Best Practices for Information Security Governance Risk and Compliance

1. Best Practices for Information Security Governance Risk and Compliance Information systems represent more than 20% of a company's annual budget. Thus, they must be adapted to the context of each company and its business objectives. The current technological context and the growth of security risks encourage organizations to adopt a structured, adapted, and responsible security program. Information security governance risk and compliance refer to the means of managing information security as well as the means of regulating the security systems put in place in a company to achieve its objectives. As such, security governance is a continuous process that is an integral part of a company's culture, integrating risk management and strategically aligned with its business objectives. It

2. sets tactical and operational security rules, such as the implementation of appropriate controls. Therefore, it ensures information governance compliance with applicable standards and consistency in the implementation of the normative framework. Whether you are subject to NIST 800-53, ISO 27000, or PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard), many companies must comply with specific requirements and adopt cybersecurity best practices. Developing policies, guidelines, and procedures are the starting point of the governance framework and establishing an overall security program to ensure the application of security principles, measures, and controls within your company. INFORMATION GOVERNANCE AND COMPLIANCE An effective governance framework requires that a security program be defined globally and over the long term, based on crucial information security elements. These aspects must be assessed, understood, and integrated. The information governance and compliance framework include the organizational structure, the development of the normative framework, the risk management tools as well as the security architecture. NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK The development of the normative framework is a crucial step in the establishment of a governance framework. In fact, an organization's

3. internal policies, directives, and procedures are the reference tools on which stakeholders rely to exercise their designated roles and responsibilities. Employees are the main actors in the process of implementing the framework, so they must understand the nuances and comply with them. Our information governance policy writing specialists rely on the best information security standards, such as ISO/IEC 27001 and 27002. In addition, we ensure that the definition of our clients' normative framework complies with the normative aspects of information technology law and the protection of personal and confidential information, according to the particularities and legal requirements applicable to organizations. AUDITS AND ASSESSMENTS Organizations do not all have the same level of information security maturity and they are at various stages in the process of understanding their security posture, exposing and mitigating risk, and remediation. Thus and in many cases, activities before the development of the governance framework must be carried out to better understand the position of our clients and to target the objectives. Indeed, security “health checks” can be carried out, as well as audits or intrusion tests. Each preliminary activity aims to give us the facts and adjust the security program according to the needs, business objectives, and inherent challenges of the organization. RISK MANAGEMENT

4. Proteus's approach to risk management is based on the method of key controls and security architecture, a proven methodology that allows a quick reading of the company's posture by taking into account a set of essential controls in an information security environment. Although traditional analysis methods exist, they are very complex, costly, and subjective and the results are not always conclusive. Taken from a security standard (eg ISO 27002, ISO 27033, NIST, ISF, or other) a key security control is a control that generally has a significant influence on the risk posture. Once the benchmark has been identified and selected, the analysis determines a reduced number of key controls, chosen according to their maximum impact on risk and it is from this limited "reference" that it is possible to measure the maturity. of these key controls according to a maturity scale similar to Cobit4. This simplifies risk posture assessment, enhancement, and periodic monitoring. SECURITY ARCHITECTURE OF INFORMATION SECURITY GOVERNANCE RISK AND COMPLIANCE The implementation of security architecture (OSA) is part of the approach to controls method, and makes it possible to optimize the development and maintenance of the maturity of keys and additional controls, in particular, by the implementation of business services and design patterns. Thus, like a marquee where the entire structure rises when the canvas is hoisted to the height of the main pillars, raising the maturity of key controls leads to raise additional controls.

5. The security architecture is defined and then implemented step by step to meet the needs of the normative framework and risk management. Source Url : https://proteusdiscover.livejournal.com/930.html