230 likes | 392 Views
Using the law to improve forest governance Case studies from C&W Africa and the EU 11 October, 2018. Contents. Forests From the EU - using law Benefit sharing Forest conversion Illegal logging. Why forests From the EU – using law. Why forests.
E N D
Using the law to improve forest governance Case studies from C&W Africa and the EU 11 October, 2018
Contents Forests From the EU - usinglaw Benefit sharing Forest conversion Illegallogging
Why forests • From the EU – using law
Why forests • 1.6 billion people worldwide depend on forests • +/- 10% of greenhouse gas emissions caused by forest destruction • 80% of the world’s terrestrial species live in forests • Use of natural resources (including timber) used to fuel conflict • Lost revenue from illegal logging estimated at £23 billion every year • Competing demands for land (including forests) are increasing
From the EU – using law • Illegal logging was historically the main driver of deforestation • 50-70% of tropical deforestation now from conversion for agriculture • Half of which is driven by overseas demand for ag commodities • Exports worth +/- US$61 billion • Weak forest governance + existing market regulation = current situation • Increasing demand for land for natural resource production, climate objectives, and economic development – nationally and internationally • Use law to strengthen forest governance and market regulation
Ivory Coast Consultation with civil society and village chiefs in Guiglo
Benefit sharing • A right to share in the benefits derived from the use of land • Linked with ownership of the resources that generate the benefits – ownership or use rights • Responsibility can sit with the state and/or private organisations • Proportion of the company’s profits from the concession – or – a percentage of the product harvested
Benefit sharing • Disbursed through a community development fund – or through a government institution • While the right to derive a benefit may exist on paper – making that work in practice is a different challenge • Need for clarity for companies – and to ensure that forest communities can derive an appropriate benefit
Legal Working Group meeting - Liberia Examples (A)
Benefit sharing • Liberia - • Companies must pay land rent to communities by entering into social agreements • LWG produced guidance with the National Union of Community Forest Development Committees • Outline of legal framework • Standard terms • Template agreement • Gabon – • Forest Code 2001 outlines benefit sharing – but not how to agree them • LWG develops key components for an implementing decree • 2014 – Ministry of Forestry passes a legal text • Technical guidance agreed by LWG and used to inform agreements • Ministry of Forests endorses the Guide
Forest conversion • Numerous voluntary, non-legally binding, commitments exist, e.g. • Consumer Goods Forum – zero net deforestation by 2020 • Amsterdam Declaratoin – support private and public initiatives to halt deforestation by 2020 • New York Declaration on Forests – halve deforestation by 2020. End it by 2030 • Practical challenge to achieve them – lack of clear governance framework • IPCC Special Report (Oct 2018) – global emissions decline “well before 2030” • Unintended consequences?
Forest conversion • Legal frameworks to govern forest conversion are crucial – and complex. • Need to determine – what is allowed – what is forbidden – what conditions must be followed to clear forest land. • Involves: • Land allocation • Effective permits • How is timber commercialised • Protection of the environment • Recognition of communities’ rights
Illegal logging • EU law to prevent trade of illegal timber – EU Timber Regulation • Came into force – 2013 • Complementary legislation in USA, Australia – potentially beyond • CE’s work – information, implementation, enforcement • With regulators, civil society and private sector – in the EU and internationally
Illegal logging • What is illegal logging? • If a benefit sharing agreement has not been respected? • If the timber comes from unregulated forest conversion? • Opportunity to recognise risks arising from unclear forest governance frameworks • Recognise similar issues with enforcement/implementation in the EU/internationally