180 likes | 222 Views
The History of European Integration. One must begin by asking why the EU exists at all. There are historical, political and economic forces shaping its evolution The EU is not a new idea. It is centuries old. The Roman empire was the first substantive attempt to unify Europe.
E N D
One must begin by asking why the EU exists at all • There are historical, political and economic forces shaping its evolution • The EU is not a new idea. It is centuries old. • The Roman empire was the first substantive attempt to unify Europe. • The Roman Church adopted the same political ambitious. The Papacy was the first institution to use the concept of Europe in a political sense. It symbolized the Respublicana Christiana. • Charlemagne moulded a Holy Roman Empire around the idea.
The early Modern Period • The Early Modern period includes the centuries between the Middle Ages and the Industrial Revolution, roughly from 1500 to 1800, or from the discovery of the New World in 1492 to the French Revolution in 1789. The period is characterised by the rise to importance of science, the increasingly rapid technological progress, and the nation state. • Capitalist economies began their rise, beginning in northern Italian. The early modern period represents the decline of feudalism and the power of the Catholic Church. The period includes the disastrous Thirty Years' War and the European colonisation of the Americas.
Renaissance • The 14th century was also a time of great progress within the arts and sciences. A renewed interest in ancient Greek and Roman as well as more recent Arabic texts led to what has later been termed the Italian Renaissance. • The Renaissance was a cultural movement that profoundly affected European intellectual life in the early modern period. Beginning in Italy, and spreading to the north, west and middle Europe during a cultural lag of some two and a half centuries, its influence affected literature, philosophy, art, politics, science, history, religion, and other aspects of intellectual enquiry.
Crisis of the 17th century • The 17th century was an era of crisis. The Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) focused attention on the massive horrors that wars could bring to entire populations. The 1640s in particular saw more state breakdowns around the world than any previous or subsequent period. • In Britain the entire Stuart monarchy (England, Scotland, Ireland, and its North American colonies) rebelled. • More wars took place around the world in the mid-17th century than in almost any other period of recorded history. • The crises spread far beyond Europe—for example Ming China, the most populous state in the world, collapsed. The mid-17th century experienced almost unprecedented death rates. Environmental factors may have been in part to blame, especially global cooling.
Enlightenment • The Enlightenment was a powerful, widespread cultural movement of intellectuals beginning in late 17th-century Europe emphasizing the power of reason rather than tradition; • it was especially favourable to science (especially Isaac Newton's physics) and hostile to religious orthodoxy (especially of the Catholic Church). • It sought to analyze and reform society using reason, to challenge ideas grounded in tradition and faith, and to advance knowledge through the scientific method. • It promoted scientific thought, skepticism, and intellectual interchange. The Enlightenment was a revolution in human thought.
Industrial Revolution • The Industrial Revolution was a period in the late 18th century and early 19th century when major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, and transport affected socioeconomic . Technological advancements, most notably the invention of the steam engine were major catalysts in the industrialisation of the world. • It started in England and Scotland in the mid-18th century with the mechanisation of the textile industries, the development of iron-making techniques and the increased use of refined coal. • Trade expansion was enabled by the introduction of canals, improved roads and railways. • The effects spread throughout Western Europe and North America during the 19th century, eventually affecting most of the world. The impact of this change on society was enormous.
Nations rising • The political development of nationalism and the push for popular sovereignty culminated with the ethnic/national revolutions of Europe. During the 19th century nationalism became one of the most significant political and social forces in history; it is typically listed among the top causes of World War I. • Napoleon's conquests of the German and Italian states around 1800–1806 played a major role in stimulating nationalism and the demands for national unity.
Education • An important component of nationalism was the study of the nation's heritage, emphasizing the national language and literary culture. • Latin gave way to the national language, and compulsory education, with strong support from modernizers and the media, became standard throughout Western countries. • Voting reforms extended the franchise to previously uneducated element. • Every country developed a sense of national origins – the historical accuracy was less important than the motivation toward patriotism.
Wars • In the second half of the 19th century, a series of wars resulted in the creation of Italy and Germany as nation-states, significantly changing the balance of power in Europe. From 1870, Otto von Bismarck engineered a German hegemony of Europe that put France in a critical situation. It slowly rebuilt its relationships, seeking alliances with Russia and Britain to control the growing power of Germany. In this way, two opposing sides—the Triple Alliance of 1882 (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy) and the Triple Entente of 1907 (Britain, France and Russia)—formed in Europe, improving their military forces and alliances year-by-year. At the beginning of the 20th century, the First World War proved the collapse of the balance of powers.
The position of Intellectuals • Intellectuals from Kant to Rousseau, Marx to Nietzsche all presented the European unification as an ultimate political good. • Nietzsche expressed, in prophetic terms, this attitude: “what matters is the One Europe, and I see it being prepared slowly and hesitantly. We have to create a new synthesis: the European of the future. The small States of Europe-I mean all our present empires and States-will become economically untenable, within a short time, by reason of the absolute tendency of industry and commerce to become bigger and bigger, crossing national boundaries and becoming world wide”.
Political initiatives • Before the last two world wars, the dominant idea was the balance of powers between nation states. • The first world convinced everyone that this Bismarckian principle could not itself guarantee peace. • The rise of Hitler led to a rapid intensification of interest in European Federalism. • In 1939, a Constitution of the European Federation was drafted by lawyers. • Economists proposed various kinds of customs unions. The “Regime of European Federal Union”, elaborated by Briand, is based on economic principles, without omitting appropriate institutional structures and moral principles securing the “simple pact of economic solidarity”.
THE TWO CAMPS • At this time, Hitler was also presented as an advocate of a European unity. • European union has always been an idea close to the heart of European fascist movements, by promoting the principle of shared “racial affinities”. • The future generation of European rulers had divided into two alternative political camps. Those, such as Churchill and de Gaulle, who had as a basis the idea of the nation state; and the socialists, whose declared ambition, was its destruction.
The role of the USA • Having contributed to win the war, the USA wanted a say in how the new Europe should look. • Because of a desire to limit the extent, expense and duration of their involvement in establishing the new Europe, the USA became increasingly supportive of the federal agenda. • One of the conditions of the Marshall Plan was for the establishment of a “European economic federation”, which was subsequently realized in the Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC)
Europe, Germany and Strategies • In the years following the war, governing Europe was really a matter of governing Germany. • The problem was not a new military threat, but the German economic reconstruction. • The British determination of an intergovernmental approach increasingly irritated the US State department. The niceties of Sovereignty were costing millions of US dollars. Moreover, a supranational Europe could block Soviet expansion. • For the Socialists, the European idea represented much more than a way of effecting economic reconstruction. It could represent a means of moving beyond US hegemony.
The institutional structure of Europe • In the post-war years, a number of intergovernmental organizations were established, both world-wide and Europe-wide, including the IMF, GATT(WTO), NATO, the Council of Europe, and the Benelux Union. • The Benelux union, as a customs union of Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg, can be seen as a model for future European integration. • The first substantive step towards European integration was the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC).