410 likes | 428 Views
This article explores the transition from microscopic individual-based models to macroscopic continuum descriptions in the context of biological and chemical systems. It discusses the importance of capturing discreteness effects, stability analysis, and pattern formation in modeling processes close to extinctions. The text covers two simple individual-based models, including the Brownian bug model and a nonlocal density-dependent model, and emphasizes the significance of properly formulating continuum equations to retain discreteness effects. Various methods, such as Karhunen-Loeve decomposition and Master Equations, are detailed to derive macroscopic evolution equations accurately.
E N D
From microscopic dynamics to macroscopic evolution equations (and viceversa) Cristóbal López IMEDEA, Palma de Mallorca, Spain http://www.imedea.uib.es/PhysDept clopez@imedea.uib.es
Outline • First part: From micro to macro. • Introduction. • Two simple Individual Based Models and their continuum description. • Methods to derive continuum descriptions in terms of concentration or density fields. Second part: low dimensional systems from macroscopic descriptions and data. Karhunen-Loeve (KL)or Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) approach. - Brief introduction to KL. - A dynamical system model for observed coherent structures (vortices) in ocean satellite data.
as CONTINUOUS FIELDS BIOLOGICAL OR CHEMICAL SYSTEMS
The discrete nature of organisms or chemical molecules is missed in general when a continuum approach (reaction-diffusion) is used to model processes in Nature. This is specially important in situations close to extinctions, and other critical situations. However, continuum descriptions (in terms of concentration or density fields) have many advantages: stability analysis and pattern formation. Therefore, there is the need to formulate ‘Individual Based Models’ (IBMs), and then deriving continuum equations of these microscopic particle systems that still remain discreteness effects.
TWO SIMPLE INDIVIDUAL BASED MODELS AND THEIR CONTINUUM DESCRIPTION.
FIRST EXAMPLE One of the simplest IBM: Brownian bug model. Birth-death model with non-conserved total number of particles Young, Roberts and Stuhne, Reproductive pair correlations and the clustering of organisms, Nature 412, 328 (2001). - N particles perform independent Brownian* (random) motions in the continuum 2d physical space. - In addition, they undergo a branching process: They reproduce, giving rise to a new bug close to the parent, with probability l (per unit of time), or die with probability b . *The physical phenomenon that minute particles, immersed in a fluid, move about randomly.
l C→2Cautocatalisis, or reproduction b C→0death LET’S WRITE DOWN A MEAN-FIELD LIKE CONTINUUM EQUATION Modeling in terms of continuous concentration field:
l > b If l>b: explosion If l<b: extinction If l=b, simple diffusion Total number of particles l = b l < b
At the critical point (l=b), fluctuations are strong and lead to clustering NOT SIMPLE DIFFUSION Very simple mechanism: Reproductive correlations:Newborns are close to parents. This is missed in a continuous deterministic description in which birth is homogeneous
Making the continuum limit PROPERLY Demographic noise Fluctuations play a very important role and a proper continuum limit must be performed.
SECOND EXAMPLE Nonlocal density-dependent. Conserved total number of particles* . • N particles with positions (xi(t), yi(t)) in the 2d continuum physical space. • At every time step the positions of all the particles are update synchoronously as follows: N R(i) means the number of neighbors at distance smaller than R from bug i
Let’s write down the continuum version (mean-field) ri=(xi, yi) Take the limit Ito-Langevin Fokker-Planck Probability density or expected density
Discrete particle model Depending on the value of p
That is: • Fluctuations (noise) may have an important role. • The noise term is not trivial. Usually is a function of the density itself (multiplicative noise). • In order to reproduce spatial structures: mean-field like descriptions are better when the total number of particles is conserved. • We have looked at pattern formation, but there are other features not properly reproduced. E.g. in birth-death models typically there are transitions extinction-survival where the values of the parameters are not captured. • STATISTICAL PHYSICS HAVE DEVELOPED DIFFERENT METHODS TO OBTAIN THE RIGHT MACROSCOPIC EQUATIONS. IN FACT THIS IS A CENTRAL TOPIC IN STATISTICAL PHYSICS.
MODELS WITH PARTICLES APPEARING AND DISAPPEARING (NON CONSERVED NUMBER) Second quantization or Fock space or anhilation-creation operators or Doi-Peliti techniques • Put the particles in a lattice (of L sites), and consider the number of particles at each site (N1, N2,…, NL). • Write the Master Equation for the time evolution of the probability of these numbers. • Represent the Master Equation in terms of a (quantum mechanical like) Hamiltonian constructed with creation and annihilation operators. • Find the action associated to that Hamiltonian. Go again off-lattice by performing the continuum limit. • Approximate the action by keeping only quadratic terms, so that a Langevin equation for an auxiliary density-like field can be extracted from it.
WHAT IS A MASTER EQUATION? It is a first order differential equation describing the time evolution of the probability of having a given configuration of discrete states. If P(N1, N2, …)= probability of having N1 particles in the first node, etc…
MODELS WITH CONSERVED NUMBER OF PARTICLES A system of N interacting Brownian dynamics Gaussian White noise Interaction potential DENSITY
SECOND PART OF THE TALK How to obtain low-dimensional systems from macroscopic descriptions and data. The Karhunen-Loeve (KL) or Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) approach.
SOME WORDS ON KL Original aim: To identify in an objective way coherent structures in a turbulent flow (or in a sequence of configurations of a complex evolving field). What it really does: Finds an optimal Euclidian space containing most of the data. Finds the most persistent modes of fluctuation around the mean.
KL or POD provides an orthonormal basis for a modal decomposition in a functional space. Therefore, if U(x,t) is a temporal series of spatial patterns (spatiotemporal data series). Temporal average Amplitude functions Empirical orthogonal eigenfunctions They are the eigenfunctions of the covariance matrix C of the data Eigenvalue
WHY THIS PARTICULAR BASIS? It separates a given data set into orthogonal spatial and temporal modes which most efficiently describe the variability of the data set. Therefore, can be understood as a spatial pattern contained in the data set with its own dynamics (coherent structure). The stronger its eigenvalue the more its ‘relevance’ in the data set. The ai(t) provides the temporal evolution of the corresponding coherent structure. The decomposition is optimum in the sense that if we order the eigenvalues by decreasing size: we may recover the signal with just a few eigenfunctions Where and Resid has no physical relevance.
Physical meaning Temporal modes Spatial modes Seasonal variability Two vortices Almería-Orán front
Interesting property • The minimum error in reconstructing an image sequence via linear combinations of a basis set is obtained when the • basis is the EOF basis.
The data filtered to the coherent structure represented by eigenfunctions 3 and 4
Eddies Baroclinic instability Two-layer quasigeostrophic model
We can make bifurcation analysis, study periodicities and etc with the simple dynamical system.
CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES • We have experience with mathematical/physical tools that allow to describe, with macroscopic or collective variables, systems of interacting individuals. • We have experience with mathematical/physical tools to obtain low-dimensional dynamical systems from data of complex spatio-temporal fields.
Relation with PATRES • Study of spatial patterns for bacteria dynamics. Role of multiplicative noise term? • Macroscopic descriptions of social systems with a particular topology of the interaction network? • Patterns of behavior and Coherent structures in data. How can the KL help?
Continuum description Master equation in a lattice
Using the Fock space representation Bosonic conmutation rules Defining the many-particle state .
One can obtain a Schrodinger-like equation which defines a Hamiltonian
3. Going to the Fock space representation Defining the many-particle state
Interesting properties • The minimum error in reconstructing an image sequence via linear combinations of a basis set is obtained when the • basis is the EOF basis.
0. Extract the temporal mean of the image ensemble: • Y(x,t)=Image(x,t) - <Image(x,t)>t • Calculate correlation matrix: • Solve the eigenvalue problem: • And the reconstructed images are Imagine we have a sequence of data (film): Image(x,t) Eigenvalues p is the number of relevant eigenfunctions k=1,…,p: Empirical Orthogonal Eigenfunctions (EOFs) : Temporal amplitudes
Bifurcation analysis in the eddy viscosity 2 stable fixed points and 4 unstable Hopf bifurcation. Limit cycle with aprox. 6 months period Limit cycle persists and no new bifurcation occurs