230 likes | 248 Views
LRO System Requirements Review Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) Investigation Requirements & Implementation. John Cavanaugh LOLA Instrument Systems Engineer NASA GSFC. LOLA Organization Chart. LOLA Overview. LOLA Instrument. Functional Description
E N D
LRO System Requirements ReviewLunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) Investigation Requirements & Implementation John CavanaughLOLA Instrument Systems EngineerNASA GSFC
LOLA Overview LOLA Instrument Functional Description Using a single pulsed laser split into five beams LOLA will measure : • Range to the Lunar Surface • Pulse time of flight method • Single threshold crossing • leading edge & trailing edge timing • Each measurement referenced to S/C MET • Surface Direct Reflectance • Transmitted laser energy before splitter • Received signal energy from each of five detectors From these measurements and LRO S/C data products the LOLA Science team will produce : • Lunar Digital Elevation Model • Localized surface roughness and slope data for landing site characterization • Surface reflectance data • Imaging of permanently shadowed regions • Lunar geodetic coordinate system • LRO precision orbit and trajectory • Lunar gravity model DOE Beam Splitter Radiator Beam Expander Receiver Telescope Laser Bench Detectors & Aft Optics (2 more on far side) Main Optical Bench S/C Deck Main Electronics Box
Heritage Design Elements Laser : MLA, GLAS, SLA, MOLA DPSSL Nd:YAG slab oscillator Crossed-porro resonator configuration Passive Q-switch ( MLA, GLAS ) Laser diodes from Coherent ( MLA ) Beryllium beam expander telescope ( MLA ) Receiver Telescope : MLA Refractor design Beryllium tube Fiber coupling to aft optics Detector : MLA, GLAS, SLA, MOLA SiAPD hybrid with programmable gain (MLA, GLAS) Range Measurement Unit : MLA Low-speed coarse counter High resolution ASIC Power Converters : MLA, GLAS, MOLA Signal Processing Algorithm : MLA, MOLA Range gate tracking Active gain & threshold control with signal & noise feedback Implemented in 80C196 (MLA), 8086 (MOLA), 80K85 (LOLA) Beryllium structure : MLA, GLAS, MOLA LOLA Heritage
LRO-LOLA Instrument Document Tree LRO Project Requirements ESMD-RLEP-0010 LRO Mission Requirements Document 431-RQMT-00004 LRO Technical Resource Allocations 431-RQMT-00112 LRO Pointing and Alignment Requirements LRO CM DOC’S LRO E ICD 431-ICD-00008 LRO M ICD 431-ICD-000NN LRO Gnd Sys ICD 431-ICD-00049 LOLA EICD 431-ICD-00098 LOLA TICD 431-ICD-000117 LOLA MICD 431-ICD-000089 LOLA DICD 431-ICD-00108 LOLA Science and Functional Requirements LOLA-RQMT-0002 LOLA System Implementation Plan LOLA-PLAN-000N LOLA Interface Drawings LOLA Configuration Management Plan LOLA-PLAN-0001 LOLA Performance Assurance Implementation Plan LOLA-PLAN-0003 LOLA Assembly Drawings LOLA Sub-Assembly Drawings LOLA CM DOC’S LOLA Integration and Test Plan LOLA-PLAN-00NN LOLA System Engineering Management Plan LOLA-PLAN-0010 LOLA Component Drawings LOLA Schematics LOLA Safety Plan LOLA-PLAN-00NN LOLA Risk Management Plan LOLA-PLAN-00NN LOLA Contamination Control Plan LOLA-PLAN-0004
LRO Document Flowdown (Lamp’s version)
LOLA Constraints on LRO • Provide stable timebase frequency for LOLA range measurement • Operate LOLA continuously throughout the measurement phase. • Maintain S/C pointing within ±1° of nadir for >97% of the measurement phase. • Provide post-processed pointing knowledge to within 150 µrad each axis (3-sigma) at 1 second intervals. • Angular Exclusion : 1.5 millirads around boresight. • Align LOLA beam pattern to within ±1° of S/C velocity vector. • Provide precision positioning knowledge data of LRO spacecraft for post-processing of LOLA data. • Provide a 1 PPS time signal and associated MET message on orbit. • Provide post-processed time with 3 ms accuracy relative to UTC. • Provide means to reference LOLA optical axis to S/C coordinates during I&T
LOLA Verification TESTING (Levels): • Ranging Performance (Instr. & S/C): • Provide simulated range returns via pulsed optical signals and CW background into each detector via fiber optic test port. • Signal Processing (Instr. & S/C): • Simulate lunar orbit signal conditions with changing return and background signals, verify false alarm rate using ranging performance test data • Reflectivity Measurements (Instr): • Monitor laser output energy with calibrated GSE meter. • Inject optical pulses into receiver and measure independently with calibrated meter. • Optical Alignment (Instr. & S/C): • Verify boresight alignment at instrument assembly, before and after vibe and during TVAC • Measure LOLA optical axis wrt ref. cube on instr. • Measure LOLA ref. cube wrt S/C alignment cube after integration, vibe, TVAC and shipment to launch site • Laser Performance (Instr. & S/C): • Continuous monitoring of laser output energy • Periodic measurement of beam quality (during alignment) ANALYSES: • Structural • Thermal • STOP (Structural-Thermal-Optical) • Optical Stray Light Analysis and Test result are assessed with respect to requirements for compliance • Requirements tracking includes verification methods and compliance criteria
Instrument Current Status • Major trade studies since Instrument inception which have been closed • Oscillator Count and Location => LRO provides signal and reliability (mass savings) • Be vs. Aluminum => Be (mass savings) • BK7 vs Sapphire => BK7 (mass savings) • Interface comms =>1553 (flight experience) • Major ongoing trade studies which could impact either Instrument top-level requirements • MEB coupling to Optic Deck • Laser Ranging for Orbit Determination • Analyses currently being performed: • Structural • Thermal • Reliability • Hardware currently in development: • Laser • Electrical (Power, Analog, Digital)
Summary • Network Schedule Established • Grass-roots Budget Estimation In Process • Instrument Requirements Document Baselined • Constraints on LRO have been flowed down and captured in the MRD. • Breadboarding Successful • Diffractive Optic Element (DOE) • Laser • Fiber optic alignment • SRR/PDR Completed, “Passed with Reservations” • Delta-PDR required. • Double check requirements flow-down to Level IV • Check readiness of subsystems for final design • Ready to move to preliminary design