730 likes | 876 Views
Questions we’ll ask…. Do we need to specifically think about boys in our design of and implementation of behavioral support? (i.e., Are boys in trouble?) If so, what is it about boys? Then, what is a helpful response from schools?. As a Researcher:
E N D
Questions we’ll ask… • Do we need to specifically think about boys in our design of and implementation of behavioral support? (i.e., Are boys in trouble?) • If so, what is it about boys? • Then, what is a helpful response from schools?
As a Researcher: • Student researcher in Educational Psychology • Published chapters in books on PBIS and anxiety in schools • Trainer of PBIS with NCDPI for many years • The questions I will ask emerge from research and data trends
As an Educator: • Worked in regular education and special education • Worked with student behaviors from preschool to high school • The ideas I will share will be PRACTICAL, EASY TO IMPLEMENT, and CHEAP (homemade)
Questions we’ll ask… • Do we need to specifically think about boys in our design of and implementation of behavioral support? (i.e., Are boys in trouble?) • If so, what is it about boys? • Then, what is a helpful response from schools?
Do we need to specifically consider boys in our design of and implementation of behavioral support? (i.e., Are boys in trouble?)
The Tensions We Face • Discussing boys without shortchanging girls • Considering masculinity without endorsing the “gender straightjacket” • Including gender without diminishing the significance of race and economic disparities
Are boys in trouble? NC GRADUATION RATES (4-year cohort) Source: http://accrpt.ncpublicschools.org/docs/
Are boys in trouble? Students Reporting Discipline Problems as Reason for Dropping Out Source: Stearns, E. and Glennie, E. J. , 2003-08-16 "When and Why Dropouts Leave School: Lessons from North Carolina" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta Hilton Hotel, Atlanta, GA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p107973_index.html
Are boys in trouble? Rates of Office Discipline Referrals Source: Vincent, Cartledge, May, & Tobin, 2009
Are boys in trouble? Rates of Short-term Suspensions Source: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/research/discipline/reports/consolidated/2009-10/consolidated-report.pdf
Are boys in trouble? Rates of Short-term Suspensions Source: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/research/discipline/reports/consolidated/2009-10/consolidated-report.pdf
Are boys in trouble? Rates of Short-term Suspensions Source: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/research/discipline/reports/consolidated/2009-10/consolidated-report.pdf
Are boys in trouble? Rates of Long-term Suspensions Source: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/research/discipline/reports/consolidated/2009-10/consolidated-report.pdf
Are boys in trouble? NC Disabilities by Gender (%) Source: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/ec/data/childcount/reports/april1/2010/disability-gender.pdf
Are boys in trouble? NC Disabilities by Gender (%) Source: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/ec/data/childcount/reports/april1/2010/disability-gender.pdf
The Big Myth “Boys will be boys” • Deterministic (usually biologically) • Used as a paralyzing explanation • Not neutral: • Masculine threat • Apathy • Aggression
The “Boy Code” The Four Injunctions: • Sturdy oak • Give ‘em hell • Big wheel • No sissy stuff
The Sturdy Oak Characteristics: • Stability and independence • Never show weakness Problem: Affects motivation and engagement (real and perceived)
Give ‘Em Hell Characteristics: • Daring and bravado • Attraction to violence Problem: Encourages boys to be careless—about themselves and others (especially other boys)
Big Wheel Characteristics: • Pursuit of status and power • Self-worth tied up entirely in dominant achievement Problem: Success understood primarily in terms of win-lose situations
No Sissy Stuff Characteristics: • Avoidance of all things feminine • Injunction includes feelings, empathy, and dependence Problem: Aversion to femininity includes peers, teachers, activities, and content
The Gendered Curriculum: The People Percentage of Female Teachers Source: Dee, 2006http://educationnext.org/files/ednext20064_68.pdf
A Key Message of the “Boy Code” BOYS ARE SHAME- PHOBIC.
The Keys to Creating a Safe Environment for Learning R – Relate, relate, relate. I – Insist that each boy controls his destiny. S – Serve as a model for risk-taking K – Keep the momentum toward progress
R – Relate, relate, relate! Relationships between students and peers Relationships between students and teachers Relationships between students and content
Humans express belonging to a space by personalizing it (Armstrong, 1999) Use routines and, perhaps more importantly, rituals that define your community (Scully & Howell, 2009) Create a team-orientation that makes success a collaborative endeavor R – Relate, relate, relate!Building Belonging
Humans (including boys) have no choice but to follow the hierarchy of needs Cultivating a nurturing relationship with our boys is a primary responsibility, not a secondary one Learning takes place in the context of relationships, not classrooms, textbooks, or activities R – Relate, relate, relate!Being a Team-Centered Classroom
R – Relate, relate, relate!Congruent Communication Make your communication fit with respect to boys’: • Developmental needs • Cultural needs • Emotional/ • psychological state • Interests/affinities
R – Relate, relate, relate!Congruent Communication Techniques: • Student conferences • Walk-and-talk • Dialogue journals • "Perhaps more than any other form of communication, writing holds us responsible for our words and ultimately makes us more thoughtful human beings.” -- Ernest Boyer
“A smile is the shortest distance between two people.” --Victor Borge R – Relate, relate, relate!Using humor
According to research, humor helps with… Attention and motivation (Bandes, 1988; Bryant et al., 1979; Wandersee, 1982) Comprehension, particularly with boys (Gorham & Christophel, 1990) Student recall (Hill, 1988) Reducing the negative effect of testing situations (McMorris et al. 1985) R – Relate, relate, relate!Using humor
Caveats… Sarcasm Targeted Race, sex, or other off-color topics Ideas… Icebreakers/Warm-ups Mnemonic devices Use funny content (books, etc.) Jokes as reinforcers Test items In-the-moment tension reduction/redirection R – Relate, relate, relate!Using humor
I – Insist that the boy controls his own destiny Providing choice • Authentic choices • Schedule • Tasks • Topic • Mode • Type of Participation • Artful choices (intentional communication)
I – Insist that the boy controls his own destiny • Connect to and celebrate intrinsic motivation
I – Insist that the boy controls his own destiny • Connect to and celebrate intrinsic motivation • Assess what already motivates your students about school • Invite external enthusiasm into the classroom • Support boys’ activity outside of school
I – Insist that the boy controls his own destiny Become predictably exciting • Allow routines and procedures to… • Structure student participation • Support student choices • Provide cues that make the classroom “navigable”
S - Serve as a Model Risk-Taker • Learn from your students • Have students teach you extra-curricular skills • Be open to student thinking during class discussions • Ask students to defend “wrong” answers
S - Serve as a Model Risk-Taker • Allow students the opportunity to provide real, influential feedback • Suggestion boxes • Post-lesson reflections/evaluations
K – Keep the momentum in the direction of progress • Manage the potential pain of failure • Group responses • Wait Time • “Lifelines” • Cooperative work • Mastery-based assessment
K – Keep the momentum in the direction of progress • Provide relevant, meaningful feedback • Individual reinforcement systems • Classroom reinforcement systems • Racetrack • Bingo
K – Keep the momentum in the direction of progress Recognize the process • Set realistic, motivating goals • Accepting shaping