1 / 30

APPROACH TO ENERGY CONSCIOUS RETROFIT OF SLOVENIAN BUILDING STOCK Marjana ŠIJANEC ZAVRL

APPROACH TO ENERGY CONSCIOUS RETROFIT OF SLOVENIAN BUILDING STOCK Marjana ŠIJANEC ZAVRL ZRMK, Technological Building and Civil Engineering Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia. GENERAL DATA. CLIMATE: 3200 DD ENERGY USE: Industry 29%

prentice
Download Presentation

APPROACH TO ENERGY CONSCIOUS RETROFIT OF SLOVENIAN BUILDING STOCK Marjana ŠIJANEC ZAVRL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APPROACH TO ENERGY CONSCIOUS RETROFIT OF SLOVENIAN BUILDING STOCK Marjana ŠIJANEC ZAVRL ZRMK, Technological Building and Civil Engineering Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia

  2. GENERAL DATA CLIMATE: 3200 DD ENERGY USE: Industry 29% Traffic 34% Other 37% (60% in residential sector) APARTMENTS: 700.000 households 50% in single-family houses 50% in apartment buildings (90% privatized) OLD BUILDINGS: built before 1980 ENERGY DEMAND: 350 - 115 kWh/m2a AV. ENERGY USE: 180 kWh/m2a

  3. ERECTED BUILDINGS FROM 1966 - 1991 IN SLOVENIA

  4. ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL IN BUILDINGS • technical: • 60 % (windows 20 %) • economically viable: • 29 % (PB < 10 y) • low & medium cost measures • envelope at major restoration • socially acceptable • dependent on homeowner attitude and investment resources • public opinion analysis 1995/96

  5. SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL - public opinion analysis

  6. SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL

  7. …

  8. INCENTIVES FOR HOUSING SECTOR 1996, 1997 • grant subsidy scheme for low cost investment in 1996 (Ministry of Economic Affairs allocated the founds for the incentives for implementation of energy saving measures in 2800 households in Slovenia. : • loft insulation (in 355 households) - (2 EUR) 350 SIT/m2 with max. (150 EUR) 28.000 SIT/household, i.e. aprox. cost of insulation material for unused attics in average building, • window tightening (in 944 households) - (2 EUR) 400 SIT/m’ of window frame with max. (50 EUR) 10.000 SIT/household, aprox. cost of window tightening in smaller apartment, • oil burner adjustment (in 1229 households).- (30 EUR) 5.500 SIT, i.e. cost of the service.

  9. INCENTIVES FOR HOUSING SECTOR 1998 - 2002 • grant subsidy scheme for medium cost investments - implementation of EE windows and glazing in existing and new houses • anticipated rate of window exchange in households: • 21 % in 5 years …public opinion analysis • aprox. 640.000 EUR of subsidies allocated to the households • EE windows and glazing (in 2985 households) - (average subsidy 200 EUR/household; i.e. 10-15% investment or the incremental investment in energy efficient glazing, average pay back 2 - 2.5 years • savings 11600 MWh/year, CO2 reduction 2458 tons/year

  10. SUBSIDISED WINDOW TECHNOLOGY • FRAMES • U < 1.6 W/m2K • GLAZING • U < 1.4 W/m2K • OVERALL • U < 1.6 W/m2K (ISO/DIS 10077) • LOW AIR PERMEABILITY • Class C (SIST 1018)

  11. “QUALITY LABEL IN CIVIL ENGINEERING”  PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS PRODUCTION PROCESS  QUALITY OF SERVICE  INTEGRAL SUSTAINABLE CRITERIA IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

  12.  NON-OBLIGATORY CERTIFICATION LABEL  NATIONAL CHARACTER  SUPPORTING IDENTIFICATION OF EE WINDOWS  EVALUATION SCHEME  PONDERED CRITERIA  RESULTS TRANSFORMED INTO POINTS

  13. REGULATION on TI and EE of BUILDINGS • 1875 – Bauordnung – Austrian Hungarian Empire – full brick outer wall 45 cm Umax < 1.3 W/m2K • 1970 - Regulation on min. tech. requirements for thermal insulation of buildings – outer wall Umax < 1.3 W/m2K • 1980 - JUS.U.J5.600 – outer wall Umax < 0.8 W/m2K • 1984 - spec. Heat loss of building Q’ max < 7+14foW/m3(fo=A/V)recalculated in the form of EN 832: Qh < 65 + 55 fo kWh/m2aannual net heat use for space heating per unit net floor area of residential building

  14. NEW (5/2002) REGULATION IN SLOVENIA CALCULATION METHOD SIST EN 832 • Transmission and ventilation heat losses – criteria 2, 3 • Solar gains + internal heat sources > useful gains • Qh net heat use for space heating – criteron 1 CPD (89/106/EEC) ID6 Energy Economy and Heat Retention level 4+2+3 future: level 5 Directive “on energy performance of buildings” (2002/91/EC)

  15. NEW REGULATION ON THERMAL INSULATION AND EE IN BUILDINGS (SINCE MAY 2002) • 1st criterion - net heat use for space heating per net floor area • Qh < 45 + 40 fo kWh/m2a savings: (-30%) Per year: • 60.000 MWh/a less heat demand • 12.000 ton/a less CO2emissions

  16. ANNUAL HEAT DEMAND NEW -30% Figure 3. Requirements concerning maximum heat demand for space heating per net floor area Qh/Au according to the new Slovene regulation on thermal insulation and energy efficiency in buildings, (May 2002), (comparison: upper line - recent Slovenian regulations. JUS U.J5.600, middle line - Germany WSVO 95, bottom line -according to the new regulation in Slovenia)

  17. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR OVERALL ENVELOPE U VALUE (W/M2K) - 2nd CRITERION 0.33 0.66 Koper Ljubljana Jesenice 0.92

  18. Economic impact • JUS.U.J5.600 for outer wall 5cm TI oz. U=0.7 W/m2K • New regulation U=0.42 W/m2K • difference 0.28 W/m2K compensated 3cm - 4cm TI • Additional investment 20 do 35 EUR per m2 facade • For a single family house additional TI cost 200 to 500 EUR! • savings 15 kWh/m2a, pay back 3-5 let

  19. ENERGY LABELLING OF BUILDINGS • non-obligatory scheme since 2002SAVE 93/76/EEC Directive • pilot project • market priority • state subsidies • obligatory scheme2002/91/EC Directive

  20. ADR-ing, d.o.o., Ljubljana

  21. OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES TOWARDS IMPROVED EE OF SLOVENIAN BUILDINGS • concept of national program of EE rehabilitation of existing buildings (identification of energy saving potential) 1994-1996 • energy advisory network ENSVET (advisory offices in municipality, advice for homeowners) since 1992 • feasibility study for implementation of EE measures in housing - public opinion analysis on social acceptability 1995/96 • incentives for EE investments in housing (grant subsidiesscheme for loft insulation.., solar collectors, greenhouses, biomass boilers, ..EE windows… - low and medium cost investments) 1996-2002 • development of “Quality Mark in Buildings and C.E.” (“ZKG” - non-obligatory certification scheme for building products and services, i.e. EE windows) since 1997

  22. preparation of new regulation for thermal insulationand EE in buildings (EN 832) 2001/2002 • pilot project of energy certification/labelling of buildings (1999-2002) • support to development of energy auditing scheme, education of auditors, development of the auditing market, subsidies for audited buildings, EE in municipalities (since 1997)link to energy certification of public buildings 2002/91/EC Directive • revolving found for EE investments • information, awareness: workshops, training, leaflets for AURE, brochures, exhibitions in Building Centre of Slovenia • international co-operation: projects PHARE, JOULE-THERMIE, EUREKA, COST, SAVE, FP5, OPET Slovenia (since 1998)

  23. ENERGY CERTIFICATE / LABELLING OF BUILDINGS – UPGRADES NEW EE REGULATION • according to SAVE Dir. – document representing building energy indicators (heat demand indicators), ranking the building in one of seven classes according to the energy demand (A-G) • Aim – informing buyer and/or tenant of a house / apartment about the building energy indicators • connection to state subsidies for restoration of buildings

  24. EVALUATED (SUSTAINABLE) CRITERIA:  measurable technical criteria  non-measurable technical criteria  environmental criteria  efficiency and quality of production processes  satisfaction of buyers  fulfilment of the company’s business plan  global impact on the society and environment

  25. Energy labelling of appliances • obligatory since Dec. 2001 • promotion, information and awareness raising needed

More Related