1 / 17

Recent development for lowenergy package

Recent development for lowenergy package. V.Ivanchenko Budker Institute for Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia. Main activity in 2002. Electron ionisation Electrom Bremssrahlung Hadron ionization GenericIons ionisation Interface to deexcitation module Fluctuations.

prince
Download Presentation

Recent development for lowenergy package

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent development for lowenergy package V.Ivanchenko Budker Institute for Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia

  2. Main activity in 2002 • Electron ionisation • Electrom Bremssrahlung • Hadron ionization • GenericIons ionisation • Interface to deexcitation module • Fluctuations V.Ivanchenko

  3. Electron energy loss in G4 lowenergy package • Is based on EEDL database data on cross sections and spectra • In G4 3.2 there were serious problems in electron processes • Redesign electron physics is available from 4.0, 4.1-ref-02 – fix main problems • Parameterization of 7650 atomic shells V.Ivanchenko

  4. Electron bremsstrahlung in G4 4.0 F(x) parametrised from EEDL. At high energies: Continuous energy loss Direction of the outgoing electron thesame as that of the incoming one; angular distribution of emitted photons generated according to a simplified formula based on the Tsai cross section (expected to become isotropic in the low-E limit) Gamma ray production V.Ivanchenko

  5. Electron ionisation in G4 4.0 Bs is the binding energy of sub-shell s Continuous energy loss Value of coefficient A for each element is obtained from fit to EEDL data for energies available in the database d-electron production V.Ivanchenko

  6. Problems of G4 4.0 parameterization • 50% of level spectra for ionization had problems • For part of atoms dE/dx was not fit standard results at 1-10 MeV energy region • Bremsstrahlung spectra at max energies do not fit standard V.Ivanchenko

  7. Solutions for G4 4.1 • For both processes for each shell and atom energy scale for secondary is subdivided on 2 parts – one the same as G4 4.0, in second value A is parameterized • Results of comparison EEDL data and ionization parameterization: • 3034 shells are inside 1 % • 4448 shells are inside 10 % • 168 shells are outside 10 % • Average RMS 2.2 % (17 % in G4 4.0) V.Ivanchenko

  8. Comparison with SANDIA electron data • Ionisation profile in media from 1MeV electron strongly depends on multiple scattering • LowEnergy package has small advantage to standard for small step sizes V.Ivanchenko

  9. Delta-electron production Si Be V.Ivanchenko

  10. Delta-electron production Fe Pb V.Ivanchenko

  11. Bremsstahlung Si Be V.Ivanchenko

  12. Bremsstahlung Fe Pb V.Ivanchenko

  13. Current problems • Angular spectrum of Bremsstrahlung for low energies • 168 non perfect shells • 1 – 10 MeV energy range for some elements has problems • Range artifact V.Ivanchenko

  14. Hadron ionisation V.Ivanchenko

  15. Hadron ionisation • For the proton energy range 1-2 MeV are not perfect for some atoms for all available models • SRIM-2000 parameterization are welcome V.Ivanchenko

  16. Ion ionisation • Ionisation for GenericIons in G4 4.1 • Bragg peak position and right side are perfect • Left side is not so precise V.Ivanchenko

  17. Conclusions and plans • List of problems to be fixed to G4 5.0: • Range artifact • Fluo artifact • Range of heavy ions • Angular distribution for Bremsstrahlung can be improved • SRIM-2000 for hadrons and ions? • Model approach will improve quality V.Ivanchenko

More Related