1 / 14

The Special Case of Email

The Special Case of Email. John Gregory and Dan Michaluk January 24, 2011. Outline. Let’s deal with the following four challenges Managing email Locating email Accessing email Proving email. But First… What’s an Email Nowadays?. Stored, text-based communications today

pippa
Download Presentation

The Special Case of Email

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Special Case of Email John Gregory and Dan MichalukJanuary 24, 2011

  2. Outline • Let’s deal with the following four challenges • Managing email • Locating email • Accessing email • Proving email

  3. But First… What’s an Email Nowadays? • Stored, text-based communications today • SMTP communications – “classic email” • Computer generated faxes • Webmail, Webmail via social networking application • Multi User Domains • Text messages • VOIP communications

  4. Managing Email (The Litigator’s View) • This is a problem for corporations • Retention policies are key • Email servers not ordinarily a business records repository • Email can be on a “short list” for retention • Pressure to move it off server, sometimes auto-delete • Limit: likely be relevant to reasonably anticipated litigation • This can be a discovery or trial issue • Remmington (1998) – Common law duty to preserve? • Broccoli v. Echostar (2005) – 21-day retention of e-mails

  5. Locating Email • Pre-confrontation • Email server • Lotus Domino, MS Exchange, GroupWise • Mobile messaging server • BES • Network “clients” • Post-confrontation • Mobile Devices • Application-based communications • Company owned peripheral storage devices …on the corporate network in an investigation

  6. Locating Email • Individual controlled • Personal e-mail accounts • Home computers • Third-party controlled • Telecommunications providers • Application providers …outside the corporate network Alex Cameron’s presentation covered access to these sources

  7. Accessing Email • On the corporate network • Law has recognized a virtually unfettered right of employer access • Basis – ownership of system plus notification • Likely to see a greater balancing of interests • Corporations should consider • Routine monitoring based on special grounds • Periodic audits with controls • Investigations based on reasonable suspicion

  8. Accessing Email • Recent cases • Quon – 2010, Supreme Court of the United States • R. v. Cole – 2009, Ontario Superior Court of Justice • France v. Tfaily – 2010, Ontario Court of Appeal • City of Ottawa – 2010, Divisional Court

  9. Accessing Email • Employee communicates with counsel on employer systems • A practical problem for employer counsel among others • Key Canadian cases • Daniel Potter – 2005, Nova Scotia Supreme Court • Eisses v. CPL – 2009, Ontario Superior Court of Justice • Counsel’s obligations are clear • But the ultimate right of access is a matter of fact • Is it better to attack basis for privilege than argue waiver?

  10. Proving Email • Email problem #1 – You didn’t send that • Employee alleges termination on basis of pregnancy • Email pre-dates her pregnancy by two months showing bona fide intent to terminate • Employee says the e-mail is fabricated How would you prove the email?

  11. Proving Email • Email problem #2 – I didn’t send that • Agreement to arbitrate executed through intranet • Execution by entering employee ID number plus password then clicking through • Supervisors can reset passwords • Supervisor resets password to help employee get access • Email confirmation sent to employee • Employee claims supervisor executed agreement and denies reading confirmation email How would you prove the email?

  12. Proving Email • Cloud based communications are harder to authenticate • Authenticate (go to ISP and not ASP) • Figure out and prove the “system” whose reliability one would like to count on (or at least appreciate) • No standardization – every application works differently • Consumer oriented – so less rigorous than business systems • Proprietary – so code etc. are not readily available • Surrounded by TP apps – Tweetdeck, thousands of FB suppliers, who, where and what are they? • Are cloud providers in the ordinary course of business, i.e. should they be considered reliable?

  13. Resources • www.stephenmason.eu • John’s webpage (linked through Slaw) • www.allaboutinformation.ca • George L. Paul, Foundations of Digital Evidence • Charles Morgan, E-Mail Law

  14. The Special Case of Email John Gregory and Dan MichalukJanuary 24, 2011

More Related