1 / 12

Presenters

Working Group: Can Six Blind Men Find Apples & Oranges? Measuring Variable Implementation of QI Interventions Using Multiple Data Sources. Presenters. Alexander S. Young, MD, MSHS Elizabeth (Becky) Yano, PhD, MSPH Lisa V. Rubenstein, MD, MSPH Alison Hamilton, PhD. Overview.

pollyc
Download Presentation

Presenters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Group:Can Six Blind Men FindApples & Oranges?Measuring Variable Implementation of QI Interventions Using Multiple Data Sources

  2. Presenters • Alexander S. Young, MD, MSHS • Elizabeth (Becky) Yano, PhD, MSPH • Lisa V. Rubenstein, MD, MSPH • Alison Hamilton, PhD

  3. Overview • 90 minutes: presentations • 60 minutes: group discussion and breakout groups • 30 minutes: group consensus on priorities, suggested next steps, directions • Working group moves to plenary • 5 minute summary presented

  4. Overview of Working Group • Presentations • Introduction and overview (Alex) • QUITS smoking cessation trial (Becky) • TIDES depression collaborative care (Lisa) • EQUIP evidence-based practice in schizophrenia (Alison)

  5. Goal of Presentations • Brief orientation to example QI intervention • How context matters  sets us up for variable QI intervention deployment • Process for intentional adaptation of evidence into context of local practice • Types of data sources brought to bear on measuring implementation • including development of a fidelity score • Triangulation of data sources to tell story

  6. QI Intervention (QII) Examples • QUITS (Quality Improvement Trial for Smoking cessation) • evidence-based quality improvement to implement smoking cessation guidelines • Scott Sherman MD & Becky Yano PhD (co-PIs) • TIDES (Translating Interventions for Depression into Evidence-based Solutions) • depression collaborative care model • Lisa Rubenstein MD & Ed Chaney PhD (co-PIs)

  7. QI Intervention Examples (cont’d) • EQUIP (Enhancing QUality of care In Psychosis) • evidence-based quality improvement to implement effective treatments in schizophrenia • Alex Young MD & Amy Cohen PhD (co-PIs)

  8. TIDES Depression Collaborative Care • Evidence base: • >20 RCTs • Depression • toolkit Provider/patient education Depression care manager EBQI QI Informatics support Performance feedback “adaptation” “priority-setting” Leadership support

  9. Context Matters: Design for It • TIDES • 2:1 intervention-to-control sites x 3 VISNs (6 intervention + 3 control sites total) • VISN leaders chose sites, we randomized within network (block on network characteristics) • QUITS • regional concentration in southwest (3 VISNs) • matched on size/academic affiliation within VISN • we chose sites and randomized within network • EQUIP • 1:1 intervention-to-control sites x 4 diverse VISNs • sites chosen based on leadership interest

  10. Context Matters: Input from Sites • Attitudes / beliefs / experiences • perceived need for the intervention • competing demands • staff openness to innovation • Resources • perceived time to use program and participate in implementation • organizational structure, staffing, prior QI experience, informatics support Source: Kirchner JE, Parker LE, Yano EM, COVES evaluation (2007).

  11. Multiple Data Sources: Measuring Implementation

  12. Triangulation • Critical to collect information about implementation from multiple sources • be prepared for disagreement • perspectives and opportunities for observation differ for managers, providers vs. patients • Recognize differences between “exposed” sample and practice population • does the “enrolled” group represent the practice? • did the intervention penetrate among all providers?

More Related