1 / 39

Developing Personal Strategies

Developing Personal Strategies. Where are we in our thinking?. Is mathematics a set a rules and procedures that we must acquire through memorization? Is being good at math remembering what rule to apply? Has genetics blessed some students to be able to do mathematics?. Or Are We Thinking?.

quilla
Download Presentation

Developing Personal Strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing Personal Strategies

  2. Where are we in our thinking? • Is mathematics a set a rules and procedures that we must acquire through memorization? • Is being good at math remembering what rule to apply? • Has genetics blessed some students to be able to do mathematics?

  3. Or Are We Thinking? • The focus of mathematics is problem solving. • Children learn by constructing ideas. • Everyone can learn mathematics.

  4. Question on a provincial gr 9 assessement • 1 + 1 = ? 2 3 • 1 6 • 2 5 C) 3 2 • 5 6

  5. What are personal strategies? • Approaches to mental math and estimation. • Arithmetic operations • Algebraic operations • Drawing Algorithms

  6. Various types that may defined by the tools we use. • Mental mathematics • Paper and pencil • Technology

  7. It is important for teachers to realize that no matter what strategy they may teach, students will process it in many different ways.

  8. Dangers that may appear! • Blind acceptance of a strategy • Overzealous application • Belief that algorithms train the mind • Notion that one can be helpless without technology being available.

  9. A need to teach mental strategies constructively • Most teachers admit teaching paper and pencil algorithms about 90% of the time. • Formal written algorithms do have the advantage of working for all numbers. • The disadvantage is that they are not flexible and discourage student thinking. • Mental mathematics requires a choice of strategy and understanding.

  10. Now let us talk about strategies for mental math.

  11. What is 36 + 79?

  12. How about 25 +83?

  13. At the very heart of personal strategies is how the student can relate a difficult calculation into an easy one. • For example 28 + 27 is difficult But 30 +25 is easy. • 9x17 is hard But 10X17 – 17 is easier.

  14. Should we teach methods of mental math? • It may be unhelpful as students will use the method without understanding. • For example: A strategy of removing zeros when adding 70 + 20 becomes confusing when we consider 70 x 20 or even more prone to error when we attempt .

  15. What direction should we take? • We need to stop the 10min of mental math that emphasize accuracy and speed. • We should not concentrate on the right answer but instead look at the various ways the calculation is done. • Have students present a strategy and allow time for the students to practice it. • Mental math provides opportunities for students think for themselves.

  16. Suggestions from the Australians. • Instead of asking the students for a calculation do the reverse. • Provide plenty of time to work out a calculation asking questions like: Who can share how you did it? Do you understand that way? Who did it a different way? • Given a calculation and after finding the answer have students suggest a context for the calculation.

  17. So now we have students inventing strategies… • Teachers need to consider: • Is it efficient enough to be used regularly? • Is it mathematically valid? • Is it generalizable?

  18. Where’s the research? • Much of the research is based on the work of Piagets’ constructivism and Kamii’s work. • They found that when children are allowed to think for themselves, they “universally proceed from left to right.”

  19. Kamii worked in schools from 1989-91 There were four grades involved: Grade 1 – none of the four teachers taught algorithms Grade 2 – One of the three taught algorithms, one did not teach algorithms but parents did, and one taught no algorithms Grade 3 – two of the three teachers taught algorithms Grade 4 – all four taught algorithms

  20. Answers from grade 2 students for 7 + 52 + 186

  21. Answers from grade 3 students for 6+53 +185

  22. Answers from grade 4 students for 6 + 53 + 185

  23. Two other interesting findings in the grade 4 data were: • While about 8% of grade 3’s did not attempt an answer, this number jumped to about 25% of grade 4’s • A new way of writing answers such as “8,3,7” emerged.

  24. Kamii’s research led her to conclude that teaching algorithms can be harmful for two reasons. • It encourages children to give up their own thinking • It “unteaches” place value and prevents the development of number sense.

  25. What is the argument for teaching strategies or algorithms? • Many teachers believe that teaching algorithms is the most efficient method. • Many students, in particular, those that struggle, need a method for getting answers.

  26. How Teachers Undergo Change For teachers who make the transition, they usually follow a pattern • They teach arithmetic by teaching algorithms • Teach algorithms after laying the “groundwork for understanding”. • Teach no algorithms at all.

  27. Let us look at how students develop paper and pencil personal strategies

  28. Teaching Multidigit multiplication • Students will begin by using DIRECT MODELING. • For example if asked: There are 6 trays with 24 eggs in each tray, how many eggs are there altogether? Children may model using counters, base-ten materials, tally marks or other drawings.

  29. Students then might move to a complete number strategy such as repeated addition or doubling. For example in solving the egg problem A student might add 24 on six times to obtain 144. Or A student might add two 24’s three times to get three 48’s and then add these sums to get 144.

  30. Many students then move to a partitioning number strategy. • For example If we have 12 boxes with 177 books in each box, how many books do we have altogether? Students may calculate using an invented method such as 12 x 177 = (4 x 3) x 177 = 4 x (3 x 177)

  31. Partitioning using decade numbers • Example In a building there are 43 floors with 61 offices on each floor. How many offices are in the building? A student might find the sum of ten sets of 61 to be 610 and then add four sets of 610 to obtain 2440 and now add on three sets of 61 to obtain the solution of 2623.

  32. Another example of partitioning – Can you understand the students’ thinking? • There are 17 containers with 177 books in each container. How many books are there? Alberto wrote: 177 x 17 7 x 10 = 70 70 x 10 = 700 100 x 10 = 1000 1000 + 700 + 70 = 1770 = 885 1770 + 885 = 2655 177 + 177 = 354 2655 + 354 = 3009

  33. Compensation Strategy • How might we use compensation to solve these questions? • If I have five bags of jellybeans with 250 jellybeans in each bag, how many jellybeans do I have altogether? • There are 17 jars with 70 ladybugs in each jar. How many ladybugs are there altogether?

  34. A pattern appears to evolve for students inventing mutiplication strategies • “When teachers understand students’ invented strategies and their developmental paths they can help students move towards more sophisticated strategies” (Baek, 1998)

  35. The learner should never be told directly how to perform any operation in arithmetic… Nothing gives scholars so much confidence in their own powers and stimulates them so much to use their own efforts as to allow them to pursue their own methods and to encourage them in them.” (Colburn, 1970)

  36. Two important considerations. • Lappen (1995) states that there is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunity to learn …then the selection of the tasks with which the teacher engages the students in studying mathematics. • Kieren (1988) recommends that instruction should build on students’ understanding of fraction and use objects or contexts that have students acting on something or making sense of something rather instead of just manipulating symbols.

  37. And finally • Marilyn Burns (1994) “Imposing the standard arithmetic algorithms on children is pedagogically risky. It interferes with their learning, and it can give students the idea that mathematics is a collection of mysterious and magical rules and procedures that need to be memorized and practiced. Teaching children sequences of prescribed steps for computing focuses their attention on following the steps, rather than on making sense of numerical situations.”

  38. Some recommended resources. Fosnot, Catherine, and Maarten Dolk. Young Mathematicians at Work:Constructing Number Sense, Addition and Subtraction. Portsmouth, NH, 2001 Fosnot, Catherine, and Maarten Dolk. Young Mathematicians at Work:Constructing Multiplication and Division. Portsmouth, NH, 2001 Kamii, Constance. Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic. New York. Teachers College Press National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. The Teaching and Learning of Algorithms in School Mathematics. Reston, VA. NCTM. 1998

More Related