1 / 7

FESET – ESEP symposium Ethics in progress : from teaching to practice

FESET – ESEP symposium Ethics in progress : from teaching to practice. Program 18 april 2013. Introduction and remembrance of Anne Liebing by Sarah Banks (5 min.) Short introduction about ESEP By Kirsten Nohr (5 min.)

rachel
Download Presentation

FESET – ESEP symposium Ethics in progress : from teaching to practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FESET – ESEP symposiumEthics in progress: from teaching topractice Program 18 april 2013

  2. Introductionandremembrance of Anne Liebingby Sarah Banks (5 min.) • Short introductionabout ESEP By Kirsten Nohr (5 min.) • Introduction of the symposium – elaborationabout the program by Richard Anthone (10 minutes) • Presentation of Sarah Banks (15 min.) • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of Ed de Jonge • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Socraticdialogue Break • Presentation of Ana MarijaSoboca (15 min.) • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of Kirsten Nohr • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of François Gillet • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Presentation of Richard Anthone • Collectingquestions (5 min.) • Socraticdialogue Finish

  3. Working criteria

  4. Criteria for a gooddialogue • Take your time. A dialogue is a form of slow thinking, focused on depth. • Listen carefully. Ask questions. Transfer your thinking into the thinking of the other. Take a look at the world through the eyes of the other. • There is no need for an immediate decision. Understanding and understanding each other's ideas is sufficient. • Don't think as in an opposition to others (‘Yes, but '). Think with the others, think together as a single head ("Yes, and"). • Don’t get obsessed with finding solutions. Investigate the underlying reasons, values, or visions of a problem or a solution. • Make room for new thinking. Go beyond your old thinking.

  5. Criteria forgoodquestions • A good question contains a verb. Somethingyou do • A good question contains a concept toinvestigate, explore • The verbstimulates the process of inquiry • A good question is answerable = youanfindexamples • A good question creates commitment, the desiretoinvestigate.

  6. Examples • Can a good person be boring? • Can desires be educated? • Should social workers live exemplary? • Canyoulietoyourself? • Is unconditonal help possible? • Is caringforyourselfequaltocaringforanother • Is itallowedtointerferewithsomebodyelse life? • Is the connectionbetweenfreedomandresponsabilitynecessary? • Whathelpsyouto make goodchoices? • How do youdecidewhat is goodforyou?

  7. Aboutansweringquestions • Trytofindexampleswhich are factualandexperienced • Trytoconnect the answerto the question. • When an answer does not raise any further question then the answer is satisfactory and complete • When an answer is not subject of any possible counter-example, contradiction or exception then the answer is complete

More Related