1 / 34

Session 2 : Introduction to DRR /M

Session 2 : Introduction to DRR /M. DRR for FNS FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRR for FNS. The result of cross-departmental collaboration throughout FAO including field, spearheaded by NRC and TCE, and guided by the SOI OR1 Technical Team.

rance
Download Presentation

Session 2 : Introduction to DRR /M

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session 2: Introduction to DRR/M

  2. DRR for FNS FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME

  3. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRR for FNS • The result of cross-departmental collaboration throughout FAO including field, spearheaded by NRC and TCE, and guided by the SOI OR1 Technical Team. • Wide consultation process with the Decentralized Offices, Emergency rehabilitation teams and some donors. • Builds on existing DRR work, good practices and processes in FAO.

  4. DISASTER RISKS & FNS: KEY FACTS • Number, scale and impact of disasters sharply increasing: minimum USD200 billion of annual economic losses from weather and climate related disasters in 2010 (not counting some losses difficult to monetize such as ecosystems services). • Disasters destroy livelihoods, reduce food production and increase hunger. • Disasters reverse development and poverty-reduction gains, and compromise the achievement of MDG1. • The clear link between shocks and hunger reveals the fragility of current food production systems and their vulnerability to disruptions. • 2.5 billion smallholders are particularly exposed to disasters/climate risks. Almost 1 billion people are food insecure and vulnerable to disasters. • DRR is cost-effective: for every US$1 spent on DRR, $2-4 dollars are returned in terms of avoided or reduced disaster impacts.

  5. WHY AN FAO DRR for FNS FRAMEWORK? • FAO Regional Conferences 2010: all identified DRR/DRM as priority. • Committee on Agriculture confirmed the importance of a corporate approach to DRR/M. Programme Committee & Committee on Agriculture: underscored the need for synergy between SO I and the other eight strategic objectives. • Improve Results for achieving SO I. • Ad hoc, scattered DRR projects; need for more systematicand programmatic approach. • Limited Knowledge of DRR for the FNS sector. • Low visibility of FAO’s sectoral expertise in DRR/M.

  6. WHY? KEY RECOMMENDATIONS • HARMONIZE • COHERENT • CORPORATE APPROACH • INTER-DISCIPLINARY / PROGRAMMATIC • STRATEGIC DIRECTION • PROACTIVE

  7. Multiple Threats to Agricultural Livelihoods DRR/M in Agriculture includes more than climate induced hazards All natural disasters Protracted Crisis Food chain emergencies Social and economic crisis Climate change => will impact on all above

  8. DISASTER RISK REDUCTION & MANAGEMENT Prevention Mitigation Preparedness Response Rehabilitation Transition Major hazard/disaster normal economic/social growth pattern Smaller hazard/disaster DRR initiatives DRR in place DRR initiatives Hazard Impacts with DRR planning and monitoring DRR initiatives Impacts without Hazard Multi-hazard risk and vulnerability assessment Assessing damage /loss & planning recovery Multi-hazard early warning system Preparedness for response Infrastructure rehabilitation Relief operations Livelihood recovery & rehabilitation Mainstreaming DRM in development Legal & institutional arrangements for DRM Promotion of hazard proof technologies, Land use planning, Disaster management information system & awareness-raising on DRR, Risk transfer, Scaling up CBDRM Media response

  9. SO I & THE DRR for FNS FRAMEWORK FAO Strategic Objective I: improved preparedness for, and effective response to, food and agricultural threats and emergencies. Organizational Result 1: Countries´ vulnerabilities to crisis, threats and emergencies is reduced through better preparedness and integration of risk prevention and mitigationinto policies, programmes and interventions. Organizational Result 2: Countries and partners respond more effectively to crises and emergencies with food and agriculture-related interventions. Organizational Result 3: Countries and partners have improved transition and linkages between emergency, rehabilitation and development. Effective Response Improved Transition DRR Disaster Risk Management Activities under other Strategic Objectives

  10. THE THEMATIC PILLARS OF THE FRAMEWORK CROSS-CUTTING PRIORITIES capacity development; knowledge management and communication; strategic partnerships; gender equity.

  11. PILLAR 1: ENABLE THE ENVIRONMENT

  12. PILLAR 1: ENABLE THE ENVIRONMENT Options for Capacity Development

  13. PILLAR 1: ENABLE THE ENVIRONMENT Examples of Good Practice Belize Nepal Jamaica Ethiopia Community-based Disaster Risk Reduction Plan. Philippines Planning and policy advise for improved Disaster Risk Reduction in agriculture. Philippines

  14. PILLAR 1: ENABLE THE ENVIRONMENT Ministry of Agriculture RADA NADRM Unit NDRM Committee & sub-committees NADRM Committee PADRM Committees PDCs NGO & Civic Groups Examples of Good Practice Institutional Structure for Agricultural Disaster Risk Management: JAMAICA

  15. PILLAR 2: WATCH TO SAFEGUARD

  16. PILLAR 2: WATCH TO SAFEGUARD Options for Capacity Development Threats to FNS Drought Floods Hurricanes Earthquakes Tsunamis Soaring food prices Plan pests Animal diseases Aquatic animal disease Climate change

  17. PILLAR 2: WATCH TO SAFEGUARD Examples of Good Practice FCC EMPRES: Cassava disease. GIEWS: Global food price monitor Harvesting healthy cassava

  18. PILLAR 2: WATCH TO SAFEGUARD Examples of Good Practice Locust Watch IPC: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification GIEWS: Vegetation Index

  19. PILLAR 3: PREPARE TO RESPOND

  20. PILLAR 3: PREPARE TO RESPOND Scaling-up Preparedness for Response and Recovery Multiple threats to food security. More frequent and severe climate related hazards. Preparedness in Member Countries Corporate Preparedness

  21. PILLAR 3: PREPARE TO RESPOND Examples of Good Practice Storage facility Seed reserves Fisheries: emergency guidance & best practice Livestock shelters Forest fire mgmt training

  22. PILLAR 3: PREPARE TO RESPOND Corporate Preparedness Strengthen Corporate Preparedness for Improved Response and Recovery Standard Operating Procedures for preparedness and response. Preparedness planning in DO for recurrent disasters. Preparedness planning guidelines. Logistics & Procurement Preparedness. • Standby agreements for surge capacity. • Roster. • Staff training. Financial Resources for preparedness.

  23. PILLAR 4: BUILD RESILIENCE

  24. PILLAR 4: BUILD RESILIENCE Options for Capacity Development Livestock Fisheries Agriculture • Fodder conservation. • Proofing of storage facilities and livestock shelters. • Strategic animal fodder reserves. • Resilient animal breeding • Pest management to cope with threats • Implementation of the Code of conduct for responsible fisheries • Aquaculture biosecurity measures to reduce or prevent the spread of fish disease • Fisheries / aquaculture insurance • Conservation agriculture • Crop diversification • Appropriate crop selection (drought/saline/flood tolerant) • Adjust cropping calendars • Seed systems • Crop breeding Water Forests Land • Rainwater harvesting, conservation & storage • Water reserves to buffer droughts • Restoration of degraded lands • Land use/access, tenure & territorial planning • Land and soil management • Forest pests prevention • Agro-forestry • Integrated Fire Management • Afforestation / reforestation • Preventive silviculture

  25. PILLAR 4: BUILD RESILIENCE Examples of Practice: Resilient Livelihoods Vaccination of poultry Drought tolerant maize Aquaculture biosecurity measures Biosecurity to control spread of trans-boundary animal diseases Biological pest control Conservation agriculture

  26. PILLAR 4: BUILD RESILIENCE Examples of Good Practice: Redress Drivers of Risk with NRM Terrace cultivation to reduce soil erosion Soil fixation to reduce land degradation Nature’s defense capacity against hazards is reduced by deforestation, degradation of catchments / watersheds, degradation of land and coastal ecosystems such as corals and mangroves, among other factors. This degradation also aggravates the impact of disasters such as floods, landslides, storm surges, hurricanes and drought.

  27. PILLAR 4: BUILD RESILIENCE Examples of Good Practice: Redress Drivers of Risk with NRM Agroforestry Rainwater harvesting Trees can be used as shelterbelts and windbreaks. They can stabilize riverbanks, mitigate soil erosion, protect against landslides and floods. Technologies and practices that use less water, reduce water loss, and increase overall water productivity.

  28. THE APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTING Global Inter-disciplinary Agriculture Livestock Fisheries Forestry Natural Resource Management Programmatic Regional 1/Enable the Environment National Local 2/Watch to Safeguard 3/Prepare to Respond 4/Build Resilience Sustainable Livelihoods and Ecosystem Perspective

  29. THEMATIC PILLARS - ALIGNED TO THE HFA Contributing to the Achievement of MDG 1: theEradication of Poverty and Hunger. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 FAO’s DRR for FNS Framework Programme Priorities for Action Thematic Pillars 1. Ensure DRR is a national & local priority with a strong basis for implementation. 1/ ENABLE THE ENVIRONMENT 2. Identify, assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance early warning. 2/ WATCH TO SAFEGUARD 5. Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels. 3/ PREPARE TO RESPOND 4/ BUILD RESILIENCE 4. Reduce the underlying risk factors. CROSS-CUTTING PRIORITIES 3. knowledge, innovation & education to build a culture of resilience.

  30. SHARED COMMON OBJECTIVE: Scale-up and accelerate DRR and CCA actions to build resilience. Support the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and contribute to Sustainable Development. DISASTER RISK AND CLIMATE CHANGE DRR CCA Disaster Risk Climate Change Common concern with climate-related risks and hazards Greater stress on food production systems, pushing upwards food and nutrition insecurity and global hunger.

  31. WHAT IS THE NEW FP ON DRR for FNS? • An inter-disciplinary and programmatic approach to DRR. • Structured consolidation of all existing DRR work in FAO (umbrella and menu). • Provides strategic and coherent approach to DRR in FAO. • Leading example of an overall sectoral approach to DRR (FNS). • Guidance for developing region/country tailored DRR for FNS for CPF, programme and interventions. • Supports the scaling-up of DRR actions for FNS. • Advocacy tool for DRR in FNS. IT IS NOT a ready made blueprint for DRR project design!

  32. NEXT STEPS • Roll-out of the DRR for FNS: • In priority countries / sub-regions based on demand • Mainstream into Country Programme Frameworks • Streamline regional DRR/M strategies with the DRR for FNS FP • Add in the crisis dimension of complex emergencies • Mobilize Resources / Strategic partnerships with donors and key actors. • Communicate, inform share FAO work on DRR and resilience. • Reinforce multidisciplinary support teams at global, regional, national levels. • Learn from and consolidate joint inter-disciplinary results for DRR-resilience into the next MTP / PWB (already embedded into the organization planning/implementation process in 2012-13).

  33. THANK YOU!

  34. Blue wall applied exercise 2

More Related