1 / 24

Information Requirements and Tools for Screening and Preliminary Assessment

Information Requirements and Tools for Screening and Preliminary Assessment. Review: Phase 1 of the EIA process. Review: Phase 1 of the EIA process. Gathering information. to acquire an understanding of the project Screening.

posy
Download Presentation

Information Requirements and Tools for Screening and Preliminary Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Information Requirements and Tools for Screening and Preliminary Assessment

  2. Review: Phase 1 of the EIA process

  3. Review: Phase 1 of the EIA process • Gathering information. • to acquire an understanding of the project • Screening. • to determine what further steps of the EIA process will be conducted, if any. • Preliminary Assessment. • a rapid, streamlined EIA; determines if a full EIA should be undertaken • Scoping • determine boundaries of a full EIA

  4. Limited focus • Tools most applicable to phase 1 of the EIA • simpler tools • focused on impact identification, data assembly, prediction & evaluation • public participation, communication, and management techniques not discussed • more prominent in full-scale EIAs • Obviously central to community-based conservation projects

  5. Information requirements • Environmental characteristics of project site/area • climatic information • land use patterns • human resource use • habits/ecosystems present • physical and biological characteristics • status of protected areas

  6. Information requirements • Economic and social data • crops, livestock, and associated agricultural practices • local water sources & usage • local sanitation and hygiene • population size, demographics • community organization • land ownership, distribution, gender roles, other aspects of local religion, culture, and tradition that impact resource use.

  7. Information requirements • Map-based information • Topographic and physical • Maps, plans, and sketches of the proposed project or activity

  8. Data sources • Direct observation during site reconnaissance • Local population • Local consultants/counterparts • University/training centers • Reports (e.g., National Action Plan, USAID Environmental Sector Assessment) • Government statistics and ministries • GIS databases

  9. Tools for screening and preliminary assessment • checklists • matrices • overlays • networks

  10. Checklists • Bring structure to: • gathering and classifying information • identifying potential environmental impacts • thinking about possible mitigation actions • useful for making “threshhold” determinations

  11. Types of Checklists • Simple Lists • Descriptive Checklists • Scaling Checklists • Questionnaire Checklists • the USAID checklist (see PVO/NGO Guidelines...)

  12. Example of a Simple checklist Proposed Activities clearing X cut/fill X dredging X blasting - Environmental components: Physical air quality X water quality X water flow X Biological spawning habitat X rearing habitat X Socio-economic fishing X (After Sadar, 1994)

  13. Sample of a checklist SEE SAMPLE IN PARTICIPANTS’ SOURCEBOOK

  14. Checklists + & - • Advantages • can structure initial stages of assessment • help to ensure that vital factors are not neglected • are easy to apply, particularly by non-experts • Disadvantages • pose danger of “tunnel vision”

  15. Interaction Matrices • Allow for the identification of cause-effect relationships • Qualitative or quantitative estimates can be used • Can address impact severity and significance

  16. Example of an Interaction Matrix After Sadar, 1994

  17. Sample of a Leopold Matrix IN PARTICIPANTS’ SOURCEBOOK

  18. Network Analyses • Used to identify cause-effect linkages • Visual description of linkages • Extension of information found in matrices

  19. Salmonoid populations Fishing Spawning Temperature Flow Water Quality (Suspended Matter) Access Dredging Clearing Example of a Network Analysis (After Sadar, 1994)

  20. Network Analyses + & - • Advantages • Provides visual summaries that are easily understood and communicated to decision-makers and the public • Useful for identifying important indirect impacts • Disadvantages • May oversimplify relationships; can be hard to show adequate level of detail • As with above methods analysis is static • Doesn’t show relative significance of impacts

  21. Map Overlays • Separate mapping of critical environmental features at the same scale as project's site plan • e.g. wetlands, steep slopes, soils, floodplains, bedrock outcrops, wildlife habitats, vegetative communities, and cultural resources... • Older Technique: environmental features are mapped on transparent plastic in different colors • Newer Technique: Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

  22. Map Overlays + & - • Advantages • maps are commonly available • Excellent for showing spatial dimension and location of impacts • Most useful for assessing alternative routes for linear developments, e.g. pipelines, roads, transmission lines • Disadvantages • Less successful with timing, reversibility, and probability of impacts • Sharp boundary definitions can be misleading

  23. More advanced EIA tools • Cost-Benefit Analysis • Multi-Criteria Analysis • Risk Assessment • Simulation modeling

  24. Choosing tools • Criteria for choosing tools • appropriateness. • Tool can produce the needed output • economy • in general: • sophisticated and resource-intensive methods not most appropriate in practice • resource constraints on EIA are real--but are minimized by early planning and appropriate tool choice • EIA is typically <1% of capital cost

More Related