • Is this position is still valid for an industrialized world where there is ample supply of relatively cheap milk and we have the ability to eliminate infectious foodborne disease? • Or do we let a small group of people have the choice of a product they want whether or not there are good scientific arguments for it?
Regulation of Milk Sanitation Is Contested (Ten Eyck, 2004) • Claimed advantages of pasteurization • Reduce mortality and morbidity • [do we know much about m/m due to milk @ 1900] • Delivered in sanitary containers from licensed dairies • First step toward large scale dairy farms, dairies, and dairy industry • Others claimed disadvantages • Destroys some of nutritional values (vitamins) • Diminishes organoleptic values • Makes it very difficult for farmers to sell their own milk to consumers • Makes it difficult for farmers to form dairy cooperatives to sell their own milk
Population Surveys in England and Wales • England and Wales decided to conduct a survey of its population on a ban on raw milk consumption as recommended by the UK government through its advisory committee • 5,000 such responses were received in England • 500 responses were received in Wales from consumers and producers objecting to the proposed ban • Only 20 responses in England and 2 in Wales supported the proposed ban • Most of the responses supporting a ban were from public health professionals
Association of Unpasteurized Milk Producers and Consumers • Evidence shows that heat treatment has detrimental effect on taste and on nutritional value • More work is needed on effect of heat treatment on allergic reactions • That untreated milk contains anti-infective agents which protect against infectious disease, and that these are destroyed by heat-treatment • That untreated milk is sometimes wrongly blamed for outbreaks of foodborne illness, and that other foods are far more likely to be the vehicle of infection
Association of Unpasteurized Milk Producers and Consumers • That pasteurized milk can be contaminated with pathogens • That the way ahead is not to ban, but to ensure that untreated milk contains the lowest possible levels of bacteria, and that it has been proved that farmers can produce clean milk. Therefore, though it is reasonable to penalize those with poor hygiene standards, it is wrong to suggest that all milk should be heat-treated because of these isolated outbreaks
Campaign for Real Milk • Retail raw milk of higher quality than much milk sent for pasteurization because of controls on production • Accepts presence of pathogens but claims infection from these minimal, and that raw milk carries beneficial anti-microbial agents • Various health claims for raw milk, including higher vitamin content than pasteurized milk, immune system-strengthening enzymes, and reduced allergenicity, and argues that there are health concerns associated with heat treated milk (such as bowel disorders)
Campaign for Real Milk • Has legal advice that a ban would be contrary to EU law, and that current controls may also be incompatible with EU law • States that in the event of a ban, consumption of imports and milk from ‘house cows’ would increase, increasing the risks to health • Opposes a ban and supports better labeling option, but would want to see claimed health benefits also included
United Kingdom • EU legislation allows national rules prohibiting or restricting the placing of the market within its territory of raw milk or raw cream intended for direct human consumption • The vast majority of milk consumed throughout the UK is pasteurized • Each UK country has a different approach • Scotland has a total ban • England and Wales and Northern Ireland allows some raw milk consumption • Surveys reopened issue
UK ADAS Survey in 1995/96 • Of 1591 samples, over 60% of the samples taken contained indicators of faecal contamination • In addition, 7% of samples contained Staphylococcus aureus, 2% contained Listeria monocytogenes, and one sample contained Salmonella • Another study detected Campylobacter in 6% of a total of 985 samples
The Public Health Laboratory Service (PHLS) Survey 1996/1997 • Of 1132 raw milk samples, 3.7% contained various pathogens including E.coli O157 (3 samples), Campylobacter (21 samples), and Salmonella (5 samples)
UK Advisory Committee on Microbiological Safety of Foods • In 1997, the ACMSF expressed concern that the surveys showed that raw cow drinking milk carried significant amounts of micro-organisms indicative of fecal contamination, as well as, in some cases, foodborne pathogens • The Committee concluded that the sale of such milk in England, Wales and Northern Ireland should be banned, as it already was in Scotland
Organic Associations and Farmers • Frustration at further consultation so soon after the result of the previous exercise, with no reason to believe opinion has changed • States risks have reduced since controls strengthened • States that presence in milk of microorganisms indicative of fecal contamination does not necessarily indicate a health risk, and that pasteurization destroys, nutrients, enzymes and other anti-bacterial mechanisms as well as pathogens
Organic Associations and Farmers • Notes belief held by some that homogenization associated with increased risk of heart disease, though notes that evidence is inconclusive, and that unpasteurized milk is one of the few choices available to people who want ‘non-homogenized milk’ • A ban would drive sales underground, increasing the risk, and would damage organic dairy producers • Believes in freedom of choice, and states that unpasteurized milk contains more vitamins than pasteurized, and also contains microbes that build immunity
Organic Associations and Farmers • Argues that figures on foodborne illness show that milk (including unpasteurized) is safer than many other foods (such as burgers, eggs) • States that strict controls already apply to unpasteurized milk, suggests that if there is a problem with individual producers, powers exist to tackle them • Believes that this should be considered in wider context of the impact of intensive farming methods which create many potential health problems, and that FSA should be promoting alternatives to such methods
Arguments Counter the Raw Milk Advocates • Freedom of choice is a political, philosophical or emotional matter that largely ignores the evidence of hazard and risk • Appreciation of risk is often poor among the public, even among those who are especially susceptible (Heathcock et al 1998) • There is loss of some nutritional factors but these are readily available from alternative sources in the normal diet, without the need for supplementation (Potter et al 1984)
Perceptions for Drinking Raw Milk • It tastes better than pasteurized milk which is bland and has much goodness removed • Knows where it comes from (local supplier), and values its traceability • Pleased that it is tested regularly • Wishes to retain freedom to choose approved retail raw milk (green top) • Values freedom to be able to choose an alternative • Purchases from local supplier, values traceability this offers
Perceptions for Drinking Raw Milk • Believes green top builds immunity, and argues that there is evidence that overprotecting makes us more susceptible to germs and to allergies • Accepts there is a risk but believes it to be insufficient to warrant a ban • States the market is small, those who consume unpasteurized milk choose to do so understanding the risks involved
Perceptions for Drinking Raw Milk • Travels to buy organic untreated milk (objects to term ‘raw’) and cheese – says it is organic, better quality and the source is known • Argues that heat treatment will eventually lead to emergence of heat resistant pathogens (compares to emergence of superbugs in hospitals) • Sees main issue as freedom of choice – supply already very restricted, and consumption could never be stopped completely
What Are the Arguments in Favor of Raw Milk? • These are primarily: • · the perceived organoleptic superiority of the raw product; • · health and nutritional benefits (that heating destroys beneficial nutrient factors); • · that raw milk has inherently improved keeping quality or anti-bacterial properties; • · freedom of choice
De Louvois & Rampling. Brit Med J 1998 • "If the cow had been designed with HACCP for the dairy industry in mind it is unlikely that the udder would have been placed where it is."
Availability of Raw Milk – Where Do We Go from Here? • Are these the choices? • Total ban • Unlimited access to raw milk • Controlled raw milk supply with herd testing • Retail sales with labeling and education indicating the risks • Shared/leased cow supply permitted • Farmers’ families only