1 / 28

Brief Review of “Leaching and Toxicity of CCA-Treated and Alternative-Treated Wood Products

Brief Review of “Leaching and Toxicity of CCA-Treated and Alternative-Treated Wood Products. Objectives. Conduct a side-by-side comparison of CCA-treated wood and alternative chemical-treated wood with respect to relative chemical leaching and relative aquatic toxicity of leachates

rad
Download Presentation

Brief Review of “Leaching and Toxicity of CCA-Treated and Alternative-Treated Wood Products

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Brief Review of“Leaching and Toxicity of CCA-Treated and Alternative-Treated Wood Products

  2. Objectives • Conduct a side-by-side comparison of CCA-treated wood and alternative chemical-treated wood with respect to relative chemical leaching and relative aquatic toxicity of leachates • Gather basic data that can be used as part of overall assessment of preserved wood types

  3. Wood Preservatives • CCA- chromated copper arsenate • ACQ- alkaline copper quaternary • CBA- copper boron azole • CC- copper citrate • CDDC- copper dimethyldithiocarbamate

  4. Leaching Tests • SPLP- Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure • TCLP- Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure • Synthetic seawater (Instant Ocean) • DI water

  5. Chemical LeachingResults

  6. Arsenic Concentrations Found in CCA-treated Wood Leachates TC= 5 mg/L DI TCLP SPLP SW

  7. DI TCLP SPLP SW Copper Concentrations Found in CCA-treated Wood Leachates

  8. Copper Boron Azole

  9. General Observations about Leaching Tests • For copper, TCLP and saltwater extract the most (DI and SPLP are equivalent) • TCLP extracts the most chromium • Arsenic leaching approximately equal for TCLP, SPLP and DI • Organic chemicals for the most part leach independent of leaching fluid

  10. Comparison of Copper Leachability(concentration in mg/l) SPLP

  11. Comparison of Copper Leachability(mass leaching in %) SPLP

  12. Aquatic Toxicity Assays Metplate Microtox Daphnia Algae

  13. Toxicity Expressions • EC50- mg/L or percent • LC50- mg/L or percent • IC50- mg/L or percent

  14. Comparison of Toxicity Tests(SPLP Leaching of CDDC)

  15. SPLP

  16. Copper as a Surrogate • Literature suggests that the copper leached from CCA is the primary toxicant to aquatic organisms • Does this apply to the alternative wood preservatives as well?

  17. Leachate EC50s (C.dubia) vs. Copper Concentrations

  18. General Observations • Alternative chemical treated wood chemicals exhibit a greater degree of aquatic toxicity • Most sensitive tests are algae and daphnia, followed by Metplate and Microtox

  19. Interpretation • Results show that alternative treated wood products are expected to leach more copper to aquatic systems • Since copper is a potent aquatic biocide, this raises a concern

  20. Interpretation • However, several additional factors will impact the true impact on an aquatic system: • Dilution • Sedimentation • Binding/Complexation

  21. Relative Risk • Results from previous work indicate risk from CCA-treated wood is greater with respect to human toxicity and waste management • Results from this work indicates that risk from alternative-treated wood is greater with respect to aquatic toxicity

  22. Initial Retention Level of Wood

  23. Initial Retention Level of Wood • Initial retentions measured by Timber Products Inspections Sept. & Nov. 2000 • Letter received from TPI on May 2002 stating the results for 1 sample were in error

  24. How Was This Addressed? 40 g Sawdust SPIB XRF Spectrum Digest UF Digest UM Digest TPI, XRF

  25. Results

  26. Average of 5 Labs Used in Final Report • Minor changes in % mass leached • Did not affect overall conclusion

  27. Updates to Report Text

  28. Questions Updated draft at www.ccaresearch.org Will be finalized on Jan. 15, 2003

More Related