1 / 23

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Analysis of Mode H and Mode L and Related Merger Proposals for AFH Date Submitted: November 1, 2001 Source: YC Maa, HK Chen, Shawn Liu and KC Chen

porter
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Analysis of Mode H and Mode L and Related Merger Proposals for AFH Date Submitted: November 1, 2001 Source:YC Maa, HK Chen, Shawn Liu and KC Chen Company: Integrated Programmable Communications, Inc. Address: Taiwan Laboratories Address: P.O. Box 24-226, Hsinchu, Taiwan 300 TEL +886 3 516 5106, FAX: +886 3 516 5108, E-Mail: {ycmaa, hkchen, shawnliu, kc}@inprocomm.com Re: [IEEE 802.15-00/367r1, IEEE 802.15-01/082r1, IEEE 802.15-01/246r1, IEEE 802.15-01/252r0, IEEE 802.15-01/366r1, IEEE 802.15-01/382r0, IEEE 802.15-01/385r0, IEEE 802.15-01/386r0, IEEE 802.15-01/491r0] Abstract: This presentation compares mode H, mode L, as well as different merging proposals for AFH mechanisms. Purpose: Submission to TG2 for analyzing mode H, L and different AFH merger proposals for draft consideration. Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. InProComm, Inc.

  2. Analysis of Mode H and Mode L and Related Merger Proposals for AFH KC Chen,YC Maa, HK Chen, and Shawn Liu Integrated Programmable Communications, Inc. InProComm, Inc.

  3. Outline • Review of AFH: Mode H and Mode L • Review of Different Merger Proposals • 01/382r0 • 01/385r0 • 01/491r0 • Conclusion InProComm, Inc.

  4. Review of AFH (1) • Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH): • Non-collaborative mechanism enabling the coexistence of 802.15.1 devices and ISM band frequency-static devices (e.g. 802.11b) • Dynamically change the frequency hopping sequence to avoid or mitigate the interference seen by 802.15.1 devices. InProComm, Inc.

  5. 1 2 3 4 Device Identification Channel Classification Classification Information exchange AFH Mechanism Review of AFH (2) • Flow of AFH • Device Identification and Operation mode • Channel Classification • Exchange of Channel Information • Initiate/Terminate AFH InProComm, Inc.

  6. Review of AFH (3): Inside AFH Mechanism RF input signal Frequency synthesizer mapping partition sequence Original hopping sequence generator Hop clock InProComm, Inc.

  7. Review of AFH (4) • AFH merger baseline document: 01/252r0 (May01) • Voted & unanimously approved in May01 meeting • initial draft text 01/366r1 in Jul01 meeting • Mode H baseline document: 01/246r0 (May01) • When the number of usable channels are sufficient (no less than the minimum required number) • Use Usable channels only • When the number of usable channels are insufficient • Use Usable and Kept channels intelligently • Mode L baseline document: 00/367r1 (Mar01) • When the number of usable channels are sufficient • Use Usable channels only • When the number of usable channels are insufficient • Use Usable and “fill-in” channels blindly • Higher packet error rate, and throughput will suffer InProComm, Inc.

  8. Review of AFH (5):Mechanism • Channels are classified into 3 groups: (dynamic classification) • Usablechannel setSU: uninterfered or good channels (size = NU) • Keptchannel setSK: interfered channels kept for AFH (size = NK) • Removedchannel setSR : interfered channels left out in AFH (size = NR) • NU + NK + NR = 79 • Define Nmin to be the minimum number of channels that a Bluetooth device must hop over. • Usable and Kept need to be considered, based on Nmin, NU: • Nmin NU: only use usable channels in the hopping sequence • Nmin> NU: require kept channels in addition to usable channels in the new hopping sequence, where kept channels NK= Nmin–NU • When kept channels are required, both “partition sequence” and “mapping” mechanisms are executed. • When kept channels are not required, only “mapping” mechanism is executed. InProComm, Inc.

  9. Review: Three Merging Proposals 01/382r0, 01/385r0, 01/491r0 InProComm, Inc.

  10. Top path: the kept & removed channels are mapped to usable channels The paths drawn in black are exactly the same structure as mode L . SU. . Mod XH 1 0 bank of usable channels 1 0 fadp 0 NU NK 1 . . . YH Middle path: the usable & removed channels are mapped to kept channels SK pseq bank of kept channels XH: shifting signal of mode H to equalize channel utilization YH: bypass control signal of mode H pseq: partition sequence specifying using SU or SK Bottom path: bypass if original channel is already in the desired set specified by pseq Review: 01/382r0 - mode H mapping fgen InProComm, Inc.

  11. Review: 01/382r0 - mode L mapping Top path: the kept & removed channels are mapped to usable channels . . . . Mod SU XL NU 0 fadp fgen bank of usable channels 1 YL fgen: hopping sequence before doing AFH fadp: hopping sequence after mapping XL: shifting signal of mode L to equalize channel utilization YL: bypass control signal of mode L Bottom path: bypass if original channel is already usable InProComm, Inc.

  12. Review - 01/382r0 Merging Proposal • Structural Comparison: • Mode H: • Path 1 - the kept & removed channels are mapped to usable channels • Path 2 - the usable & removed channels are mapped to kept channels • Path 3 - bypass • Mode L: • Path 1: the kept & removed channels are mapped to usable channels • Path 2: bypass • Mathematical Comparison: • Mode H is equivalent to Mode L when • pseq = 1, i.e. map to usable channels only. • XH=XL , same shifting signals • YH=YL , same bypass paths InProComm, Inc.

  13. Review - 01/382r0 Merging Proposal • Mode H is superset of Mode L, mode L is a special case of Mode H. • Structurally and Mathematically compared, Mode H is equivalent to Mode L when usable channels are sufficient. • Mode H • implements both modes of AFH • should be the basis for merging AFH mechanisms InProComm, Inc.

  14. Review - 01/385r0 Merge Proposal Different Naming: Frequency Replacement for Mode L Grouping/Pairing for Mode H Block Concatenation instead of functional merge 3.Use remaining ‘bad’ channels in intelligent manner. AM_ADDR CLKE12-1 / CLKN12-1 23/79 Mode 12 Selection Box Frequency Replacement Grouping / paring UAP/LAP fgen fout fadp 28 CLOCK 27 2.Remove as many ‘bad’ channels as required / legally possible. 1.Bluetooth Hopping Sequence generator InProComm, Inc.

  15. RANDW 12 . Mod NG 7 fgen Good channel bank Frequency Replacement of 01/385r0 • not_usable channels- use mapping for replacement • usable channels- bypass • The structure is identical to the mode L block diagram shown in of 01/382r0. fadp InProComm, Inc.

  16. Grouping/Pairing of 01/385r0 • 01/385r0 does not show any block diagram on Grouping/Pairing. • From the context of 01/386r0, the “grouping/pairing” block should be the same mode H block diagram as shown in 01/382r0. • Mode H already includes the “frequency replacement” functionality. InProComm, Inc.

  17. Review – Redundancy in 01/385r0 Merge Proposal • Redundant functions appear both in the first “frequency replacement” block and the second “grouping/pairing” block • Adder • Modulo • Mapping Table (bank for channels) • They should be merged wherever possible InProComm, Inc.

  18. Review - 01/385r0Merge or Concatenation? • Merge should reduce the overall complexity. • Concatenation is not a merge • It adds up the complexity • frequency replacement redundant functionality InProComm, Inc.

  19. Review - Interoperability in 01/385r0 Merge Proposal • Under 01/385r0, four different Bluetooth devices will exist • Bluetooth 1.1 legacy device • Device only using frequency replacement • Device only using grouping/pairing • Device using both of the above two schemes • Interoperability nightmares! • Deals with different vendor designs • Results in complex LMP commands and operations InProComm, Inc.

  20. Review - 01/491r0 Merged AFH Draft Traffic type (ACL or SCO) Single AFH Mechanism to accommodate mode H and mode L Partition Channel Conditions Sequence ( S , S , N , N ) Generator U K U K p ( k ) f ( k ) Legacy hop hop phase Frequency f Hop (master's clock) Re-mapper adp Kernel address Channel Conditions (master's identity) ( S , S , N , N ) U K U K InProComm, Inc.

  21. Review - 01/491r0 Merged AFH Draft • A single AFH mechanism to accommodate both mode H and mode L • Conforms to previous agreements • 01/252r0 in May01 • 01/366r1 in Jul01 meetings • Structurally similar to 01/382r0 proposal • LMP commands to be finished up as of 11/5/01 InProComm, Inc.

  22. Conclusion & Recommendation InProComm, Inc.

  23. Conclusion • AFH merger proposal (01/382r0) and AFH draft (01/491r0) • provides unified and merged framework of AFH mechanism • perfectly complies with May01 voting and Jul01 chairman’s instruction. • Mode H and Mode L have been fully implemented and incorporated in the proposal and draft. InProComm, Inc.

More Related