1 / 19

Christopher J. Hand

Investigating the combined effects of word frequency and contextual predictability on eye movements during reading. Christopher J. Hand. Glasgow Language Processing. Background.

pmichelle
Download Presentation

Christopher J. Hand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Investigating the combined effects of word frequency and contextual predictability on eye movements during reading Christopher J. Hand Glasgow Language Processing

  2. Background • The ease or difficulty associated with processing a word influences when the eyes move from one fixation to another. • Two higher-level linguistic variables in particular influence eye movements (EMs) during reading • Word frequency • Contextual predictability

  3. Effects of word frequency on EMs during reading • Words can be defined as high or low frequency (HF or LF) depending on how often they occur in natural text. • LF words are fixated longer than HF words • Inhoff & Rayner, 1986; Just & Carpenter, 1980; Raney & Rayner, 1995; Rayner & Raney, 1996; Rayner & Duffy, 1986; Rayner, Sereno, & Raney, 1996; Rayner, Ashby, Pollatsek & Reichle, 2004; Rayner, Fischer & Pollatsek, 1998; Sereno & Rayner, 2000.

  4. Effects of contextual predictability on EMs during reading • Words that are more constrained by prior context (i.e., predictable) are read quicker than words that are less constrained (i.e., unpredictable). • Balota, Pollatsek & Rayner, 1985; Binder, Pollatsek & Rayner, 1999; Ehrlich & Rayner, 1981; Rayner et al., 2004; Rayner & Well, 1996.

  5. Examining the effects of word frequency and predictability simultaneously • Reaction Time Studies • Stanovich & West (1979, 1983) West & Stanovich (1982) • Typically reported an interactive pattern of frequency and predictability effects • Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study • Sereno, Brewer, & O’Donnell (2003) • Evidence to suggest an interaction between frequency and context in the early N1 ERP component (~132-192 ms post-stimulus).

  6. Examining the effects of word frequency and contextual predictability simultaneously • Few EM studies have examined the joint effects of frequency and predictability as their principal focus • A frequency × predictability interaction on EM behaviour during reading suggests that these variables affect the same stage of processing. • Word frequency affects early lexical processing • Sereno & Rayner, 2000 • Debate as to whether context affects early, lexical processing or later, post-lexical processing. • Important for models of EM control in reading.

  7. Examining the effects of word frequency and contextual predictability simultaneously • Rayner et al. (2004) • Reported no interaction on target word fixation time measures • However, Rayner et al.’s (2004) study had perceived limitations • Few experimental items per condition • Short length of pre-target context

  8. Present Study • 88 experimental items vs. 32 (Rayner et al., 2004) • 22 HF-predictable “Callum was having trouble with his homework. He asked his uncle who was a teacher to help him with the assignment.” • 22 HF-unpredictable “Ingrid’s boiler had suddenly broken down. Fortunately, her neighbour’s father was a plumber and would be able to help.” • 22 LF-predictable “Ingrid’s boiler had suddenly broken down. Fortunately, her neighbour’s father was a teacher and would be able to help.” • 22 LF-unpredictable “Callum was having trouble with his homework. He asked his uncle who was a plumber to help him with the assignment.”

  9. Present Study • Items had a maximum length of 120 characters (inc. spaces and punctuation) vs. 72 characters maximum in Rayner et al. (2004). • Argued that it is more appropriate to use longer contexts preceding target words in order for the effects of context to fully develop.

  10. Present Study • Subjects • 64 participants • Native English speakers • No serious reading disorders, i.e., dyslexia. • Method • Dual-Purkinje eye tracker (Generation 5.5) • Materials displayed over two lines of visual display (maximum line length 60 character spaces)

  11. Results • 3.6% of total experimental trials were rejected due to track losses or excessive blinking • A 2 (frequency; high, low) × 2 (context; predictable, unpredictable) analysis of variance was performed both by participants and items • A range of standard EM measures were examined • First fixation duration (FFD), single fixation duration (SFD), gaze duration (GD), total time (TT), probability of fixating the target, and spillover fixation duration.

  12. Target Word Fixation Time Data • For FFD, SFD, GD and TT, highly significant main effects of word frequency and predictability were found by both participants and items • However, no evidence of an interaction was found on these measures (all Fs < 1)

  13. Single Fixation Data • Significant 26 ms main effect of frequency • F1 (1,63) = 104, p < 0.0001; F2 (1,43) = 148, p < 0.0001. • Significant 10 ms main effect of predictability • F1 (1,63) = 13.8, p < 0.001; F2 (1,43) = 12.1, p < 0.01. • No evidence of interaction • Both Fs < 1.

  14. Discussion • An interaction between frequency and predictability effects may be an elusive effect, that does not manifest itself in the EM record. • However, research has demonstrated that the ability to extract information from words viewed parafoveally is influenced by the frequency and predictability of that parafoveal word • Inhoff & Rayner (1986) • Balota et al. (1985)

  15. Parafoveal processing • It may be the case that parafoveal preview operates in conjunction with the effects of frequency and predictability. • Parafoveal preview typically manipulated by gaze-contingent display change paradigms • Parafoveal preview benefit can also be indexed dependent on the distance of the fixation prior to fixating the target word and the beginning of the target word.

  16. Frequency × Predictability × Launch Site • Initial re-analysis of the EM data from this experiment, contingent on parafoveal preview has yielded some interesting results… • Significant three-way interaction between frequency, predictability and launch site • SFD – F1 (2,63) = 7.19, p < 0.01; F2 (2,43) = 7.49, p < 0.01 • Similar patterns for FFD, GD and TT

  17. Frequency × Predictability × Launch Site – Single Fixation Duration Launch siteFrequencyPredictabilityFreq × Pred 1-3 chars p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.05 4-6 chars p<0.0001 p=0.10 p<0.01 7-9 chars p<0.01 F<1 F<1

  18. Conclusion • The finding of an interactive pattern of effects when parafoveal preview is accounted for provides clear evidence of predictability effects at an early, lexical stage of processing. • Accurately delineating the precise time-course of the effects of contextual predictability has important consequences for models of EM control during reading and will aide resolve contention between equivocal theories of language processing.

  19. Thanks Sébastien Miellet Sara Sereno Paddy O’Donnell

More Related