1 / 28

Gravitational Experiments and Lorentz Violation

Gravitational Experiments and Lorentz Violation. Jay D. Tasson V. Alan Kosteleck ý Indiana University. TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A. outline. introduction motivation Standard-Model Extension (SME)

rafiki
Download Presentation

Gravitational Experiments and Lorentz Violation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gravitational Experimentsand Lorentz Violation Jay D. Tasson V. Alan Kostelecký Indiana University TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  2. outline • introduction • motivation • Standard-Model Extension (SME) • recent gravitational tests • Lorentz violation in matter-gravity couplings1,2 • theoretical analysis • new sensitivities in gravitational experiments • Kostelecký, Tasson PRL ’09 • Kostelecký, Tasson in preparation

  3. motivation • General Relativity and the Standard Model describe known physics. • new physics at the Planck scale ( ) • options for probing such high energies • galaxy-sized accelerator • suppressed effects in sensitive experiments Lorentz violation • can arise in theories of new physics • difficult to mimic with conventional effects

  4. Standard-Model Extension (SME) effective field theory which contains: • General Relativity (GR) • Standard Model (SM) • arbitrary coordinate-independent Lorentz violation • as a subset, other test frameworks Lorentz-violating terms • constructed from GR and SM fields • parameterized by coefficients for Lorentz violation • samples Colladay & Kostelecký PRD ’97, ’98 Kostelecký PRD ’04

  5. What is Lorentz violation? consider the flat spacetime example under an observer Lorentz transformation (rotation) physics is unchanged

  6. What is Lorentz violation? consider the flat spacetime example under a particle Lorentz transformation (rotation) Lorentz violation!

  7. ongoing searches with...

  8. ongoing searches with... Tests based on

  9. ongoing searches with... Tests based on Results to date

  10. ongoing searches with... Tests based on Results to date Many more tests proposed.

  11. ongoing searches with... Tests based on Results to date Many more tests proposed. See Mike Seifert’s talk.

  12. Ongoing searches with... • spin-polarized solids (Adelberger, Heckel, …) • clock comparisons (Gibble, Hunter, Romalis, Walsworth, …) • CMB analysis • astrophysical photon decay • cosmological birefringence • pulsar-timing observations • particle traps (Dehmelt,Gabrielse, …) • resonant cavities (Lipa, Mueller, Peters, Schiller, Wolf, …) • neutrino oscillations (LSND, MINOS, Super K, …) • muons (Hughes, BNL g-2) • meson oscillations(BABAR, BELLE, DELPHI, FOCUS, KTeV, OPAL, …)

  13. Ongoing searches with... • spin-polarized solids(Adelberger, Heckel, …) • clock comparisons(Gibble, Hunter, Romalis, Walsworth, …) • CMB analysis • astrophysical photon decay • cosmological birefringence • pulsar-timing observations • particle traps (Dehmelt,Gabrielse, …) • resonant cavities (Lipa, Mueller, Peters, Schiller, Wolf, …) • neutrino oscillations (LSND, MINOS, Super K, …) • muons (Hughes, BNL g-2) • meson oscillations(BABAR, BELLE, DELPHI, FOCUS, KTeV, OPAL, …)

  14. Ongoing searches with... • spin-polarized solids (Adelberger, Heckel, …) • clock comparisons (Gibble, Hunter, Romalis, Walsworth, …) • CMB analysis • astrophysical photon decay • cosmological birefringence • pulsar-timing observations • particle traps (Dehmelt,Gabrielse, …) • resonant cavities (Lipa, Mueller, Peters, Schiller, Wolf, …) • neutrino oscillations (LSND, MINOS, Super K, …) • muons (Hughes, BNL g-2) • meson oscillations(BABAR, BELLE, DELPHI, FOCUS, KTeV, OPAL, …)

  15. Ongoing searches with... • spin-polarized solids (Adelberger, Heckel, …) • clock-comparisons (Gibble, Hunter, Romalis, Walsworth, …) • CMB analysis • astrophysical photon decay • cosmological birefringence • pulsar-timing observations • particle traps (Dehmelt,Gabrielse, …) • resonant cavities (Lipa, Mueller, Peters, Schiller, Wolf, …) • neutrino oscillations (LSND, MINOS, Super K, …) • muons (Hughes, BNL g-2) • meson oscillations(BABAR, BELLE, DELPHI, FOCUS, KTeV, OPAL, …) • only ~1/2 of lowest order couplings explored • use gravitational couplings and experiments to get more!

  16. gravitationally coupled fermions1 vierbein • coefficients for Lorentz violation • particle-species dependent additional coefficients for LV, non-minimal torsion, … covariant derivative for spacetime as well as U(1) • Idea : • new gravitational couplings provide new LV sensitivity • explore coefficient unobservable in flat spacetime • Kostelecký, Tasson PRL ’09 1) Kostelecký PRD ’04

  17. gravitationally coupled fermions1 vierbein • coefficients for Lorentz violation • particle-species dependent additional coefficients for LV, non-minimal torsion, … covariant derivative for spacetime as well as U(1) • Idea : • new gravitational couplings provide new LV sensitivity • explore coefficient unobservable in flat spacetime • Kostelecký, Tasson PRL ’09 What is the form of ? Where does it come from? 1) Kostelecký PRD ’04

  18. Lorentz-symmetry breaking • explicit • Lorentz violation is a predetermined property of the spacetime • inconsistent with Riemannian geometry • spontaneous • LV arises dynamically • consistent with geometry • possible in numerous underlying theories: string theory, quantum gravity … • upon investigating spontaneous breaking we find Minkowski-spacetime coefficients characterize couplings in dynamical theories

  19. countershaded Lorentz violation unobservable shift in fermion phase observable effects via gravity coupling • for matter is unobservable in flat-spacetime tests • observable effects are suppressed by the gravitational field • could be large (~ 1eV) relative to existing matter-sector bounds c.f. GeV

  20. path to experimental analysis Lfermionexpand to desired order in LV and gravity field redefinition L’fermion Euler-Lagrange eq. HRelativistic relativistic quantum experiments Foldy-Wouthuysen expansion HNonRel non-relativistic quantum experiments inspection LClassical non-relativistic quantum experiments classical experiments

  21. relativistic hamiltonian Hrel=

  22. S and T denote composite coefficients for source and test respectively experimental implications • gravimeter tests • tests of Weak Equivalence • laboratory • space based • Lunar laser ranging • exotic tests • charged matter • antimatter • higher generation matter • light-travel tests • …

  23. S and T denote composite coefficients for source and test respectively experimental implications • gravimeter tests • tests of Weak Equivalence • laboratory • space based • Lunar laser ranging • exotic tests • charged matter • antimatter • higher generation matter • light-travel experiments • …

  24. Sun-centered frame • standard frame for reporting SME bounds • boost and rotation of test annual & sidereal variations

  25. lab tests • differential acceleration for test-particles A and B • monitor acceleration of one particle over time gravimeter • monitor relative behavior of particles - EP test • frequency and phase distinguish from other effects

  26. experimental sensitivities • one bound1 based on torsion-pendulum data2 • excellent prospects for remaining 11 coefficients in current and future experiments [] = crude estimate for existing experiment {} = crude estimate for future experiment 1) Kostelecký, Tasson PRL ’09 2) Schlamminger et al. PRL ’08

  27. experimental sensitivities • one bound1 based on torsion-pendulum data2 • excellent prospects for remaining 11 coefficients in current and future experiments • multiple experiments needed for maximum number of sensitivities • other coefficients yield additional effects1,3 [] = crude estimate for existing experiment {} = crude estimate for future experiment 1) Kostelecký, Tasson PRL ’09 2) Schlamminger et al. PRL ’08 3) Kostelecký, Tasson in prep.

  28. Summary • Lorentz violation introduces qualitatively new signals in gravitational experiments • several experiments performed • much remains unexplored • comparatively large • detectable in current and planned tests • multiple tests needed for maximum independent sensitivities

More Related