1 / 17

Institutional Revie w Board (IRB) MCLA

Institutional Revie w Board (IRB) MCLA. Ann Billetz, Ph.D. 11/6/09. A safeguard to promote the ethical and responsible treatment of participants in research. Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB policy. History. Nazi Medical War Crimes (1939-1945)

preston
Download Presentation

Institutional Revie w Board (IRB) MCLA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional Review Board (IRB)MCLA Ann Billetz, Ph.D. 11/6/09

  2. A safeguard to promote the ethical and responsible treatment of participants in research • Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB policy

  3. History • Nazi Medical War Crimes (1939-1945) • Nuremberg Code – First International code of research ethics www.nvic.org

  4. History www.uveitis.org • Syphilis Study at Tuskegee (1930’s-1972) • Development of an advisory panel by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare • National Research Act of 1974 • HHS Policy for Protection of Human Subjects • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research

  5. Belmont Report • Three principles essential to the ethical conduct of research with humans: • Respect for persons • Beneficence • Justice Excerpt from nihtraining.com

  6. Respect for Persons • Informed Consent - Make sure that potential participants comprehend the risks and potential benefits of participating in research. • Avoid influencing potential participants’ decisions either through coercion or excessive compensation. Excerpt from nihtraining.com

  7. Respect for Persons • Persons requiring additional protections. • Children • Developmental disabled • Pregnant women • Fetuses & neonates • Prisoners Excerpt from www.nihtraining.com

  8. Beneficence • Do no harm • Maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harm Excerpt from www.nihtraining.com

  9. Justice • Requires that individuals and groups be treated fairly and equitably in terms of bearing the burdens and receiving the benefits of research. Excerpt from www.nihtraining.com

  10. How does this pertain to me?

  11. Am I sure that any participant I might have in my research project can read and fully understand my informed consent materials for the study? • To what extent do my research materials solicit personally identifying features of participants so that there is a risk of them being known only through their research materials? • If data were accidentally lost or made public, what risk of embarrassment or loss of privacy would a participant face?

  12. Have I checked with others to ascertain if items in my research materials might be perceived as embarrassing, culturally offensive, or overly-invasive to participants? • If I collect data on sensitive topics (e.g., sexual abuse), include protected populations (e.g., minors), or become aware of a participant's potential harm to self or others (e.g., intent to commit suicide), do I know my obligations to act (if any) under institutional policies and state laws concerning the protection of minors or mentally ill persons?

  13. If a participant starts to experience discomfort because of some of the questions on my instruments, have I made arrangements and appropriate referral services available to the person if the discomfort continues or is severe? • Can I make myself readily available to all participants during my research via an array of contact avenues (e.g., phone, fax, e-mail, fixed mailing address)?

  14. Can I safely store my data in a locked location away from any eyes except those qualified co-investigators approved by IRB? • Can I make sure that incentives (e.g., extra credit, money, other valuables) are evenly and equitably available to all participants, and that any incentive I use does not unduly entice a disadvantaged group or protected population to accept an unreasonable risk in participating in order to gain the incentive? • Excerpt from Prieto L (2005) The IRB and Psychological Research: A Primer for Students. Eye on Psi Chi.

  15. The IRB and YOU • All proposed research involving human participants must be reviewed and approved by the IRB before any research can be started.

  16. The IRB defines human subjects as living individuals about whom an investigator, student or faculty, conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information, who volunteer to participate in research. • Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB Policy

  17. http://www.mcla.edu/Academics/institutionalreviewboard • January start date!

More Related