1 / 14

Developing Firm-Specific Competitive Advantage: The Globalization of Markets

Developing Firm-Specific Competitive Advantage: The Globalization of Markets. 15.220 Lecture #7 Eleanor Westney. Hart-Milstein Typology of Markets. Consumer Economy Emerging Economy Survival Economy Strategies:

pricedoris
Download Presentation

Developing Firm-Specific Competitive Advantage: The Globalization of Markets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing Firm-Specific Competitive Advantage: The Globalization of Markets 15.220 Lecture #7 Eleanor Westney

  2. Hart-Milstein Typology of Markets • Consumer Economy • Emerging Economy • Survival Economy Strategies: • Identify a market segment within each type of economy that has the same needs and wants; OR • Segment markets in each type of economy OR • Exploit the differences across the economies to build competitive advantage that is relevant,appropriable, and transferrableacross the three categories

  3. Key Indicators of Globalization in an Industry • Market: • in each market, rising sales of products that are not produced locally • growing similarity of customer needs and tastes, either in general or in particular segments • growing importance of multinational customers

  4. Key Indicators of Globalization in an Industry (cont’d) • Value Chain: • increasing pressures for lower costs and greater efficiency/scale economies • falling impediments to cross-border trade (government regulation, costs of transport, etc.) • growing standardization of components/inputs (e.g. quality standards) • increasing similarity of structures and processes of distribution and marketing

  5. Key Indicators of Globalization in an Industry (cont’d) • Technology: • rising costs of technology development • growing diversity in location of “hot spots” – centers of excellence in technology development

  6. Key Indicators of Globalization in an Industry (cont’d) • Competition/Complementers: • industry dominated by same set of competitors in every major market • same companies providing complementary assets in every major location

  7. What’s Different about Emerging Economy Markets? • Timing of entry: first-mover advantages • Market assessment: grow with the market • Product policy/positioning • Partner policy

  8. Roles in the Transnational Model H Black Hole Strategic Leader Strategic Importance of the Environment Implementer Contributor L L H Level of capabilities in local unit Diagram: Bartlett, Christopher, and Sumantra Ghoshal. Chapter 7 in Gupta and Westney. "Smart Globalization: Designing Global Strategies, Creating Global Networks."

  9. Global/Local Roles Basic Research Need for cross-border integration, coordination Product Development Rroduction Marketing Sales & service Need for local responsiveness

  10. Global/Local Roles Core component production Basic Research Locally sourced components Assembly Need for cross-border integration, coordination Product Development Production Product Policy Marketing Advertising Sales & service Pricing Distribution Promotions Need for local responsiveness

  11. Acer’s Sales Distribution by Geography 2001 EMEA Greater China Americas Asia-Pacific

  12. Acer Organization Design • Does not rely on ownership • JVs in key components, TI/Acer DRAMs • Distribution companies are free-standing, ACER has local partners in JV structure • No corporate HQ charges • Arms length pricing • Local autonomy re product mix, sourcing • Control through brand name, key components, $$$

  13. Acer Aspire: Concluding Observations • Acer tried to build separate organization for marketing/local responsiveness (RBUs) and for production/efficiency (SBUs), and have knowledge networks follow a “pull system” on an “as needed” basis (like its production system) • Problems: RBUs knew the market but didn’t know how to access needed knowledge in SBUs, didn’t have power to get it once they knew what they needed • Case illustrates the difficulty of building cross-border networks and need for time and resources to build them

  14. Positioning for Emerging Market Companies High Forces for Globalisation of Industry Low Business model leverageable in other markets Location- Bound Competitive Advantage

More Related