1 / 33

An Autonomous Inexpensive Robust CO 2 Analyzer (AIRCOA)

An Autonomous Inexpensive Robust CO 2 Analyzer (AIRCOA). Britton Stephens, Andrew Watt, and Gordon Maclean National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Using high frequency data makes signals bigger, but the annual-mean signals are still very small:.

raina
Download Presentation

An Autonomous Inexpensive Robust CO 2 Analyzer (AIRCOA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Autonomous Inexpensive Robust CO2 Analyzer (AIRCOA) Britton Stephens, Andrew Watt, and Gordon Maclean National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

  2. Using high frequency data makes signals bigger, but the annual-mean signals are still very small: To measure 0.2 GtCyr-1 source/sink to +/- 25% need to measure regional annual mean gradients to 0.1-0.2 ppm Flux footprint, in ppm(GtCyr-1)-1, for a 106 km2 chaparral region in the U.S. Southwest (Gloor et al., 1999).

  3. NCAR CO2 and O2/N2 Calibration Facility

  4. CO2 signal averaged over 2.5 min. measurement cycle

  5. Calibration sequence

  6. Empirical pressure correction

  7. Empirical temperature correction SPL 9/4-9/18 NWR 9/18

  8. Drying system monitoring A change of 0.5% RH is approximately 300 ppm H2O, which would cause a dilution error of 0.1 ppm in CO2

  9. Nafion absorption effect Flow pulled through Nafion went from 300 to 50 sccm at t = 30 sec

  10. Empirical flushing correction

  11. Automated (4- or 8-hourly) leak checks A positive trend of 0.3 kPa/min would be a leak rate of 0.1 sccm which if 100 ppm different would cause a 0.1 ppm bias

  12. Regulator oven tests Three cylinders were in the oven and one (green dots) was not

  13. Regulator flushing tests

  14. Laboratory intercomparisons Laboratory offsets less than 0.05 ppm (1-sigma = 0.13 ppm) Field surveillance tanks 2.5-month average field differences from assigned values 0.01 to 0.10 ppm (1-sigma = 0.10 to 0.13 ppm)

  15. Automated web-based output http://www.eol.ucar.edu/~stephens/RACCOON

  16. Power Budget

More Related