240 likes | 331 Views
Gravitino Dark Matter in R-violating SUSY. M. Lola MEXT-CT-2004-014297. Work with N.E.Bomark, P.Osland and A.Raklev. Content. Dark Matter: Is observable R-violation compatible with SUSY DM? Gravitino decays in R-violating SUSY Couplings & Flavour Effects
E N D
Gravitino Dark Matter in R-violating SUSY M. Lola MEXT-CT-2004-014297 Work with N.E.Bomark, P.Osland and A.Raklev
Content Dark Matter: Is observable R-violation compatible with SUSY DM? Gravitino decays in R-violating SUSY Couplings & Flavour Effects Link to Lepton flavour violation: R-violation versus MSSM Conclusions
Motivation for R-violating supersymmetry In addition to couplings generating fermion masses, also - These violate lepton and baryon number - If simultaneously present, unacceptable p decay
Ways out: X Either kill all couplings via R-parity (SM: +1 , SUSY: -1) LSP: stable, dark matter candidate Colliders: Missing energy • Or allow subsets by baryon / lepton parities LSP: unstable – lose (?) a dark matter candidate Colliders: Multi-lepton/jet events
Gravitino DM in R-violating supersymmetry? • If LSP a gravitino, its decays very suppressed by Mp • The lighter the gravitino, the longer the lifetime Questions:can gravitinos be DM even with broken R-parity? Can we hope for BOTH DM AND R-violation in colliders? Answer:depends on how gravitinos decay under R-violation
3-body trilinear R-violating decays Chemtob, Moreau Suppressed by: • Gravitino vertex (~1/Mp) • Phase space / fermion masses (for light gravitino and heavy fermions)
2-body bi-linear R-violating decays Takayama, Yamaguchi Buchmuler et al. Suppressed by: • Gravitino vertex (~1/Mp) • Neutralino-neutrino mixing (model dependent)
Radiative 2-body trilinear R-violating decays SL, P. Osland, A. Raklev Suppressed by: • Gravitino vertex (~1/Mp) • Loop factors (~ fermion mass)
Radiative decays dominate for: Smaller gravitino masses R and L violation via operators of the 3rd generation Small neutrino-neutralino mixing Large gravitino lifetime (can be DM), due to: Gravitational suppression of its couplings Smallness of R-violating vertices Loop, phase space, or mixing effects Maximum stability (neither radiative nor tree-level decays)!
Radiative versus 3-body decays Couplings ~10^(-4) for consistency with the photon spectrum
NLSP decays - No source of suppression other than R-violating couplings - Decay well before BBN compatible with gravitino DM
R-violating signals: couplings & LSP decays R-parity violating coupling Ordinary MSSM neutralino coupling Neutr. Decays to 3 SM particles
Link to Flavour Effects in Fermion Masses (i.e. Why the top mass so much larger than all others?) Invariance under symmetry determines mass hierarchies • Charges such that only Top-coupling 0 flavour charge XAll others forbidden, only appear in higher orders Higher charge(lower generation) implies larger suppression
Flavour effects • SM symmetries allow 45 R-violating operators • Lepton & Baryon Parities forbid subsets of them Baryon Parity:only Bilinear R-violation allowed • Bilinear R-violation forbidden • μ term i.e. by Giudice-Masiero mech. • or Hall, Lykken, Weinberg mech. Lepton Parity:only If Z3not flavour-blind, could chose even subsets within
An example (King, Ross) R-violating couplings of 3rd generation (leading to large radiative decays) naturally higher
Neutrinos in R-violating SUSY 1-loop neutrino mass contributions:
R-violation: Correlated Rates depending on coupling combinations (A. de Gouvea, S.L, K. Tobe) To be compared with 160 and 0.92 in MSSM (where on shell photon penguin dominates)
Conclusions • R-violating SUSY equally motivated with MSSM • Interesting signals but also strong bounds • Possible to have both gravitino DM AND observable R-violation in colliders • Results sensitive to flavour effects Probe Flavour Structure of Fundamental Theory