1 / 36

COURSE: JUST 3900 INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Instructor: Dr. John J. Kerbs, Associate Professor Joint

COURSE: JUST 3900 INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Instructor: Dr. John J. Kerbs, Associate Professor Joint Ph.D. in Social Work and Sociology. Chapter 17: The Chi-Square Statistic. Parametric & Nonparametric Tests.

platt
Download Presentation

COURSE: JUST 3900 INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Instructor: Dr. John J. Kerbs, Associate Professor Joint

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COURSE: JUST 3900 INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Instructor: Dr. John J. Kerbs, Associate Professor Joint Ph.D. in Social Work and Sociology Chapter 17: The Chi-Square Statistic

  2. Parametric & Nonparametric Tests • Chapter 17 introduces two non-parametric hypothesis tests using the chi-square statistic: • the chi-square test for goodness of fit • the chi-square test for independence. • Chapter 17 also describes two ways of evaluating effect sizes for non-parametric tests • Phi-Coefficients (ɸ) • Cramer’s V (V)

  3. Parametric & Nonparametric Tests • The term "non-parametric" refers to the fact that the chi‑square tests do not • 1. require assumptions about population parameters, or • 2. test hypotheses about population parameters. • Previous examples of hypothesis tests, such as the t tests and analysis of variance, are parametric testsand they do include assumptions about parameters and hypotheses about parameters.

  4. Parametric & Nonparametric Tests • The most obvious difference between the chi‑square tests and the other hypothesis tests we have considered (t and ANOVA) is the nature of the data. • For chi‑square tests, the data are frequencies for nominal- or ordinal-level data • T-tests and ANOVA examine numerical scores for interval- or ratio-level data • Chi-Square tests have few (if any) assumptions • Thus, often called “distribution-free tests”

  5. The Chi-Square Test for Goodness-of-Fit • TEST #1:chi-square test for goodness-of-fituses frequency data from a sample to test hypotheses about the shape or proportions of a population. • Each individual in the sample is classified into one category on the scale of measurement • Nominal- or ordinal-level data • The data, called observed frequencies, simply count how many individuals from the sample are in each category.

  6. Situations for Transforming Scores into Categories • Appropriate times for transforming interval- or ratio-level data into nominal- or ordinal-level data for Chi-Square analyses • 1. When it is easier to obtain categorical measurements • 2. Original interval- or ratio-level variables violate assumptions for t-tests and ANOVA • 3. Original interval- or ratio-level scores have high variance, which can be removed by collapsing interval- or ratio-level scores into nominal or ordinal categories.

  7. The Chi-Square Test for Goodness-of-Fit • The null hypothesis specifies the proportion of the population that should be in each category. Examples: • H0: No preference among different categories, equal proportions • H1: Preference among different categories with the population not divided into equal proportions • H0: No difference in between the proportions for one population and the known proportions for another population • H1: Population proportions are not equal to the values specified by the null hypothesis • The proportions from the null hypothesis are used to compute expected frequencies (fe) that describe how the sample would appear if it were in perfect agreement with the null hypothesis.

  8. Three Ways of Depicting Frequency Distributions NOTE: Frequency Table Approach NOTE: Bar-Graph Approach NOTE: Boxed Frequencies Approach

  9. Chi-Square Test for Independence • TEST #2:chi-square test for independence, can be used and interpreted in two different ways: • Testing hypotheses about the relationship between two variables in a population, or • Testing hypotheses about differences between proportions for two or more populations.

  10. Chi-Square Test for Independence Although these two versions of the test for independence appear to be different, they are equivalent and they are interchangeable. The first version of the test emphasizes the relationship between chi-square and a correlation, because both procedures examine the relationship between two variables. The second version of the test emphasizes the relationship between chi-square and an independent-measures t test (or ANOVA) because both tests use data from two (or more) samples to test hypotheses about the difference between two (or more) populations.

  11. Chi-Square Test for Independence The first version of the chi-square test for independence views the data as one sample in which each individual is classified on two different variables. The data are usually presented in a matrix with the categories for one variable defining the rows and the categories of the second variable defining the columns.

  12. Chi-Square Test for Independence The data, called observed frequencies, simply show how many individuals from the sample are in each cell of the matrix. The null hypothesis for this test states that there is no relationship (or no association) between the two variables; that is, the two variables are independent.

  13. Chi-Square Test for Independence The second version of the test for independence views the data as two (or more) separate samples representing the different populations being compared. The same variable is measured for each sample by classifying individual subjects into categories of the variable. The data are presented in a matrix with the different samples defining the rows and the categories of the variable defining the columns.

  14. Chi-Square Test for Independence The data, again called observed frequencies, show how many individuals are in each cell of the matrix. The null hypothesis for this test states that the proportions (the distribution across categories) are the same for all of the populations

  15. Chi-Square Test Statistic • Both chi-square tests use the same statistic. The calculation of the chi-square statistic requires two steps: • The null hypothesis is used to construct an idealized sample distribution of expected frequencies that describes how the sample would look if the data were in perfect agreement with the null hypothesis.

  16. Chi-Square Test Statistics NOTE: This n represents the total n for the entire sample in the matrix For the goodness of fit test, the expected frequency for each category is obtained by expected frequency = fe = pn (p is the proportion from the null hypothesis and n is the size of the sample) For the test for independence, the expected frequency for each cell in the matrix is obtained by (row total)(column total) expected frequency = fe = ──────────────── n

  17. Chi-Square Test Statistics 2. A chi-square statistic is computed to measure the amount of discrepancy between the ideal sample (expected frequencies from H0) and the actual sample data (the observed frequencies = fo). • A large discrepancy results in a large value for chi-square and indicates that the data do not fit the null hypothesis and the hypothesis should be rejected.

  18. Chi-Square Test Statistic The calculation of chi-square is the same for all chi-square tests: (fo – fe)2 chi-square = χ2 = Σ───── fe The fact that chi‑square tests do not require scores from an interval or ratio scale makes these tests a valuable alternative to the t tests, ANOVA, or correlation, because they can be used with data measured on a nominal or an ordinal scale.

  19. 4-Step Chi-Square TestGoodness of Fit • Question: It has long been known that offenders often commit crimes under the influence of drugs. A criminologist wants to examine the drug of choice for drug-involved offenders who committed crimes for which they were arrested while under the influence. A total of 50 drug-using arrestees are sampled and each was asked to indicate which drug was in their system at the time of their offense/arrest. The following data indicate how many arrestees were using any given category of drugs: • The question for this hypothesis test is whether there are any preferences among the four possible choices. Are any of the drugs reported more or less often than would be expected simply by chance?

  20. 4-Step Chi-Square TestGoodness of Fit • Step 1: • State the hypotheses and select the α level. For the chi-square test for goodness of fit, • H0 : In the general population of drug-using arrestees, there is no difference for the drug of choice at the time of arrest. • H1: In the general population of drug-using arrestees, one or more of the drugs is preferred as evidenced by their use at the time of arrest. • Alpha Level (α) = 0.05

  21. 4-Step Chi-Square TestGoodness of Fit • Step 2: • Locate the critical region for the chi-square (χ2) test for goodness of fit. • Step 2a: Find degrees of freedom (df = C – 1 = 4 – 1 = 3) • Step 2b: Use df (3) & alpha level (.05) to find critical value for χ2test crit = 7.81 Note: This value is found in Table B8 (The Chi-Square Distribution) on page 711

  22. 4-Step Chi-Square TestGoodness of Fit • Step 3: • Calculate the Chi-Square Statistic • Step 3a: Compute expected frequencies (fe) Null Hypothesis (H0) specifies proportions for each cell With a sample of 50 arrestees, the expected frequencies for each category of drugs is equal in proportion (25%) for all categories • Step 3b:fe = pn = .25(50) = 12.5 Note: p = proportion from null hypothesis (.25) and n = total number in sample (i.e., 50)

  23. 4-Step Chi-Square TestGoodness of Fit • Step 3: • Calculate the Chi-Square Statistic • Step 3c: Using observed frequencies (fo) and expected frequencies (fe), compute chi-square statistic Χ2 = ∑ Χ2 = + + + Χ2= + + + Χ2 = + + + Χ2 =

  24. 4-Step Chi-Square TestGoodness of Fit • Step 4: • State a Decision and a Conclusion • Given that the calculated chi-square value (χ2 = 8.08) is larger than the critical value for chi-square tests with df = 3 and α = .05 (crit = 7.81), we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there are significant differences among the four drugs, with some selected more often and others less often than would be expected by chance.

  25. 4-Step Chi-Square Testfor Independence • Purpose for test: • Use frequency data from the sample to evaluate the relationship between two variables in the population. Each individual in the sample is classified on both of the two variables, which creates a two-dimensional frequency-distribution matrix. The frequency distribution for the sample is then used to test hypotheses about the corresponding frequency distribution for the population.

  26. 4-Step Chi-Square Testfor Independence • Question: It has long been known that offenders who commit misdemeanors and felonies often commit crimes under the influence of drugs. A criminologist wants to examine the drug of choice for drug-involved offenders who committed crimes for which they were arrested while under the influence. A total of 140 offenders (some were arrested for felonies while others were arrested for misdemeanors) are sampled and each was asked to indicate the nature of their arrest and which drug was in their system at the time of their offense/arrest. The following data indicate how many arrestees were using any given category of drugs: • The question for this hypothesis test is whether there are any preferences among the four possible choices for these two groups. Are any of the drugs reported more or less often than would be expected simply by chance?

  27. 4-Step Chi-Square Testfor Independence • Step 1: • State the hypotheses and select the α level (α= 0.05). For the chi-square test for independence, • H0 : There is no relationship between the two variables • H1: There is a relationship between the two variables • H0: For the general population of arrestees, there is no relationship between offense type (misdemeanor versus felony) and the type of drugs that were reported as being used at the time of arrest • H1 : For the general population of arrestees, there is a relationship between offense type (misdemeanor versus felony) and the type of drugs that were reported as being used at the time of arrest • H0 : In the population of arrestees, the proportions in the distribution of drugs reported as being used at the time of arrest for misdemeanors are not different from the proportions in the distribution of drugs reported as being used by arrestees at the time of arrest for felonies.

  28. 4-Step Chi-Square Testfor Independence • Step 2: • Locate the critical region for the chi-square (χ2) test for independence. • Step 2a: Find degrees of freedom [df = (2 - 1) * (4 – 1)= 1*3 = 3) • Step 2b: Use df (3) & alpha level (.05) to find critical value for χ2test of independence crit = 7.81 Note: This value is found in Table B8 (The Chi-Square Distribution) on page 711

  29. 4-Step Chi-Square Testfor Independence • Step 3: • Calculate the Chi-Square Statistic • Step 3a: Compute expected frequencies where fe= Note that fc = frequency total for column Note that fr= frequency total for row Note that n = number of arrestees in total sample

  30. 4-Step Chi-Square Testfor Independence • Step 3: Calculate the Chi-Square Statistic • Step 3c: Using expected frequencies below (fe) and observed frequencies (fo) in parentheses below, compute chi-square statistic Χ2 = ∑ Χ2 = + + + + + + + Χ2= + + + + + + + Χ2 = + + + + + + + Χ2 =

  31. 4-Step Chi-Square Testfor Independence • Step 4: • State a Decision and a Conclusion • Given that the calculated chi-square value (χ2 = 9.05) is larger than the critical value for chi-square tests with df = 3 and α = .05 (crit = 7.81), we reject the null hypothesis. • Thus, for the general population of arrestees, there is a relationship between offense type (misdemeanor versus felony) and the type of drugs that were reported as being used at the time of arrest

  32. Measuring Effect Size for the Chi-Square Test for Independence When both variables in the chi-square test for independence consist of exactly two categories (the data form a 2 x 2 matrix), it is possible to re-code the categories as 0 and 1 for each variable and then compute a correlation known as a phi-coefficient (ɸ)that measures the strength of the relationship.

  33. Measuring Effect Size for the Chi-Square Test for Independence The value of the phi-coefficient, or the squared value which is equivalent to an r 2, is used to measure the effect size. When there are more than two categories for one (or both) of the variables, then you can measure effect size using a modified version of the phi-coefficient known as Cramér’s V. The value of V is evaluated much the same as a correlation.

  34. Measuring Effect Size for the Chi-Square Test for Independence NOTE: If you square the phi-coefficient (ɸ2), you get the percentage of variance accounted for in the association between the two variables (gender and crime type). • Phi-coefficient (ɸ) is calculated as follows for a 2X2 matrix • Example: Consider a 2x2 matrix that is defined by gender (1 row for males and 1 row for females) and offense type (1 column for misdemeanors and 1 column for felonies). In this example, χ2 = 6.66, n=60, and we need ɸ • ɸ = = = 0.333 • NOTE: ɸ = 0.10 (small effect), 0.30 (medium effect),0.50 (large effect) • Note: If you increase sample sizes and keep proportions the same, the chi-square statistics will increase (more likely to reach significance), but phi-coefficients stay the same.

  35. Measuring Effect Size for the Chi-Square Test for Independence:Cramer’s V (Cohen, 1988) • Cramer’s V (V) is calculated for any matrix larger than 2X2 • The formula is a slight modification of the phi-coefficient • V = where n = total sample size and df* = the smaller of (R - 1) or (C - 1) NOTE: if df* = 1, then interpret the same as a 2X2 matrix for phi-coefficient effect-size cutoffs

  36. Assumptions and Restrictions for Chi-Square Tests • Failure to meet the assumptions of a statistical test can increase the possibility of Type I error and/or cause other problems. • Important Assumptions/Restrictions for Chi-Square Tests • 1. Independence of Observations: Each observed frequency is generated by a different individual. Each person can only produce a response that is categorized into one category. • 2. Size of Expected Frequencies: Do not perform chi-square tests on a matrix if one or more expected frequencies in any cell(s) is less than 5.

More Related