530 likes | 915 Views
Sample-and-Hold (S/H) Basics. ZOH vs. Track-and-Hold (T/H). Zero acquisition time Infinite bandwidth Not realistic. T/2 acquisition time Finite bandwidth Practical. A Simple T/H (Top-Plate Sampling). MOS technology is naturally suitable for implementing T/H
E N D
ZOH vs. Track-and-Hold (T/H) • Zero acquisition time • Infinite bandwidth • Not realistic • T/2 acquisition time • Finite bandwidth • Practical
A Simple T/H (Top-Plate Sampling) • MOS technology is naturally suitable for implementing T/H • The lowpass SC network determines the tracking bandwidth • Non-idealities: signal-dependent Ron, charge injection, aperture, etc.
Tracking Bandwidth (TBW) • Tracking bandwidth determines how promptly Vo can follow Vi • Typically TBW is many times greater than the max signal bandwidth • What’s wrong with the concept of “linear filtering” if Ron is constant?
Dispersion • Magnitude response • Non-uniform phase delay • Non-uniform group delay
Dispersion • Waveform is not very sensitive to the lowpass magnitude response as long as the signal bandwidth is on the order of TBW • Waveform distortion is mainly due to non-uniform phase and group delays
Signal-Dependent Ron • Signal-dependent Ron→ signal-dependent TBW → extra waveform distortion • Neither signal-dependent Ron nor dispersion is of concern if TBW is • sufficiently large (>> fin, depending on the target accuracy)
Ideal T/H • Sufficient tracking bandwidth → negligible tracking error • Well-defined sampling instant (asserted by clock rising/falling edge) • Zero track-mode and hold-mode offset errors
T/H Errors (Track Mode) • Finite tracking bandwidth → tracking error, T/H memory • Track-mode offset, gain error, and nonlinearity
Acquisition Time (tacq) Short L, thin tox, large W, large Vov, and small Vi help reduce Ron
T/H Errors (T-to-H Transition) • Pedestal error (often signal-dependent) resulted from switch turn-off • nonidealities (clock feedthrough and charge injection) • Aperture delay – the delay Δt b/t hold command and hold action • Aperture jitter – the random variation in Δt (i.e., sampling clock jitter)
Pedestal Error of Top-Plate T/H Slow turn-off: Fast turn-off: Watch out for nonlinear errors!
Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff of T/H Pedestal error: TBW: Therefore: Technology scaling improves T/H performance!
Aperture Delay (Δt) • Fixed aperture delay is usually not of problem in a single-path T/H • Non-uniform aperture delays among time-interleaved T/H paths cause significant errors (Δt1, Δt2… are also called sampling clock skew)
Aperture Jitter Ref: M. Shinagawa, Y. Akazawa, and T. Wakimoto, “Jitter analysis of high-speed sampling systems,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, issue 1, pp. 220-224, 1990.
T/H Errors (Hold Mode) • Hold-mode droop caused by off-switch/diode/gate leakage • Hold-mode input feedthrough (i.e., due to capacitive coupling)
Evaluating T/H Performance kT/C noise: T = 300K SNDR: Noise Distortion Jitter
Simple Top-Plate Sampling • Pros • Simple, minimum number of devices • Potentially wideband, zero track-mode offset • Cons • Signal-dependent tracking bandwidth • Signal-dependent charge injection and clock feedthrough • Signal-dependent aperture delay (sampling point)
Signal-Dependent Aperture Delay • Non-uniform sampling due to signal-dependent aperture delay causes distortion in top-plate S/H • Sharp clock edge and small Vin mitigate the delay variation
Signal Distortion ← 2nd-order
CMOS Switch • Ron still depends on Vin and is sensitive to N/P mismatch • Large parasitic cap due to PMOS switch for symmetric Ron • Clock rising/falling edge alignment
Clock Bootstrapping • Constant gate overdrive voltage VGS = VDD for the switch • Ron is not dependent on Vin to the first order (body effect?) • NMOS device only with less parasitic capacitance
Clock Bootstrapping Ref: A. M. Abo and P. R. Gray, “A 1.5-V, 10-bit, 14.3-MS/s CMOS pipeline ADC,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, issue 5, pp. 599-606, 1999.
Dummy Switch • Initial size of dummy chosen with the assumption of a 50/50 split of Qch; usually (W/L)dummy < ½(W/L)switch in practice • The nonlinear dependence of CI on Zi, CS, and clock rise/fall time makes it difficult to achieve a precise cancellation • Ф_ rising edge must trail Ф falling edge
Balanced Switch + Dummy • TBW • Parasitics Ref: L. A. Bienstman and H. J. De Man, “An eight-channel 8 bit microprocessor compatible NMOS D/A converter with programmable scaling,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 15, issue 6, pp. 1051-1059, 1980.
Fully-Differential T/H E.g. • All even-order distortions cancelled, including the signal-dependent aperture delay-induced distortion • Actual cancellation limited by P/N mismatch (1-10% typically)
Bottom-Plate Sampling • AC-ground switch opens slightly earlier than input switches • Signal-independent CF and CI of switch Φe to the first order! • Input switch can be further bootstrapped • Typical for applications of more than 8-bit resolution • Less tracking bandwidth due to more switches in series • Signal swing at node X is not entirely zero!
Inverting SHA • Inverting, closed-loop gain determined by the ratio CS/CH • CMOS or bootstrapped switches are required when passing signals with large swing (where?)
Inverting SHA (Track-Mode) • CF and CI are independent of Vin and cancelled differentially • Φ1e switch is equivalent to two switches of half channel length → faster, less CF and CI
Inverting SHA (Hold-Mode) • CM? • DM? • For 1X gain (CS = CH), the feedback factor is about 1/2 • Floating switch Φ2 in hold-mode → flexible input common mode • Useful for single-ended to differential conversion
Differential Mode DM half circuit • DM charge transfer is complete
Common Mode CM half circuit • CM charge is not transferred!
Flip-Around SHA • Non-inverting, 1X closed-loop gain • Close-to-unity feedback factor in hold mode • CF/CI independent of Vin and cancelled differentially