1 / 24

NASDEV PRESENTATION

NASDEV PRESENTATION. “AN OVERVIEW OF THE NATURE, FORM AND APPLICATION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS AT UJ”. Presented by: Pura Mgolombane (Mr) Dean: Student Affairs (Acting) 25 May 2007. PRESENTATION OVERVIEW.

rafael
Download Presentation

NASDEV PRESENTATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NASDEV PRESENTATION “AN OVERVIEW OF THE NATURE, FORM AND APPLICATION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS AT UJ” Presented by: Pura Mgolombane (Mr) Dean: Student Affairs (Acting) 25 May 2007

  2. PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • 1.PHASE ONE: RENEWAL INTERGRATION PROCESS (RIP) • 2. PHASE ONE: DELIVERABLES • 3. PHASE THREE: STRUCTURES • 4. CONCLUSION

  3. PHASE I • THE UJ RIP

  4. INTRODUCTION A project steering committee, responsible for the business issues associated with the project was set-up to: • Take on responsibility for the achievement of the project outcomes; • Ensure the project's scope alignment with the agreed requirements of the Business Owners and key stakeholder groups; • Provide those directly involved in the project with guidance on project business issues; • Sign off documentation at relevant stages of the project as mandated representatives of the function.

  5. 2.SELECTION OF STEERING COMMITTEE An initial communication session was conducted with all the related Student Affairs functions as invited by UJ HR. During this session it was agreed that the project will only include the functional areas as per the MEC directive. The persons attending the session was nominated and selected as the Steercom: • Dr Segopane Seroka; Ms Nita van den Berg; • Mr Hendrik Krüger; • Ms Daleen Strydom; • Mr Godfrey Helani; Ms Lynette Pringle; • Mr Pura Mgolombane; • Mr Kenneth Ntombela; and Mr Mandla Simelane.

  6. 3.STRATEGY The outcomes for the strategy element within the Operating Model included the: • Guiding principles; • Vision; • Mission; and • Strategic objectives.

  7. 4. GUIDING PRINCIPLES • GUIDING PRINCIPLES ARTICULATED SHARED • ORGANISATIONAL VALUES WHICH UNDERLIE THE: • STRATEGIC VISION AND MISSION & • SERVE AS A BASIS FOR INTEGRATED DECISION MAKING.

  8. 5. OPERATING MODEL GUIDING PRINCIPLES

  9. 6.CONCEPTUAL STRATEGY DEFINED To define a conceptual strategy for Student Affairs, three elements were defined: • Vision statement – to express an element of ambition encapsulating what the function aspires to achieve; • Mission statement - to define the strategic means through which the function intends realising the vision. • Strategic objectives – to define the function’s articulated aims.

  10. 7.STUDENT AFFAIRS’ VISION, MISSION & STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES • VISION • TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR AN OPTIMAL (UNIVERSITY) • EXPERIENCE TO ALL STUDENTS.

  11. 8. MISSION

  12. 9.STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

  13. PHASE II DELIVERABLES

  14. 1.DECISION MAKING GUIDING PRINCIPLES • The leadership team is accountable and responsible for the strategic decisions taken for Student Affairs.The leadership team should provide strategic direction for each of the key functions in conjunction with the senior managers and any other relevant party.

  15. 2. KEY DECISIONS MADE WITHIN THE DIVISION

  16. 3. CALENDAR

  17. 4. KEY MEETINGS NEEDED

  18. 5. SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS (SLAS)

  19. PHASE III • STRUCTURES

  20. 1. STUDENT AFFAIRS STRUCTURES (TWR & RAU)

  21. 2. STUDENT AFFAIRS (RAU)

  22. 3. STUDENT AFFAIRS STRUCTURE UJ

  23. 4. STUDENT AFFAIRS STRUCTURE UJ

  24. 5. CONCLUSION • This process reflects the current and future states of the operating model in terms of the: • Strategy, Processes, Culture and Performance, • Information and Organisation Architecture, • Human Resource Management Architecture elements, • The associated gaps, and the Key Performance Areas (KPAs).

More Related