1 / 16

Driving while conversing Cell phones that distract and passengers who react 報告者：楊子群

Dri ving B ehavior S imulation Lab. Driving while conversing Cell phones that distract and passengers who react 報告者：楊子群.

qamar
Download Presentation

Driving while conversing Cell phones that distract and passengers who react 報告者：楊子群

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab Driving while conversing Cell phones that distract and passengers who react 報告者：楊子群 Traffic & Road Safety Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New ZealandTransport Engineering Research New Zealand Ltd., PO Box 97846, South Auckland Mail Centre, New Zealand

  2. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab • Sample : 119 participant. • Remove 7 participant. • Mechanical failures(5) • Eyestrain or dizziness(2) • Of the 64 participants.(the other 48 served as conversors for the drivers) • 87% indicated they owned a cell phone. • Converse as they drove :78.6% • (51.8% used it weekly or more often) • Cell phone to send and receive text messages while they drove:66.1% • (51.8% used it weekly or more often) Experiment 1 Participants

  3. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab • Complete automobile.(BMW 314i) • Three angled projection surface. • Four speaker located inside the car. • A digital video camera. Experiment 1 Apparatus

  4. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab 5 Hazard 1 overtaking lane Experiment 1 Simulation scenario

  5. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab • Between subjects. • Independent Variable • 4 Group(16 Participants, 50% male) • Randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups. • Dependent Variable • Mean seed • Mean deceleration RT(sec) • Mean deceleration TTC(sec) • Mean utterance length • Mean number of pauses • Mean % SA utterances • Mean % hazards recalled • Driving Difficulty • Total number of crashes • Percent of drivers Experiment 1 1.Control 2.Passenger 3.Cell phone 4.Remote passenger Experiment design

  6. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab • [Step1] Introduction • [Step2]Consent agreement • [Step3] Brief questionnaire about background and cell phone use. • [Step4] Short practice. • [Step5] Participants in Groups 2 to 4 then self-selected which the pair. • Can any topics,conversation card be used of no topics. • [Step6] experiment(24min) • [Step7] asked to rate the difficulty of driving the simulated on a 7-point scale • 1=easy 7=extremely Experiment 1 Procedure

  7. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Vehicle speeds(1/3) Experiment 1 Results Significant difference

  8. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Vehicle speeds(2/3) Unuivariate analyses at each hazard site showed significant group differences: Hazard 1(busy intersection) Hazard 3(one-lane bridge) Hazard 4(road works) Hazard 5(landslip) Experiment 1 Results

  9. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Vehicle speeds(3/3) Experiment 1 Results

  10. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Reaction time and time-to-collision(1/3) Mean deceleration RT Mean deceleration TTC Experiment 1 Results

  11. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Reaction time and time-to-collision(2/3) One-way multivariate analysis id variance for four group. Four remaining hazard sites(Hazards2-5) indicated a significant effect. (p<0.01) Univariate analyses of the two deceleration measures significant differences: Hazards3 Hazards4 Hazards5 Experiment 1 Results

  12. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab 3 2 1 Significantly Significantly -Reaction time and time-to- collision(3/3) Experiment 1 A A A A Good=>short No Significantly B B B B B B Results A>B A>B Significantly A A A A Good=>long B B B B B B A>B A>B A>B

  13. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Discourse measures愛 Experiment 1 Post hoc comparisons Significantly A A A A Results C C A B B B B B A>B A > B > C

  14. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab Post hoc comparisons Significantly -Difficulty ratings, hazard recall, and crashes Post hoc comparisons Significantly A Experiment 1 A B No Significantly B A>B Results Most memorable hazard for the participants was the landslip. Perhaps this was the last to appear. A>B

  15. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Difficulty ratings, hazard recall, and crashes occurring at Hazard 3(one-lane bridge) – 61.9% Hazard 2(parked car entering traffic)-33.3% Experiment 1 Chi-square analysis . Significant difference between the four groups. B A>B A Results

  16. Driving Behavior Simulation Lab -Overtaking No significant differences in speeds measured at four point. (control、passenger、cell phone、Remote passenger) Optimal number that could be safely overtaken was two vehicles. Experiment 1 Results 68.8% 50% Chi-square analysis . Marginally Significant difference

More Related