1 / 33

Financing multilevel governments:A Canadian’s perspective

Financing multilevel governments:A Canadian’s perspective. by François Vaillancourt Economics department Université de Montréal. Financing multilevel governments: A Canadian’s perspective-Outline. Environment and Challenges to federations Sharing own resources Sharing central resources

presta
Download Presentation

Financing multilevel governments:A Canadian’s perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Financing multilevel governments:A Canadian’s perspective by François Vaillancourt Economics department Université de Montréal

  2. Financing multilevel governments: A Canadian’s perspective-Outline • Environment and Challenges to federations • Sharing own resources • Sharing central resources • Sharing the debt field

  3. Environment- structural/Canada • Number of entities:10 provinces ,3 territories, N aboriginal • Physical size /Distances Large: 5.5 time zones • Political size:Important difference in population 1-100 and size 1-150 between provinces • Economic size: Important différences in per capita by provinces (GDP) 1-2 • Spatial heterogeneity: Majority of francophones in Québec

  4. Challenges-structural • Climate change :Canada uneven impact linked to distribution of oil and gas resources • Demography : Canada Ageing of population: Canada uneven impact due to internal migration + international migrants • Political:CanadaSovereignty threat from Québec: latent but still potent(40-45%)

  5. Challenges-structural • Political :Centralize or decentralize too much: Canada Federal Spending Power • Economic External Globalisation:Canada NAFTA + $: uneven regional distribution • Economic:fixed resources Canada Oil and gas resources revenues :provincial royalties uneven distribution

  6. Example of Impact Matrix

  7. Challenges medium term • Who can finance: fiscal constraints • Financing to respect or modify fields of competencies/behaviour? • Canadian spending power or Eve’s apple • American multilevel transferS • Unfunded mandates • Budgetary games: trust funds,

  8. Challenges medium term fiscal

  9. Challenges: medium term fiscal-1

  10. Challenges –short term • Ideas or debates Séguin report on fiscal disequilibrium 03/02 • Politics Federal minorities(L: 06/04- 01/06+C:01/06-) • L:Set equalisation by indexed total(10/04) • L:Exclude resources for Nfld (flags!) (02/05) • C:solve fiscal disequilibrium for québec votes • Politics: Provincial strenght

  11. Responses:Canadian Challenges- No action but reports • 3/03/2006: Council of Federation report CF Reconciling the Irreconcilable Addressing Canada’s Fiscal imbalance • 6/06/2006:Federal government report FG Achieving a National Purpose Putting Equalisation back on track

  12. Sharing own resources • Two key criteria • Immobility of tax bases • Autonomy at the margin of SN So CIT =>central, PIT=> SN and VAT=> ?

  13. Sharing own resources 2 • Canadian /Swiss / USA tax autonomy is unususal • Australian/ German consensual or constitutional/legal uniformity • Scottish or Spanish timidity • Spanish use of PIT autonomy to benefit groups also observed in Canada

  14. Sharing own resources 3 • Sharing on formula basis(population) is not taxation • Sharing on derivation basis often neglects incidence(customs duties,excises,CIT) • Is public consumption occurring where taxes are paid?

  15. Sharing own resources 4 • Canada: discussion of transfer of federal VAT to provinces (drop in rate) Provinces could occupy vacated fiscal space • Australia: creation of VAT as replacement source of state grants • Spain: Catalan autonomy

  16. Sharing central resources-Issues • What government • What funding • How much funding • How to share it

  17. Sharing central resources-H or V What government:Vertical/ horizontal transfers • Horizontal :German inter Lander transfers remain the exception; • Vertical: Australia/ Canada more common

  18. Sharing central resources-H orV-2 • Sharing of profits from central organisations:Central banks in Switzerland and Tanzania • Importance of transfers to individuals from central government=>create tax base for SN

  19. Sharing central resources-H or V -3 • Note that Inter regional accounting often raised in Canada • In the past sovereignty debate; • Currently by Ontario GDP flows • Issues of borders, incidence, transfers to individuals, tax expenditures, price/quantity

  20. Sharing central resources financed by What source of funds • General revenues • Subset of one or more specific revenue And • Annual setting of amount by central G • Multi year formula

  21. Sharing central resources-financed by • Canada :All federal revenues are implicitely included: PIT,CIT,GST/VAT No natural resources royalties • Australia: VAT is source of equalisation while SPP are funded from general revenues

  22. Sharing central resources-How much • Replacement of past autonomous amounts: • Evolution issue(France TIPP)/ comparisons to past/ link to spending(social-France) • Budget balancing :disincentives on spending and revenues • Collections:in/dis-incentives to collect –depends on design • Needs :evolution issues

  23. Sharing central resources-How much-2 Canada:Equalisation • pre 2004 RTS formula five province standard(implicit exclusion of oil and gas) • Since 2004 five year agreement for equalisation with indexation of fixed amount • Canada Health+Social: Numerous changes in 1999-2004 =>Per capita +indexation • Canada Territories:Needs Barnett formula like

  24. Sharing central resources-how much-3 • Australia • VAT(GST) revenue for equalisation • Budget Balancing Assistance for abolished state taxes linked to VAT • Commonwealth decision/conditions for SPP for health and education from general revenues

  25. Sharing central resources-how much-4 • Proposals in reports CHST • CF • Maintain CHT amount and indexation 6% • Increase CST amount by 4.9 billion to correct underfunding(1994-1995 standard) and inflation and Index CST 4.5% • FG Nothing

  26. Sharing central resources-how much • Equalisation • CF Pool set using: • Ten province standard • 100% inclusion of natural resource revenues in base • Scaling factor negotiated

  27. Sharing central resources-how much • FG Pool set using • Ten province standard • 50 % inclusion of natural resource revenues in base • A cap by province:no receiving province can have a higher fiscal capacity than the poorest non receiving province

  28. Sharing central resources-shared how • Distribution between SN –General indicator • Fiscal capacity –RTS + or without • Expenditure RES • Costs (topography,.. or needs(population characteristics)

  29. Sharing central resources-shared how • Canada RTS modified • Australia RTS+RES • Proposals in reports • CF • Explicit rejection of RES:complexity and incentives • Explicit rejection of macro indicators

  30. Canadian proposals:other elements • GF makes specific recommendations on various items.We note: • No CGG type body; provide more information • CF and GF recommend use of 3-year moving average lagged 2 years

  31. Access to debt • No constraints in Australia, Canada or USA • Is Maastrich 3%/60% necessary or are there self correcting mechanisms? • Such borrowing constraints (on SNG) are common in developing countries

  32. A word on Fiscal disequilibrium • Predicted spending VS predicted revenues with Unchanged behaviour :does it make sense with fiscal autonomy? • Raise rates • Cut spending • Raid on open treasury!

  33. Conclusion • Never import institutions blindly ;each country is unique • Incentives matter and are universal • Formulas are nice but results matter

More Related