320 likes | 487 Views
The Equity Risk Premium and other things. Craig Ansley. November 2009. Outline. What is the ERP? Historical values Estimation The ERP puzzle Failure of financial theory A new model for investment returns A solution to the ERP puzzle Solutions to other puzzles in finance
E N D
The Equity Risk Premiumand other things Craig Ansley November 2009
Outline • What is the ERP? • Historical values • Estimation • The ERP puzzle • Failure of financial theory • A new model for investment returns • A solution to the ERP puzzle • Solutions to other puzzles in finance • Implications for investment strategy
What is the Equity Risk Premium? • Based on index returns • Commonly long-term government bonds B. Cornell “The Equity Risk Premium” 1999
Historical ERP Typical forecasts around 4%
Outline • What is the ERP? • Historical values • Estimation • The ERP puzzle • Failure of financial theory • A new model for investment returns • A solution to the ERP puzzle • Solutions to other puzzles in finance • Implications for investment strategy
Utility and Risk Aversion More risk-averse Less risk-averse
Consumption Asset-Pricing ModelLucas 1978 Maximise utility:
The Equity Premium PuzzleMehra & Prescott 1985 Asset risk premium Sharpe ratio = σ(Asset return) = γx σ(Δc) x ρ(Δc) = 4 x 0.01 x 0.2 = 0.008 If equity volatility is 15%, then ERP should be 0.008 x .15 = 0.12% Observed ERP not explained by economic theory
Outline • What is the ERP? • Historical values • Estimation • The ERP puzzle • Failure of financial theory • A new model for investment returns • A solution to the ERP puzzle • Solutions to other puzzles in finance • Implications for investment strategy
Output At evolves as random walk + drift iid N(0,σ2) Drift Disaster model for economic outputBarro 2005 Disaster model vt = 0 large probability = large loss small probability
What’s a disaster? • Natural disaster • Credit crisis • Wars • Bubbles • Agricultural disaster
Calibrating the model--GDP Probability of disaster = 1.7% Source: Barro, NBER 2005 Based on 60 economic disasters in 35 countries 1900-2000
A new model for asset returnsRiesz (1988), Barro 2005 Return over a given period = Expected return + Normal deviation + Disaster return Disaster return = 0 large probability = large loss small probability Predicted ERP close to historical values
Time varying probability of disasterGabaix 2008 If the probability of disaster varies over time, several puzzles in finance are explained: • Equity premium puzzle • Excess volatility puzzle • Value-growth puzzle • Corporate bond spread puzzle • Correlations between asset classes close to 1 in bad times • High price of out-of-the money puts • Uncovered interest parity puzzle
Equity premium puzzle • Economic theory predicts ERP of 0.1%(Mehra & Prescott, 1985) • Average ERP since 1880 has been 7% • ERP predicted by Barro’s model 7.1%
Uncovered interest parity puzzle • Country A has interest rate 3%Country B has interest rate 1%Country A’s currency should depreciate by 2% • But FX rates of high interest rate countries do not trend down! • Carry traders subject to crash risk (Brunnermeier, Nagel & Pedersen, 2008) • Disaster model predictions:For countries with high disaster probabilities • High interest rates • Appreciating currencies • Currency crash risk (Farhi & Gabaix, 2009)
High ERP is here to stay Disaster model • Explicit allowance for unusually bad events • Explains many problems with conventional theory • Can be calibrated from historical data
Outline • What is the ERP? • Historical values • Estimation • The ERP puzzle • Failure of financial theory • A new model for investment returns • A solution to the ERP puzzle • Solutions to other puzzles in finance • Implications for investment strategy
A simple example • Target fund $100 in T years • Contributions Ct at t = 0,1,…,20 • Ct set each year by valuing at rate i
Assumptionsfrom Barro (2005) with Barro’s disaster model
Dynamic Asset Allocation • Conventional: constant asset allocation • Alternative: change in response to performance • Dynamic programming problem e.g. Dempster et. al., British Actuarial Journal, 2002
Dynamic Asset AllocationQuartiles of simulated strategies γ = 3, i = 4.0%, d = 4.5% Optimal constant strategy 29% equities
DAA is worth an increase of 1.2% in returns Advantage of Dynamic Asset Allocation • Optimal penalty with constant strategy 641.7 • Optimal penalty with DAA 494.7 • If all returns raised by 1.2%, optimal constant strategy penalty drops to 494.7
Conclusions • Standard model can’t explain ERP (or other things) • Disaster model solves many puzzles in finance • Historical disaster experience consistent with ERP • Disaster model requires lower equity allocations • DAA outperforms conventional approach