1 / 7

Russell’s Paradox

Russell’s Paradox. Emre ERDOĞAN 01.03.2011 CMPE 220. In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox was discovered by Bertrand Arthur William Russell (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970) in 1901 .

pillow
Download Presentation

Russell’s Paradox

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Russell’sParadox Emre ERDOĞAN 01.03.2011 CMPE 220

  2. In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox was discovered by Bertrand Arthur William Russell(18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970) in 1901. • The same paradox had been discovered a year before by Ernst Friedrich Ferdinand Zermelo(July 27, 1871 – May 21, 1953)but he did not publish the idea.

  3. The Paradox Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If R qualifies as a member of itself, it would contradict its own definition as a set containing sets that are not members of themselves. On the other hand, if such a set is not a member of itself, it would qualify as a member of itself by the same definition. This contradiction is Russell's paradox.

  4. Russell-like Paradoxes • Russell's paradox is not hard to extend. We can take a transitive verb <V>, that can be applied to its substantive form and thenwe can form the sentence: The <V>er that <V>s all (and only those) who don't <V> themselves.

  5. An example would be “kiss": The kisser that kisses all (and only those) that don't kiss themselves. • or “punish" The punisher that punishes all that don't punish themselves.

  6. Paradoxes that fall in this scheme The barber with "shave". The original Russell's paradox with "contain": The container (Set) that contains all (containers) that don't contain themselves. The Grelling–Nelson paradox with "describer": The describer (word) that describes all words, that don't describe themselves. Richard's paradox with "denote": The denoter (number) that denotes all denoters (numbers) that don't denote themselves.

  7. References • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_paradox • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grelling–Nelson_paradox • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Zermelo • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punisher

More Related