150 likes | 400 Views
Case Presentation: The modern management of oligodendrogliomas. James Manfield B.S. University College London. Background. Pt 25 y/o male marine CC First seizure HPC Otherwise well. No abnormal findings o/e. No significant PHM, FHM, DH, SH.
E N D
Case Presentation:The modern management of oligodendrogliomas James Manfield B.S. University College London
Background • Pt 25 y/o male marine • CC First seizure • HPC Otherwise well. No abnormal findings o/e. No significant PHM, FHM, DH, SH. • Underwent biopsy low-grade oligodendroglioma (1p19q not initially requested) • Referred to Dr. Wenke for debulking. • Successful stereotactic volumetric resection c. iop CT leaving 1 cm margins.
Oligodendrogliomas • Primary glial brain tumors. Grade II and Grade III (anaplastic) • Aetiology poorly understood • 5-19% of all intracranial tumors; 25% of all gliomas. M:F 2:1. Median age at D. 40-50 years. • Most common CC seizure (low grade), focal deficits, ↑ICP or cognitive deficits (high grade).
1p/19q: Why does it matter? • 1p/19q co-deletion, mediated by an unbalanced translocation of 19p to 1q. • Combined loss present in 60-70% of all ODs (Smith et al. 2000) • 1st CNS neoplasm in which a better genetic signature was correlated with outcome in phase III trials (Cairncross et al. 2006, Van den Bent et al. 2006).
Summary of data • Low grade OD/OA median 11.9 years with codeletion vs. 10.3 without [Shaw et. al 2002] • 5 years survival 50% higher [Fontaine et al 2008]. Confounding variables. • EORTC 26951: AOD 6-7 years c. co-deletion vs. 2-2.8 without combined loss [Cairncross et al. 2006, van den Bent et al. 2006]. • 1p19q found to be most powerful predictor of outcome [Kouwenhoven et al. 2009]. • Multiple studies now consistently show longer survival time. • Not prognostic but predictive [Weller et al. 2007]
Management: Surgery • 3 aims: tissue, mass effect ?better px • No RCT data • Retrospective study data has limitations • 1 uncontrolled study- complete resection in low-grade OD associated with longer disease-free intervals [Berger et al. 1994]. • Another study- subtotal resection improves survival [Shaw et al. 1997] • In contrast other studies looking at gross total resection have shown no survival benefit [Daumas-Duport 1997 & Kros et al. 1994]. • Nevertheless remains the standard of care.
Management: Radiotherapy Low grade • One large study on early vs. delayed RT observed an improved progression-free survival after early RT but no increase in overall survival [van den Bent 2005] Anaplastic • Mixed results • 1p19q status relevant
Management: Chemotherapy • PCV original regimen 2/3 of patients with recurrent OD have either a CR or PR to PCV. TtP around 12-18 months [Sofietti R et al 1998]. • AOD [Van den Bent 2008] 2 RCTs: • Temozolomide- 2 large phase II trials. Clear alternative. No formal comparison between TMZ and PCV.
Discussion • Cochrane Review: 2 RCTs. PCV + RT + surgery vs RT + surg- PCV delays progression, no effect on overall survival. [PCV haematological toxicity]. • RCTs confirmed the major predictive role of 1p/19q status. • 1p/19q status predicts more indolent behaviour and longer progression free survival after chemo or radiotherapy [Cochrane Review 2008]. • Appears to apply to both low grade and high grade tumors, although limited data in low grade ODs [Van den Bendt 2008] • Limitations of 1p/19q: With absent co-deletions still 33% show chemo response [Fontaine et al, 2008] • Predictive for response to both RT and chemo therefore not appropriate to differentiate.
Optimal management for our patient • What to do with a young patient, low grade tumor presenting with seizure. • Many treatment modalities available- given length of expected survival must consider late sequalae. • Debulking reasonable. Insufficient evidence to justify the risks of aggressive resection. • RT- cognitive decline etc. Without good RCT evidence otherwise prudent to observe and delay until progression. • Wish to delay RT major rationale for upfront chemotherapy- but no randomized data. Local side effects of 6 weeks RT vs systemic side effects 1 year chemotherapy. Ongoing EORTC trial. • 1p19q status may be useful. Potentially renders role of surgery less important. Consider early TMZ delaying RT.
Summary • OD tumors remain ultimately fatal • Lack of randomized data for optimal management. • With longer survival QOL issues and delayed side effects must be considered. • 1p19q co-deletion implies better outcome. • Predictive, not prognostic. Absence also does not exclude response. • A number of questions remain.
References • Smith JS, Perry A, Borell TJ, at al. Alterations of chromosome arms 1p and 19q as predictors of survival in oligodendrogliomas, astrocytomas, and mixed oligoastrocytomas. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):636-45. • Cairncross G, Berkey B, Shaw E, et al. Phase III trial of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9402. J Clin Oncol 2006 Jun 20;24 (18):2707-14. • van den Bent MJ, Carpentier AF, Brandes AA, et al. Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine improves progression-free survival but not overall survival in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas: a randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2715-22. • Shaw E, Arusell R, Scheithauer B, et al. Prospective randomized trial of low- versus high-dose radiation therapy in adults with supratentorial low-grade glioma: initial report of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 1;20(9):2267-76. • Fontaine D, Vandenbos F, Lebrun C, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic values of 1p and 19q deletions in adult gliomas: critical review of the literature and implications in daily clinical practice. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2008 Jun-Jul;164(6-7):595-604. Epub 2008 May 21. • Kouwenhoven MC, Gorlia T, Kros JM, et al. Molecular analysis of anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors in a prospective randomized study: A report from EORTC study 26951. Neuro Oncol. 2009 Dec;11(6):737-46. • Weller M, Berger H, Hartmann C, et al. Combined 1p/19q loss in oligodendroglial tumors: predictive or prognostic biomarker? Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Dec 1;13(23):6933-7. • Berger MS, Deliganis AV, Dobbins J, Keles GE. The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas. Cancer. 1994 Sep 15;74(6):1784-91. • Daumas-Duport C, Tucker ML, Kolles H, et al. Oligodendrogliomas. Part II: A new grading system based on morphological and imaging criteria. J Neurooncol. 1997 Aug;34(1):61-78. • Kros JM, Pieterman H, van Eden CG, Avezaat CJ. Oligodendroglioma: the Rotterdam-Dijkzigt experience. Neurosurgery. 1994 Jun;34(6):959-66; discussion 966. • van den Bent MJ, Afra D, de Witte O, et al. Long-term efficacy of early versus delayed radiotherapy for low-grade astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma in adults: the EORTC 22845 randomised trial. Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):985-90.
References cont. • Soffietti R, Rudà R, Bradac GB, Schiffer D. PCV chemotherapy for recurrent oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas. Neurosurgery. 1998 Nov;43(5):1066-73. • Van den Bent MJ, Reni M, Gatta G, Vecht C. Oligodendroglioma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Jun;66(3):262-72. Epub 2008 Feb 12. • Quon H, Abdulkarim B. Adjuvant treatment of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD007104. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007104.
Thank you! • Questions?