180 likes | 196 Views
Properties of Quarkonia at T c. Su Houng Lee In collaboration with Kenji Morita. T< 1.6 T c. 1988: Hansson, Lee, Zahed: J/ y states in QGP. 2004: Asakawa, Hatsuda: J/ y will survive up to 2 Tc. T> 1.6 T c. Confirmed by other lattice calculations: Datta etal.
E N D
Properties of Quarkonia at Tc Su Houng Lee In collaborationwith Kenji Morita
T< 1.6 Tc 1988: Hansson, Lee, Zahed: J/y states in QGP 2004: Asakawa, Hatsuda: J/y will survive up to 2 Tc T> 1.6 Tc Confirmed by other lattice calculations: Datta etal. and potential model: Wong. .. J/y in Quark Gluon Plasma 1986: Hashimoto, Miyamura,..: Mass shift of J/y Near Tc 1986: Matsui, Satz: J/y will dissolve at Tc
Large uncertainty in lattice MEM Jakovac et al. hep-lat/0611017 • Tc<T<2Tc is non perturbative region J/y T=0 phenomenological approach? High T perturbative approach? Karsch hep-lat/0106019 J/y in Quark Gluon Plasma • Tc<T<2Tc is important in HIC Kolb, Heinz, nucl-th/0305084
How can we treat heavy quark system in QCD ? Properties of QGP from lattice
Using energy momentum tensor p and e local operators <a/p B2>T =0 D<a/p G2>T <a/p E2>T Maximum at 1.1Tc Extraction from lattice: Morita, Lee (08) G2, E2 and B2 across Tc -- (quenched case) e/T4 p/T4 Lattice result for purge gauge (Boyd et al 96)
Shifman NPB73 (80) W(S-T) = 1- <a/p E2> (ST)2 +… W(S-S) = 1- <a/p B2> (SS)2+… no change change If <E2> suddently increases across Tc, what will happen to J/y immersed in it ? E2 and B2 across Tc -- (relation to potentials ?) Manousakis, Polonyi, PRL 58 (87) 847 “Nonperturbative length scale in high T QCD” Time W(S-T) aExp(-bF) L Space L W(S-S) Space
Hydrogen Atom in an external E field <E2>T <E>external
QCD 2nd order Stark Effect (Peskin, Luke, Manohar) D<a/p E2>T Attractive for ground state A non-perturbative method ?
Basics in Heavy quark system Heavy quark propagation Perturbative treatment are possible because
System with two heavy quarks Perturbative treatment are possible when
For High T > 2 Tc Separation scale For small and T close to Tc Including Temperature effects
A reliable non perturbative approach near Tc at q2 < 0 Morita, Lee: arXiv:0704.2021 (PRL 08) arXiv:0711.3998
QCD sum rules for Heavy quark system T=0 Phenomenological side OPE r J/y Y’ s predicted Mhc<MJ/y before experiment
QCD sum rules for Heavy quark system T near Tc Phenomenological side OPE r J/y D<G2>+c<G2> Y’ s D<G2> <G2> Matching Mn-1/Mn from Phen to OPE Obtain constraint for DmJ/y and G For Detail Kenji Morita’s Poster
If G=0 Dm GeV If Dm=0 GMeV |Dm|+G =15xT, near Tc Constraint for J/y Mass and Width above Tc e/T4 p/T4
From G =constraint-Dm (Stark effect) G QCD sum rule constraint with DG=0 Summary Due to the sudden change in gluon condensates, there will be a critical behavior of J/y near Tc, |Dm|+DG =150 MeV from Tc to Tc + 10 MeV • Model calculation is needed to get the changes separately, Use QCD Stark Effect ?
Summary 1. ‘Order parameter’ of QCD Phase transition: Critical behavior of J/y near Tc, mass shift and width broadening from QCD sum rules, |Dm|+DG =200 MeV from 0.98Tc to 1.05Tc with Stark effect: Dm=-100 MeV, G=100 MeV at 1.05Tc 2. A precursor phenomena takes place in nuclear matter Mass shift could be observed through anti proton project at GSI 3. Consequences in HIC?. Non trivial effects expected to cc , y’, U, U’… • Remember the many findings from Stark, Zeeman, Anomalous Zeeman effects… Challenges for future experiments and analysis !