260 likes | 362 Views
Combustion Air Pre-heater Design Review Presentation. ME 486 3/13/03. Purina Boiler Efficiency Team. Members and Roles Ryan Cook Documenter and Secretary Kofi Cobbinah Team Leader and Website Manager Carl Vance Communicator and Historian Matt Bishop
E N D
Combustion Air Pre-heater Design Review Presentation ME 486 3/13/03 Carl Vance
Purina Boiler Efficiency Team Members and Roles Ryan Cook • Documenter and Secretary Kofi Cobbinah • Team Leader and Website Manager Carl Vance • Communicator and Historian Matt Bishop • Financial Officer and Mediator Carl Vance
Summary • Client Introduction • Project Description • Our Design • Mathematical Model • Schedule • Budget • Conclusion Carl Vance
Our Client – Nestlé Purina • Client contact is John Cain Manager of Engineering at the Flagstaff Plant. Purina as a company: • Flagstaff Plant opened in 1975 • Employs 180 people • Purina is now a division of Nestlé Foods Carl Vance
Purina Steam System • The boiler produces approximately 500,000 lbm of steam per day. • 40%: cooking products. • 50%: drying products. • 10%: miscellaneous areas: air and water heating systems. • Steam production is 2/3 of the plant's total energy use. Carl Vance
Project Description • Problem Definition • Nestlé Purina has requested a proposal for a combustion air pre-heater. The goal of the project is to provide savings for the plant by reducing energy costs and improving efficiency in the steam system. • Justification for the project is cost reduction and fuel conservation through higher efficiency. Carl Vance
Project Description Client’s Needs Statement: • Design of a combustion air preheater must be: • Efficient • Economically Feasible • Minimize Modifications to Existing Systems Carl Vance
Our Design Philosophy • Finish Design and Construction Under Budget. • Satisfy the Client’s Requirements. • Design for Safety. • Act with Integrity. Carl Vance
What is a Combustion Air Preheater • Device or system that heats the boiler intake air. • Uses recaptured waste heat to that would normally leave the boiler to the atmosphere. Carl Vance
Design Choice • Final Design Choice: • Concentric Duct Design • Air enters into a duct that surrounds the stack. • The stack transfers heat to the air by convection and radiation. • The air enters into the boiler at a higher temperature. Ryan Cook
Preheater Design Basics Ryan Cook
Design Benefits • Concentric Duct Design Will Provide: • Relatively Low Installation Cost • Low Material Costs • Low Impact on Existing Systems • High Payback on Investment • Low Maintenance Costs Ryan Cook
Specifications to date • The stack height is 4.3 meters, which fixes our duct height and will provide our surface area for heat transfer. • Duct diameter will be 1.15 meters to optimize forced convection. Ryan Cook
Proposed Design Ryan Cook
Project Monetary Savings Convection Savings Forced Convection Radiation
Accomplishments to Date • Proposal Document has been accepted by client • Mathematical Analysis of the design has been accepted by the client. Kofi Cobbinah
Problems Encountered • CAD model is taking more time than estimated. Kofi Cobbinah
Future Design Tasks • Final Design will include: • Finalizing Mathematical Models • Finishing CAD Models • Design Results • Bill of Materials • Construction Methods Kofi Cobbinah
Project Schedule CAD Models ------------- March 24, 2003Final Design-------------- April 20, 2003Capstone Presentation- April 25, 2003Final Report ------------- May 2, 2003 Kofi Cobbinah
Budget • Printing Cost • Proposal Document ----------------- $15 • Mathematical Models Document - $15 • Total--------------------------------------- $30 Kofi Cobbinah
Team Time Log Kofi Cobbinah
Conclusion • We are on schedule to finish all deliverables and have a completed design as planned. • We will provide the client with a design that is both efficient and feasible to implement. Kofi Cobbinah
Questions? Kofi Cobbinah