1 / 44

Setup

Setup. Evolution of Mount Vessel Survey Patch Test TPU Calculation. Evolution of Mounts. Side Mount. Side Mount Patch Test. There was also a flexing of the transducer mount. Original Bow Mount Design. Mock-Up Design. NA VO Bow Mount Design. Final Bow Mount.

presley
Download Presentation

Setup

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Setup • Evolution of Mount • Vessel Survey • Patch Test • TPU Calculation

  2. Evolution of Mounts

  3. Side Mount

  4. Side Mount Patch Test There was also a flexing of the transducer mount

  5. Original Bow Mount Design

  6. Mock-Up Design

  7. NAVO Bow Mount Design

  8. Final Bow Mount Aluminum Bow Mount

  9. 60° 4 m 13.86 m 79.25° 4 m 21.07 m 1.87 m Angled Mount Theoretical Comparison Normal Mount Angled Mount (35°) *** 79.25° = 0.5 m beam separation

  10. 79.25° 4 m 0.513 m 0.490 m 0.449 m 0.469 m Swath Calculations 120° swath with 480 beams = 0.25° per beam

  11. Future Planning

  12. Angled Mount Justification

  13. 4 m 21.07 m 1.87 m 1.9 m 16.8 m Post Survey Analysis Theoretical Swath 79.25° Actual Swath

  14. Post Survey Analysis Note: Assumes full profile with traditional mount

  15. Angled Transducer Shoal Data

  16. Angled Transducer Shoal Data

  17. The Pudding The Air-Land-Sea Interface!

  18. The Pudding The 2005 Summer Survey Behold: a data gap… or two… dozen… As compared to 2008…

  19. Bow Mount – Lessons Learned • Confirm Repeatability • Does it go back to the same place? • Support needed for transit • GPS PPK antenna location • Grass accumulation • Thicker walled aluminum pipe • Welds must be contiguous

  20. Vessel Survey Determining the relative offsets of the IMU, Echosounder and Positioning Antenna…

  21. BOLTS Vessel Survey • Phase 1 – Determine the positions of the bolts

  22. Vessel Survey • Phase 1 – Determine the positions of the bolts Vertical positioning computed through digital level run… Horizontal positioning computed with total station…

  23. Vessel Survey • Phase 1 – Determine the positions of the bolts Wolfmate™ provides an interface for feeding hundreds of total station observations into Adjust software…

  24. Vessel Survey • Phase 1 – Determine the positions of the bolts • 89 Distance Obs. • 76 Angle Obs. • Only a 2D Solution Horizontal Misclosure ~ 3mm

  25. Vessel Survey • Phase 2 – Position the IMU, Sounder & Antenna

  26. } ∆≈2mm Vessel Survey • Phase 2 – Position the IMU, Sounder & Antenna

  27. Reflectors Reference Azimuth of vessel Vessel Survey • Phase 2 – Position the IMU, Sounder & Antenna Antenna IMU Multibeam

  28. PORT FWD Vessel Survey • Phase 3 – Align the Coordinate System

  29. Vessel Survey • Lessons learned • Sticker placement must be horizontal • Adjust prism constant for stickers • Level vessel • Have IMU bolted to vessel (not glued) • Use digital level • Consider using both IR and red laser • Do not use GPS for positioning bolts (AB-PE3) • Consider adding more bolts (AB-PE4?)

  30. Patch Test Target • Spare parts • Air-filled PVC • Quick & Easy • A lack of local targets

  31. Patch Test Problem Central Beam Nadir Where do you place the Target?

  32. Patch Test • Aim is to isolate and quantify misalignment errors • Placing the Target at Nadir on our mount is the equivalent of placing the Target in the outer swath of a traditional mount (Center Beam = Nadir) • Cross contamination of errors occur

  33. Modified Patch Test Timing Run 1: Speed: Y Run 2: Speed: Y x 2 Roll Run 1: Speed: Y Run 2: Speed: Y (Same speed as Run 1, in a reciprocal direction)

  34. Modified Patch Test Run 1: Speed: Y Run 2: Speed: Y Pitch Yaw Run 1: Speed: Y Run 2: Speed: Y (Same speed as Run 1, in a reciprocal direction)

  35. 2 second Timing Error With the application of PPK GPS a 1.98 second timing error is introduced The Cause remains unknown

  36. Line Running Regime

  37. TPU Calculations ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

  38. TPU Calculations • Uncertainties to be estimated… • Gyro, Heave, Roll, Pitch, Speed • Navigational Positioning (PPK) • IMU/Antenna/Sounder Offsets • Loading, Draft & Delta-Draft • Tide • Timing & IMU/Sounder Alignment

  39. TPU Calculations • Gyro, Roll, Pitch, Heave, Speed • Gyro/Roll/Pitch… 0.020 • Heave… 0.05m or 5% • Speed… 0.03 m/s

  40. TPU Calculations • Navigational Positioning (PPK) … 0.05m

  41. . 5mm ≈0 ≈3mm TPU Calculations … 0.005m • IMU/Antenna/Sounder Offsets • Determined through a combination of a network survey, vessel survey and a digital level run.

  42. TPU Calculations • Delta-Draft • Four lines run in same direction at different speeds … 0.02m • Draft • Uncertainty in draft measurement – measured with a plumb bob while hanging from the side of the vessel… … 0.03m • Loading • Vertical changes in the vessel due to fuel consumption, crew member presence, etc… … 0.03m

  43. TPU Calculations • Tide Values (measured and zoning) • Measured… • Zoning… 0.01m 0.05m

  44. TPU Calculations • Timing & IMU/Sounder Alignment • (derived through patch test data) • Timing… 0.1 sec • Gyro Align… 0.30 • Pitch/Roll Align… 0.580

More Related