160 likes | 349 Views
Asia and Europe: Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration. EU and ASEAN. Greek Crisis, East Asia Summit. EU & ASEAN: Similarities. Began as Political Projects Moved on to Economic Focus Functional Development Intergovernmental, Summit Process
E N D
Asia and Europe: Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration
EU & ASEAN: Similarities • Began as Political Projects • Moved on to Economic Focus • Functional Development • Intergovernmental, Summit Process • Outreach to Neighboring Countries, other regional organizations • Broader, Deeper, Better
EU & ASEAN: Differences • Primary Drivers: Economics vs. Politics • Stepwise Process vs. Long Latent Period • Build up of Bureaucracy vs. Crisis-driven entity • Supranationalism vs. Inter-governmentalism • Political Equality vs. Concentric Rings
Major Theories of European Integration • Functionalism • Neo-Functionalism • Inter-governmentalism • Liberal Inter-governmentalism
Other Theories of European Integration • Institutionalism • Constitutionalism • Federalism • Regulationism • Multi-level Governance • Polycentric Governance • Neo-neo-functionalism
Problems Applying European Ideas • Mercosur’s Political Process • ASEAN’s Differences Specificity of European Conditions Crisis-driven development Regional Transformation No aims for high-level integration
Elements of Asian Integration Theory Existing Theories: • Functionalism • Neo-functionalism • Inter-governmentalism • Liberal Inter-governmentalism Other Theories Don’t Apply
Traditional I.R. Theory • Realism • Neo-realism • Liberalism/Neo-liberalism • World Systems Theory • Constructivism Which provides the most useful approach?
A Model of Asian Integration • Politics Economics • Punctuated Equilibrium Crisis-driven Regionalism • Strong Inter-governmentalism • Concentric Grouping 1) ASEAN, 2) ASEAN+3, 3) ASEAN+6, 4) ASEAN+8, 5) SCO, SAARC