240 likes | 392 Views
Introduction to Minority Official Language Rights. Minority Official Language Rights. Presentation Outline. The Framework The Greater Context The Legal Structure Constitutional Legislation Federal Laws Provincial Laws Municipal Laws. Introductory Comments.
E N D
Introduction to Minority Official Language Rights Minority Official Language Rights
Presentation Outline • The Framework • The Greater Context • The Legal Structure • Constitutional Legislation • Federal Laws • Provincial Laws • Municipal Laws
Introductory Comments • Why is Canada a bilingual country? • How is Canada’s bilingualism expressed? • What are the official language rights and when are they protected? • When is a language issue not a right?
The Framework Canadian law recognizes that • both English & French communities played an important role in the founding of Canada; • language is a fundamental aspect of individual identity & expression of culture; • bilingual character is a fundamental aspect of Canadian national identity;
The Framework (cont’d) • Definition of bilingualism • Our bilingualism • Is seen in the language-related rules and programs that are in place. • Stems from constitutional and governmental commitments to equality of both languages in the public sphere.
The Framework (cont’d) Constitutionally-Protected Language Rights • ensure flourishing of the two official language communities; • protect rights of our two official languages (English and French) speaking communities when they are in a position of minority.
The Framework (cont’d) Official Language Rights are a “collective right”: • different from the “individual rights”; • applies to people acting together ; • protects the group, its culture ; • justified by the interests of a minority group; • accessible only by belonging to a group.
The Greater Context To understand exact nature of constitutional language rights, it is important to look at: • what is a constitutional right; • what is the structure of constitutional language rights; and • how do they fit with other Canadian laws and rights?
Constitution Act, 1867 Sections 91 and 92
Legal Structure: Overview Power over language is • not listed in the Constitution; • tied to each particular non-language subject matter; • divided between federal and provincial /territorial government. Some official language rights are constitutionally-protected, some are not.
Legal Structure: Result • a set of federal language laws, AND • a set of language laws (or no language law) for each province and territory. Many of these laws continue to be examined, debated and challenged in Canadian courts.
Legal Structure: Summary Constitutional Legislation • most permanent; enshrined; harder to change • applies to four categories across Canada: 3 in federal domain, one in the provincial domain Federal Legislation • topics listed in s.91 of CA 1867 Provincial Legislation • only to topics listed in s.92 of CA 1867; contain some language rights; varies. s.93 Municipal Legislation • varies
Constitutional Legislation Overarching legislation • kinds of laws that are, in a way, “higher” than other laws • like an umbrella • dictate how other laws are going to be made • the “big bosses” of laws: any laws “under” them have to abide • BUT, if the laws under them do NOT relate to a topic on the LIST, their power does not apply.
Constitutional Legislation (cont’d) Most permanent commitment to bilingualism comes from rights in constitutional documents: • the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, • section 133 of CA 1867, and • section 23 of the Manitoba Act, 1870.
Constitutional Legislation (cont’d) • guarantee, under certain conditions, minority language rights in: • education (provincial) • governmental communications and services (federal) • legislation and publications (federal) • judicial rights (federal)
Federal Laws • Additional laws passed by federal government; related only to topics in s.91 of CA 1867. • related ONLY to federal law and federal government.Example: the federal Official Languages Act • One way the federal parliament puts constitutional language rights into action.
Provincial Laws • Laws passed by provincial/territorial governments, related only to topics in s.92 of CA 1867. • Lots of these laws: New Brunswick, Manitoba, Ontario. • Less or almost none: British Columbia. • BUT – even if they don’t have “laws”, doesn’t mean you cannot get French services. • Policies developed by a department or ministry; In such instances, official minority language communication and services are a matter of policy, not of right.
Municipal Laws • Municipalities also vary: some have passed by-laws, some have not. • Winnipeg and Ottawa. • Some smaller municipalities, especially if they were founded by speakers of the other official language, may be quite bilingual. • Lac La Biche, AB • May be a matter of policy.
Legal Structure: Summary Constitutional Legislation • most permanent; enshrined; harder to change • applies to four categories across Canada: 3 in federal domain, one in the provincial domain Federal Legislation • topics listed in s.91 of CA 1867 Provincial Legislation • topics listed in s.92 of CA 1867 ; contain some language rights; vary; s.93 Municipal Legislation • vary