1 / 46

An Introduction to Quality Improvement

An Introduction to Quality Improvement. Kevin D. O’Brien, MD Fellow’s Research Conference July 23, 2014. Outline. Cost  Outcomes IHI, AHA and APM  Cost and  Outcomes: 2 examples: SE Alaska, Denver Health The IHI Model for Improvement A UWMC Example:  Cost and  Outcomes

portia
Download Presentation

An Introduction to Quality Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Introduction to Quality Improvement Kevin D. O’Brien, MD Fellow’s Research Conference July 23, 2014

  2. Outline • Cost  Outcomes • IHI, AHA and APM •  Cost and  Outcomes: • 2 examples: SE Alaska, Denver Health • The IHI Model for Improvement • A UWMC Example: •  Cost and  Outcomes • Overcoming Barriers • Potential Training and Resources

  3. US Healthcare is Expensive-1…

  4. US Healthcare is Expensive-2… http://www.forbes.com/sites/danmunro/2012/12/30/2012-the-year-in-healthcare-charts/

  5. …but Outcomes are Poor http://www.forbes.com/sites/danmunro/2012/12/30/2012-the-year-in-healthcare-charts/

  6. The IHI Model for Improvement, AIM-PDSA:AIM: Aim, Improvement, Measures • Aim: What are we trying to accomplish? A good aim: • Issue important to those involved • Is specific, measurable, and addresses these points: How good? By when? For whom (or what system)? • Struggling?Remember STEEP (Safe, Timely, Effective, Efficient, Equitable, and Patient-centered) 2. Measures: How will we know a change is an improvement? • Outcome Measures = Where are we ultimately trying to go? • Process Measures = Are we doing the right things to get there? • Balancing Measures = Are the changes we are making to one part of the system causing problems in other parts of the system? 3. Changes: What changes can we make that will result in improvement? • 5 ways to develop changes: Critical thinking, benchmarking, using technology, creative thinking, and change concepts. • Change concepts: Eliminate waste, improve work flow, optimize inventory, change the work environment, producer/customer interface, manage time, focus on variation, focus on error proofing, focus on the product or service.

  7. The IHI Model for Improvement, AIM-PDSA:PDSA: Plan-Do-Study-Act • Plan: Plan the test or observation, including a plan for collecting data. • Do: Try out the test on a small scale. • Study: Set aside time to analyze the data and study the results. • Act: Refine the change, based on what was learned from the test.

  8. Care Coordination and Length of Stay Initiative on the Advanced Heart Failure Service: Results and Key Success Factors to date September 26, 2013 Robb Maclellan, MD Kevin O’Brien, MD Vandna Chaudhari

  9. Organizational Alignment • Inpatient Capacity: • Reduce LOS and Optimize Care via Standardization • Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Otolaryngology/HNS • Remove Waste and Optimize the Patient’s Value Stream • Standardize Clinical Pathway Milestones and Decisions • Reduce Readmits • Improve D\C Times

  10. Table 1. Scope of the Problem: Pre-PI (July 2012 to February 2013) Measures for the UW Advanced Heart Failure Service

  11. Table 2. Key Measures: Data Sources, Methods of Calculation and Measure Types. *HPM = Horizon Performance Management system maintained by UWMC Finance and Center for Clinical Excellence (CCE) for quality measures.

  12. Key Protocols • “Idealized HF” Pathway Protocol: • Based on UCLA model • Accelerates Tx/LVAD and anticipates Early Discharge: • Tx/LVAD W/U Starts on Day of Admission • Simultaneous Medical HF Optimization • Discharge Planning Completed by Hospital Day 2 • Complete Tx/LVAD Evaluation by Hospital Day 3 • New Protocols (UW-generated) to address other LOS barriers: • IV Diuretic Protocol: • Standardized approach to aggressive diuresis • Logical target (Weight Loss, not Net I/O) • Minimize use of high-cost, low benefit meds (e.g., Nesiritide) • Evidence-based Anticoagulation: • Stopped routine anticoagulation of HF patients • Risk-based Table to assess need for heparin “bridging”

  13. Card B Length of Stay “Run” Chart -4 Days p=0.023

  14. Card B CORES Census 9/1/2010 – 12/31/2013 Daily Census and 30 Day Moving Average LOS PI Project Start Improved Access: Jul-Dec 2013 Daily Census  by 3.1 patients (93 bed days/mo)

  15. ADV HF QUALITY IMPACT

  16. Cardiology B: Advanced HF PI & service level financial IMPACT • PI savings FY 2014 YTD • 1 (Heart Transplant Therapies) + • 2 (Medical Therapies cardiac DRGs only) • $6,338,740 • Pharmacy savings ($542,000) • $5,796,740 Service-wide savings FY 2014 YTD (Heart Transplant Therapies) + (Medical Therapies, all DRGs) $7,604,474

  17. Part 1: Develop Care Pathway Part 2: Navigate the Implementation “Minefield” Pathway Development No Data/ Data as a “Hammer” Bad Team Dynamics Resistance to Change (esp. MDs) Lack of Support http://politicaldisconnect.blogspot.com/2008/07/obama-entering-dangerous-mine-field.html http://thetyee.ca/News/2013/07/11/Clark-Marathon/

  18. EXPRESSIVE AMIABLE ANALYTIC DRIVER Personality Styles and Cardiology B Extroverted Introverted Feeling • Trained to focus on identifying problems (“Barriers”) • Perfectionist Thinking Merrill and Reid

  19. Overcoming Barriers to Progress • Regularly-scheduled Card B LOS Meeting: • Agenda distributed in advance (don’t meet just to meet) • Attendance by Division Head • Developing Protocols: • Modify existing protocols from respected peer institutions • Modify 10% rather than create 100% • Many generated internally • Implement with Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzAp6ZV5ml4): • PDSA a “shop floor” version of the experimental method: • Easier to get out of Committee • Whole team involved • Team-based measure of success (Cardiology B LOS)

  20. Donald Berwick, MD, MPP, Founder, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vOxunpnIsQ Don Goldmann, President, IHI - 7 Rules for Engaging Clinicians in Quality Improvement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=831mdPYGouo&feature=player_detailpage

  21. Challenges for QI Projects • Training in basic QI methods, IHI Open School: • “Basic Quality Certificate” • Online modules, about 20+ hours • Six modules (QI 101-106) required for MHA students prior to QI project • Potential Resource: Brenda Zierler, PhD, FAAN • Mentorship: • Relative paucity of faculty mentors within Division • IHI Open School Practicum • Pair with MHA students? • Training in QI research methodology: • Potential Resources: • Tom Staiger, MD • Doug Zatzick, MD • Potential data sources: • DCDR (De-identified Clinical Data Repository) through ITHS • Potential Resource: Bob Harrington, MD (ID Division)

  22. Potential Training (IHI Open School) and Data (DCDR) Resources IHI Open School DCDR https://www.iths.org/dcdr • http://app.ihi.org/lms/mycatalogs.aspx

More Related