1 / 13

Biodiversity loss leading to economic loss: ten cases in Europe

Biodiversity loss leading to economic loss: ten cases in Europe. Marianne Kettunen www.ieep.org.uk Expert workshop - biodiversity and economics 5 October 2006 European Environmental Agency Copenhagen, Denmark. Structure of the presentation. Background – where do the 10 cases come from

rachel-fitzgerald
Download Presentation

Biodiversity loss leading to economic loss: ten cases in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Biodiversity loss leading to economic loss:ten cases in Europe Marianne Kettunen www.ieep.org.uk Expert workshop - biodiversity and economics 5 October 2006 European Environmental Agency Copenhagen, Denmark

  2. Structure of the presentation • Background –where do the 10 cases come from • Introduction to the 10 case • Case study insights • Value lost • Conclusions & concluding remarks

  3. Background • Commission / DG Env study (beginning 2006) • Objective: to bring together EU examples where biodiversity loss • loss / degradation of ecosystem services •  economic costs and / or social losses • Why: several examples exists but not documented • Illustrate costs & benefits of environmental conservation VS. cost & benefits of development initiatives • Methodology: questionnaire survey • 37 relevant examples  10 studies selected • Ecosystem services lost identified (according to MEA) • Aim to find “monetary evidence”

  4. Cases – introduction (1/2) • Decline / disappearance of three European native crayfish species(Atlantic area, Scandinavia and Circum-alpine regions) • Loss of ecosystem services provided by the Danube River basin & delta (Germany, Romania) • Loss of ecosystem services provided by former Lake Karla (Greece) • Depletion of the North Sea provisioning services • Loss of ecosystem services provided by peat bogs • (UK & Finland)

  5. Cases – introduction (2/2) • Loss of ecosystem services due to the plantation of non-native monoculture forests(Portugal) • Loss of ecosystem services due to eutrophication of coastal marine ecosystems(Sweden) • Value of cultural ecosystem services – case study on the recovery of ospreys(the UK) • Loss of a keystone species - the cost and benefits of beaver reintroduction(Germany) • Loss of provisioning ecosystem services in lagoon of Venice(Italy)

  6. Insights – what have we lost? • Biodiversity lost • Loss / degradation of natural ecosystems / habitats - both drastic and gradual • Declined species population levels • Loss / decline of keystone species • Change of dominant species / dominant species characteristics • Loss due to introduction of exotic species • Ecosystem services lost • Generally: almost all ecosystem services identified by MEA • Most commonly: food and fresh water • Water purification and waste management • Nutrient cycling • A range of cultural services

  7. Estimates of the lost value (1/2)

  8. Estimates of the lost value (2/2)

  9. Conclusions - general • Through out Europe a variety of ecosystems lost / degraded •  wide range of biodiversity-related services lost • Evidence of socio-economic costs exists • Loss of biodiversity / ecosystem services not generally included in decision making • If the cost and benefits arising from ecosystems services would have been considered •  more complete view of costs and benefits •  different decision taken

  10. Conclusions – counting our losses (1/2) • Often very difficult / impossible to form a complete picture of the real losses and benefits • Losses are not often directly apparent • ‘Long run’ effects of tradeoffs • Cost and benefits occur in different ecosystem and / or socio-economic sectors • Distribution of costs and benefits is biased between different stakeholders • benefits obtained on a private level VS. the associated costs often of more social nature

  11. Conclusions – counting our losses (2/2) • Limitations of knowledge • What is the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem properties? • What are the factors influencing environmental values? • Values from one ecosystem cannot be easily transferred to another ecosystem • When estimating the losses • Need to consider qualitative evidence • Need to be pragmatic and “inventive”

  12. Concluding remarks • The implications of biodiversity loss and related • ecosystem services should be adopted as an integral • part of future policy and decision-making processes • Tools that could be used • Comprehensive and integrated assessments at project level (eg EIAs) • Comprehensive and integrated assessments as a basis for regional land use planning and management • SWOT assessments • ‘Critical threshold’ concept • Precautionary approach • Ex post assessments • Integrating Natura 2000 areas into regional and local planning • Making stakeholders aware!

  13. Thank you! Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP)London / Brusselswww.ieep.org.uk

More Related