1 / 6

Point/Counterpoint on Queue State Management

Point/Counterpoint on Queue State Management. John Kowalski, Srini Kandala, Shugong Xu, Satoshi Terada, Minoru Takemoto, Yoshihiro Ohtani Sharp. Background. We at Sharp have considered the Queue State Management vs. MAC signaling for TSPEC.

rafael-craft
Download Presentation

Point/Counterpoint on Queue State Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Point/Counterpoint on Queue State Management John Kowalski, Srini Kandala, Shugong Xu, Satoshi Terada, Minoru Takemoto, Yoshihiro Ohtani Sharp John Kowalski, et.al., Sharp

  2. Background • We at Sharp have considered the Queue State Management vs. MAC signaling for TSPEC. • We want a spec that is useful now AND can have a long, happy, productive life. • So, here’s the argument, and our conclusions. John Kowalski, et.al., Sharp

  3. Points/Counterpoints (1) • Queue State management does not, at present, provide a way to signal some L2 dependent parameters. However: • All things being equal and there is a mechanism to transfer all necessary L2 parameters, then the 2 methods would be functionally the same. John Kowalski, et.al., Sharp

  4. Points/Counterpoints (2) • We have MAC signaling now, and it’s complete enough (with added signaling being presented this week) for our purposes. • We have it NOW and L3 signaling would have to be explicitly defined for AV and other non-internet applications= DELAY IN STANDARDIZATION. John Kowalski, et.al., Sharp

  5. Points/Counterpoints (3) • We still Need some mechanism to signal delayed ACK/FEC from higher layers-regardless of method. But the MAC signaling exists right now. • RSVP is an OPTIONAL part IPv6, and not widely deployed. John Kowalski, et.al., Sharp

  6. Conclusions TSPEC is here, functionally equivalent and can be easily adapted to any higher layer signaling. More Definition is better than less!   John Kowalski, et.al., Sharp

More Related