1 / 9

Tax Reform

Tax Reform . Martin Feldstein Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research. The Tax Structure Has Become Much Better. Reduced individual marginal tax rates Top rate down from: 91% in 1960, 70% in 1980 Reduced corporate tax rate Rate down from 52% in 1960, 46% in 1980

preston
Download Presentation

Tax Reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tax Reform Martin Feldstein Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research

  2. The Tax Structure Has Become Much Better • Reduced individual marginal tax rates • Top rate down from: 91% in 1960, 70% in 1980 • Reduced corporate tax rate • Rate down from 52% in 1960, 46% in 1980 • Fewer tax deductions and exclusions • Major changes in Tax Reform Act of 1986 • Lower tax on dividends and capital gains

  3. Favorable Effects of Previous Personal Tax Reforms • Lower tax rates improve: • Work incentive • Form of compensation • Saving incentive • Lower tax on corporate income, dividends and capital gains improve: • Saving incentive • Form of investment (corporate vs other) and finance (bias against dividends and in favor of debt finance)

  4. Priorities for the Future • Reduce marginal tax rates that distort individual incentives • Reduce corporate income tax distortions that now • Reduce saving by lowering net return • Reduce dividend payout because of double taxation • Increase corporate use of debt finance

  5. “Fundamental Reforms” Would Achieve These Goals • Value added tax (or national sales tax), Flat tax, Consumed Income tax • BUT • Distributional problems eliminate pure VAT and pure Flat Tax • VAT and Consumed Income Tax involve major transition problems

  6. Two Possible Piecemeal Reforms Could Also Achieve Those Goals • Tax husbands and wives separately • Integrate corporate and personal income tax rates

  7. Taxing Husbands and Wives Separately • Lowers marginal rate on 2nd earners • Common practice in most other countries • Can be done in revenue neutral way • Can be applied to wage and salary income only or to all income

  8. Integrate Corporate and Personal Income Taxes • “Gross-up and credit” method has been widely used in other countries • Total earnings imputed to individual taxpayers • Corporate tax regarded as withholding at source • Individual receives tax refund if personal rate less than “credit rate” • Credit rate is 35% with complete integration but could be less to achieve revenue neutrality • Could be combined with other corporate tax reforms, e.g., investment expensing

  9. Favorable Effects of CIT Integration • Lowers tax rate on equity investment and saving • Reduces anti-dividend bias in current law • Reduces current bias in favor of debt finance

More Related