1 / 10

Scientific Systematic Review writing services – Pubrica

A systematic review is designed to summarise the results of available studies and provides a high level of evidence-based findings on the effectiveness of interventions. <br>For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/<br>

pubrica
Download Presentation

Scientific Systematic Review writing services – Pubrica

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COPYRIGHT©2021PUBRICA.ALLRIGHTSRESERVED Systematic Review Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing &Peer-Reviewing

  2. SystematicReview A systematic review is designed to summarise the results of available studies and provides a high level of evidence-based findings on the effectiveness of interventions. Our experts can handle any type of research, whether you need systematic review based on controlled clinical trials or review based on observational study designs or community (e.g. psychology) intervention? Our experts at Pubrica, perform a rigorous systematic review by following multi-step process, which includes Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  3. Identifying a well-focused clinically relevant research question while following suitable frameworks including PICO, SPICE, SPIDER, and ECLIPSEetc. Developing a detailed review protocol with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and registering the protocol at different registries such as The Campbell Collaboration, The Cochrane Collaboration, OSF Preregistration, SYREAF-systematic reviews for animals and food, Research Registry, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) andPROSPERO. Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  4. A systematic literature search of multiple databases (includes PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) in finding relevant references that further requires extensive search andstudy. A number of other electronic databases and bibliographic sources will also be searched. Sources we posit for use for the projectinclude: Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  5. Scientific literature databases as described above andothers CochraneLibrary Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) NHS Economic Evaluationdatabase Material referenced in Publications obtained in the course of research on thetopi Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  6. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA)documents Clinical trials databases, including clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EU), clinicaltrials.gov (US) andothers. Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  7. However, using multiple databases to search relevant studies is laborious and time-consuming so that a well-designed search strategy will be developed. Meticulous study identification using a variety of search terms, checking for a clear outcome (primary andsecondary) Systematic data abstraction, by at least two sets of investigators independently, Risk of bias assessment with the use of existing different assessment tools (e.g. STROBE). For example, allocation concealment (selection bias), incomplete outcome data addressed (attrition bias), and selective reporting (reportingbias). Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  8. Thoughtful quantitative synthesis through meta-analysis where relevant. Besides informing guidelines, credible systematic reviews and quality of evidence assessment can help identify key knowledge gaps for future studies. We can help you with the most used qualitative systematic review, as well as, quantitative, health policy and management information and meta-analysis. Our systematic review at Pubricais more structured as at every stage of writing, and we ensure to critically check the rigour using standard methodological checklists such as PRISMA, CASP, AMSTAR, and ARIF etc., based on the checklistprovided. Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  9. FURTHER,THE GENERAL STRUCTURE IS PRESENTED ASFOLLOWS: Formulate the research question Search forstudies Selection of studies Datacollection Methodological quality assessment Methods used for presenting results Findings areinterpreted. The time required for producing a quality systematicreview Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

  10. Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rightsreserved ContactUs Work WithUs UK: +441618186353 INDIA:+91-9884350006 sales@pubrica.com Freelancer Consultant Guest BlogEditor ( hr@workfoster.com) Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

More Related